<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AutoCAD 2009 - The Prequel Part 9 - Docked Toolbars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/05/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-9-docked-toolbars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/05/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-9-docked-toolbars/</link>
	<description>A strange mix of AutoCAD, music, image manipulation and video</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/05/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-9-docked-toolbars/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/05/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-9-docked-toolbars/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>my thoughts exactly. they put a lot of work intothe visual appearence of the system and still managed to hose it up. tahts what happens when a committe designs things instead of a designer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my thoughts exactly. they put a lot of work intothe visual appearence of the system and still managed to hose it up. tahts what happens when a committe designs things instead of a designer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
