<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AutoCAD 2009 - The Prequel Part 14 - What do you think?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/13/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-14-what-do-you-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/13/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-14-what-do-you-think/</link>
	<description>A strange mix of AutoCAD, music, image manipulation and video</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: R.K. McSwain</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/13/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-14-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>R.K. McSwain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/13/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-14-what-do-you-think/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>It will look and feel like a "modern application" to users new to AutoCAD.

However I think many long time users will turn off all the new UI stuff and continue to use the command line, toolbars, and pull-downs. Just like many people turned off all the Windows XP eye candy and made it look like Win2000.

See you back in a 3 or 4 years to see how close I was...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will look and feel like a &#8220;modern application&#8221; to users new to AutoCAD.</p>
<p>However I think many long time users will turn off all the new UI stuff and continue to use the command line, toolbars, and pull-downs. Just like many people turned off all the Windows XP eye candy and made it look like Win2000.</p>
<p>See you back in a 3 or 4 years to see how close I was&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/13/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-14-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/13/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-14-what-do-you-think/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Tim, I'll answer your question as a full post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, I&#8217;ll answer your question as a full post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/13/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-14-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/13/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-14-what-do-you-think/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>The new UI is going to be hard to implement in the office.  It is just too different for what most are used to.  I am excited for a lot of the new features though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new UI is going to be hard to implement in the office.  It is just too different for what most are used to.  I am excited for a lot of the new features though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Mollohan</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/13/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-14-what-do-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Mollohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/13/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-14-what-do-you-think/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>I've always changed the background color to a light shade. In the pre paperspace days (for those old enough to remember) I did this to more accurately visualize color plotting. I guess I’ve gotten use to that over the years. This particular shade seems a little too close to the background color of the block editor. Has that changed with this release? I will likely go with a light shade of grey similar to the ribbon panel background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always changed the background color to a light shade. In the pre paperspace days (for those old enough to remember) I did this to more accurately visualize color plotting. I guess I’ve gotten use to that over the years. This particular shade seems a little too close to the background color of the block editor. Has that changed with this release? I will likely go with a light shade of grey similar to the ribbon panel background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
