<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AutoCAD 2009 - Automatic spell checker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/04/11/autocad-2009-automatic-spell-checker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/04/11/autocad-2009-automatic-spell-checker/</link>
	<description>A strange mix of AutoCAD, music, image manipulation and video</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Engr.Shamim</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/04/11/autocad-2009-automatic-spell-checker/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Engr.Shamim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=79#comment-305</guid>
		<description>It is very good for works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very good for works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralphg</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/04/11/autocad-2009-automatic-spell-checker/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>ralphg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=79#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Spell checkers are not spell checkers; they are word recognizers. If the word appears in a list of words, then it is valid -- context be darned.

As a professional writer, it frustrates me greatly how gushing-with-billions-in-R&#38;D companies like Microsoft are incapable of advancing spell and grammar checking beyond what my DOS copy of WordPerfect and Grammatik did 20 years ago.

But, I must say that real-time spell checking is wonderful, even if it is a 10-year-old feature in other words-oriented software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spell checkers are not spell checkers; they are word recognizers. If the word appears in a list of words, then it is valid &#8212; context be darned.</p>
<p>As a professional writer, it frustrates me greatly how gushing-with-billions-in-R&amp;D companies like Microsoft are incapable of advancing spell and grammar checking beyond what my DOS copy of WordPerfect and Grammatik did 20 years ago.</p>
<p>But, I must say that real-time spell checking is wonderful, even if it is a 10-year-old feature in other words-oriented software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
