<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AutoCAD 2009 Update 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/09/26/autocad-2009-update-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/09/26/autocad-2009-update-2/</link>
	<description>A strange mix of AutoCAD, music, image manipulation and video</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/09/26/autocad-2009-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1979</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=212#comment-1979</guid>
		<description>I don't know. In my CAD Manager role, the answer is "once a release". I don't distribute a given release more than once, or apply service packs after the fact, because of limitations of the existing installation deployment system. That's something that Autodesk should have sorted out before embarking on this rush-em-out Update and Subscription Pack policy. If I ever do end up distributing 2009 to my users as a general release, it will likely be with Update 3 or even 4, and then it will stick at that stage until the next release I deploy, barring emergencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know. In my CAD Manager role, the answer is &#8220;once a release&#8221;. I don&#8217;t distribute a given release more than once, or apply service packs after the fact, because of limitations of the existing installation deployment system. That&#8217;s something that Autodesk should have sorted out before embarking on this rush-em-out Update and Subscription Pack policy. If I ever do end up distributing 2009 to my users as a general release, it will likely be with Update 3 or even 4, and then it will stick at that stage until the next release I deploy, barring emergencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Capper</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/09/26/autocad-2009-update-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1975</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Capper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=212#comment-1975</guid>
		<description>They're being issued at quite a rate. I wonder how fast they are being deployed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re being issued at quite a rate. I wonder how fast they are being deployed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
