<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I haven&#8217;t seen AutoCAD 2010&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/19/i-havent-seen-autocad-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/19/i-havent-seen-autocad-2010/</link>
	<description>Mostly AutoCAD discussion, but also music, image manipulation and video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:13:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/19/i-havent-seen-autocad-2010/#comment-3526</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=318#comment-3526</guid>
		<description>what about a polyline that combines features of a regular polyline (has arcs but x,y coordinates only) and 3d poly (x,y,z coordinate but no arcs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about a polyline that combines features of a regular polyline (has arcs but x,y coordinates only) and 3d poly (x,y,z coordinate but no arcs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/19/i-havent-seen-autocad-2010/#comment-3228</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=318#comment-3228</guid>
		<description>I would like an option to keep the original object after subtracting it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like an option to keep the original object after subtracting it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/19/i-havent-seen-autocad-2010/#comment-3027</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=318#comment-3027</guid>
		<description>2010 a Vista-only product? I don&#039;t think so. With &lt;a href=&quot;http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;XP users still outnumbering Vista users&lt;/a&gt; by more than 3 to 1, Autodesk would not be that silly. How many Microsoft products are Vista-only?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010 a Vista-only product? I don&#8217;t think so. With <a href="http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=11" rel="nofollow">XP users still outnumbering Vista users</a> by more than 3 to 1, Autodesk would not be that silly. How many Microsoft products are Vista-only?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/19/i-havent-seen-autocad-2010/#comment-3018</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=318#comment-3018</guid>
		<description>I heard 2010 maybe a VISTA only product ?
Has Anyone seen a Reccommended Specification yet ?
When&#039;s the Trial version available?
Should we skip 2010,11 and 12  ROFL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard 2010 maybe a VISTA only product ?<br />
Has Anyone seen a Reccommended Specification yet ?<br />
When&#8217;s the Trial version available?<br />
Should we skip 2010,11 and 12  ROFL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Kubaskie</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/19/i-havent-seen-autocad-2010/#comment-2693</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Kubaskie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=318#comment-2693</guid>
		<description>They could really find a clue or two in the way ESRI&#039;s ArcMap edits polyline/polygon geometry. Their Modify Feature and Reshape feature modes are pretty simple.

At least I&#039;d like to be able to add an arc segment and/or fillet at a single vertex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could really find a clue or two in the way ESRI&#8217;s ArcMap edits polyline/polygon geometry. Their Modify Feature and Reshape feature modes are pretty simple.</p>
<p>At least I&#8217;d like to be able to add an arc segment and/or fillet at a single vertex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadenza</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/19/i-havent-seen-autocad-2010/#comment-2659</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadenza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=318#comment-2659</guid>
		<description>Why are Autodesk pursuing 3D in vanilla Acad? They have just killed off MDT which was way ahead of anything in Acad vanilla and if you are serious about 3D there is Inventor albeit at additional cost.

I’d like to see some real improvements any where and for them to give up tinkering with the user interface for the sake of changing something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are Autodesk pursuing 3D in vanilla Acad? They have just killed off MDT which was way ahead of anything in Acad vanilla and if you are serious about 3D there is Inventor albeit at additional cost.</p>
<p>I’d like to see some real improvements any where and for them to give up tinkering with the user interface for the sake of changing something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Stachoni</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/19/i-havent-seen-autocad-2010/#comment-2644</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Stachoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=318#comment-2644</guid>
		<description>We need some real, decent polyline and spline editing tools. PEDIT is a joke and has been since, well, forever. Adding a simple vertex is just absurdly hard. We need real Bezier curves with tangential grips like in Illustrator and every other vector-based app out there.
Parametrics are cool, but I&#039;d really like to see something  similar to AutoCAD Architecture&#039;s anchoring system, specifically the curtain wall/door-window assy system that allows you to evenly divide spaces intelligently and dynamically.
Heck, I&#039;d just love to see WIPEFOUT actually work for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need some real, decent polyline and spline editing tools. PEDIT is a joke and has been since, well, forever. Adding a simple vertex is just absurdly hard. We need real Bezier curves with tangential grips like in Illustrator and every other vector-based app out there.<br />
Parametrics are cool, but I&#8217;d really like to see something  similar to AutoCAD Architecture&#8217;s anchoring system, specifically the curtain wall/door-window assy system that allows you to evenly divide spaces intelligently and dynamically.<br />
Heck, I&#8217;d just love to see WIPEFOUT actually work for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Cowgill</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/19/i-havent-seen-autocad-2010/#comment-2622</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cowgill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=318#comment-2622</guid>
		<description>I would like to see some additional functionality added to visual lisp, or to lisp that allows some of the newer features to be easily modified, specifically mleaders.  I also would like to be able to run spell check programmatically again and for spell check to recognize punctuation as part of a word like back in 05. In our office (TYP.) is correct TYP. is not.  Fixing alot of the broken features would be very nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see some additional functionality added to visual lisp, or to lisp that allows some of the newer features to be easily modified, specifically mleaders.  I also would like to be able to run spell check programmatically again and for spell check to recognize punctuation as part of a word like back in 05. In our office (TYP.) is correct TYP. is not.  Fixing alot of the broken features would be very nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/19/i-havent-seen-autocad-2010/#comment-2617</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=318#comment-2617</guid>
		<description>I need/expect/demand a &quot;None&quot; selection be added to 2010&#039;s overlay schemes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need/expect/demand a &#8220;None&#8221; selection be added to 2010&#8242;s overlay schemes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/11/19/i-havent-seen-autocad-2010/#comment-2616</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=318#comment-2616</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see easier editing of 3D solids. I&#039;m still using R2007 where grip editing doesn&#039;t work on all objects and the stretch command only moves the entire object. I&#039;m tired of erasing and redrawing an object when I can&#039;t figure out an easy way to modify it. 3D editing should be as easy as 2D editing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see easier editing of 3D solids. I&#8217;m still using R2007 where grip editing doesn&#8217;t work on all objects and the stretch command only moves the entire object. I&#8217;m tired of erasing and redrawing an object when I can&#8217;t figure out an easy way to modify it. 3D editing should be as easy as 2D editing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

