<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging = arrogance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/</link>
	<description>Mostly AutoCAD discussion, but also music, image manipulation and video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:13:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-4874</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 04:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-4874</guid>
		<description>This post is a blast from the past! That&#039;s why I like to keep my 50 Most Commented Posts list in the sidebar, it provides the possibility of keeping open discussion of some thought-provoking subjects, way after they have scrolled off the front page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is a blast from the past! That&#8217;s why I like to keep my 50 Most Commented Posts list in the sidebar, it provides the possibility of keeping open discussion of some thought-provoking subjects, way after they have scrolled off the front page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srlafleur</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-4864</link>
		<dc:creator>srlafleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-4864</guid>
		<description>Huh! And how is blogging inherently different from writing articles for newspapers/magazines? Or different from writing books? If blogging is arrogant, then it&#039;s also pretty arrogant to write any sort of book, be it fiction or not, expecting that anyone would care to read it, no? Or to write or play music, expecting someone to care to hear it, or, for that matter, to create anything for anyone else&#039;s use or pleasure.
Pshaw!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh! And how is blogging inherently different from writing articles for newspapers/magazines? Or different from writing books? If blogging is arrogant, then it&#8217;s also pretty arrogant to write any sort of book, be it fiction or not, expecting that anyone would care to read it, no? Or to write or play music, expecting someone to care to hear it, or, for that matter, to create anything for anyone else&#8217;s use or pleasure.<br />
Pshaw!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RW</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-4862</link>
		<dc:creator>RW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 02:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-4862</guid>
		<description>It all depends on the blogger in question. Many people blog for their friends and family, not intending to gain a public audience. Some people are casual bloggers who write about their interests. The bloggers I find the most arrogant are the highly opinionated ones. Highly opinionated bloggers always come off as snobs who are using their blog as a way to talk down to the public. They are narcissists who need an audience to feed their ego. These people usually blog about politics, and most of them have no particular expertise in that field- just strong (and usually uneducated) opinions. The internet generation is a generation of people who like to bloviate, but who generally won&#039;t leave their computer chair to to try to fix the problems they blog about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all depends on the blogger in question. Many people blog for their friends and family, not intending to gain a public audience. Some people are casual bloggers who write about their interests. The bloggers I find the most arrogant are the highly opinionated ones. Highly opinionated bloggers always come off as snobs who are using their blog as a way to talk down to the public. They are narcissists who need an audience to feed their ego. These people usually blog about politics, and most of them have no particular expertise in that field- just strong (and usually uneducated) opinions. The internet generation is a generation of people who like to bloviate, but who generally won&#8217;t leave their computer chair to to try to fix the problems they blog about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-3429</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 00:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-3429</guid>
		<description>At the risk of being too philosophical, everything we do is arrogance.  The only question is, is it beneficial or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of being too philosophical, everything we do is arrogance.  The only question is, is it beneficial or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-3295</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-3295</guid>
		<description>Keep up the great blog - that set of videos &quot;Does Autodesk really listen&quot; have made you a folk hero among people I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the great blog &#8211; that set of videos &#8220;Does Autodesk really listen&#8221; have made you a folk hero among people I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fcsuper</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-3294</link>
		<dc:creator>fcsuper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-3294</guid>
		<description>I can only assume the only purpose of this post is to provoke, and that you have, with irony.  It is appears the person who said that comment is perhaps projecting their own trait on to others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only assume the only purpose of this post is to provoke, and that you have, with irony.  It is appears the person who said that comment is perhaps projecting their own trait on to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Benton</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-3291</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Benton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-3291</guid>
		<description>I struggled with this when i started blogging.  Why would anyone read what I write?  I started blogging to store information and knowledge about CAD tat I have accrued over the years for my coworkers.  But they refused to read it because they thought they new more than I did.  Arrogance is bliss they say.  Bloggers must feel they have something to share, or else what&#039;s the point of blogging?  I have learned as much from blogging as I did before I blogged.  Readers have provided new insights and the research I conducted for many posts taught me more and more.  I have been able to spread knowledge through my blog but I have also learned from my blogging experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I struggled with this when i started blogging.  Why would anyone read what I write?  I started blogging to store information and knowledge about CAD tat I have accrued over the years for my coworkers.  But they refused to read it because they thought they new more than I did.  Arrogance is bliss they say.  Bloggers must feel they have something to share, or else what&#8217;s the point of blogging?  I have learned as much from blogging as I did before I blogged.  Readers have provided new insights and the research I conducted for many posts taught me more and more.  I have been able to spread knowledge through my blog but I have also learned from my blogging experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-3289</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-3289</guid>
		<description>I think whoever that quote is from is pretty arrogant!

I think that is a pretty big generalization...  If one blogs with an arrogant attitude, then yeah; but how many readers will continue to read?  If someone has knowledge and is willing to share what they know for the betterment of others, where is the arrogance in that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think whoever that quote is from is pretty arrogant!</p>
<p>I think that is a pretty big generalization&#8230;  If one blogs with an arrogant attitude, then yeah; but how many readers will continue to read?  If someone has knowledge and is willing to share what they know for the betterment of others, where is the arrogance in that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Paul Waddington</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-3288</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Paul Waddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-3288</guid>
		<description>The ability to argue points of view, pass on information, learn from others and add to a growing pool of accessible information can only ever be viewed as empowering.
Any arrogance would be the trait of the writer(s), easily separated from the content by a discerning &#039;reader&#039;.
Thanks for providing the forum to do so Steve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ability to argue points of view, pass on information, learn from others and add to a growing pool of accessible information can only ever be viewed as empowering.<br />
Any arrogance would be the trait of the writer(s), easily separated from the content by a discerning &#8216;reader&#8217;.<br />
Thanks for providing the forum to do so Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derrek cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>derrek cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>silly statement. blogging is freedom of speech, don&#039;t like what I have to say, don&#039;t read it. Blogging, to me, is a way to interact with like-minded (or not) people with similar interests (or not). If you were forced to read a blog or if it were put in your face in order to get to more info - yes! that is arrogant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>silly statement. blogging is freedom of speech, don&#8217;t like what I have to say, don&#8217;t read it. Blogging, to me, is a way to interact with like-minded (or not) people with similar interests (or not). If you were forced to read a blog or if it were put in your face in order to get to more info &#8211; yes! that is arrogant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.K. McSwain</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-3286</link>
		<dc:creator>R.K. McSwain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-3286</guid>
		<description>Back in the day, before blogging and fancy websites, I learned a ton about CAD from the usenet and adsk newsgroups. So for me, it&#039;s simply a way of giving back. There will always be newbies out there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the day, before blogging and fancy websites, I learned a ton about CAD from the usenet and adsk newsgroups. So for me, it&#8217;s simply a way of giving back. There will always be newbies out there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralphg</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-3284</link>
		<dc:creator>ralphg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-3284</guid>
		<description>Who made the quote? Sounds like a communist to me. &quot;Everyone&#039;s thoughts must be equally bland; great thinkers must be put to manual work on communal farms.&quot; That got tried once; didn&#039;t work out so well.

Just by making the statement, s/he is being arrogant, assuming that their opinion is worth more than that of others. Heh.

The great thing about the free press is that noboody needs to read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who made the quote? Sounds like a communist to me. &#8220;Everyone&#8217;s thoughts must be equally bland; great thinkers must be put to manual work on communal farms.&#8221; That got tried once; didn&#8217;t work out so well.</p>
<p>Just by making the statement, s/he is being arrogant, assuming that their opinion is worth more than that of others. Heh.</p>
<p>The great thing about the free press is that noboody needs to read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave ea</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-3283</link>
		<dc:creator>dave ea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-3283</guid>
		<description>perhaps it is arrogant... to assume all bloggers are arrogant...?  -dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps it is arrogant&#8230; to assume all bloggers are arrogant&#8230;?  -dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metis</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-3282</link>
		<dc:creator>metis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-3282</guid>
		<description>yes and no.  it is arrogant, but it assumes (at a minimum) that you think others will be interested in your opinion.  it does not imply that you think your opinion is worth more, but simply of value.

granted alot of folks are arrogant bloggers, but arrogance in moderation (knowing that you have a valued opinion) is not a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes and no.  it is arrogant, but it assumes (at a minimum) that you think others will be interested in your opinion.  it does not imply that you think your opinion is worth more, but simply of value.</p>
<p>granted alot of folks are arrogant bloggers, but arrogance in moderation (knowing that you have a valued opinion) is not a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metheus</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>metheus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a poorly formulated thought, displaying a lack of understanding. The source of your quote doesn&#039;t understand blogging as a new mode of communication and resents it. Is talking inherently arrogant? Some bloggers are arrogant, yes, as are some talkers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a poorly formulated thought, displaying a lack of understanding. The source of your quote doesn&#8217;t understand blogging as a new mode of communication and resents it. Is talking inherently arrogant? Some bloggers are arrogant, yes, as are some talkers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenbloom</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/18/blogging-arrogance/#comment-3280</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=440#comment-3280</guid>
		<description>My response would be, &quot;so what?&quot;.  I might have knowledge you (meaning, &quot;one&quot;), don&#039;t have and if I can give it to you so you also have it, what&#039;s the problem?  Is it arrogant that I think I have this knowledge?  No, not if I do.  I&#039;m sure you (meaning, &quot;one&quot;) has knowledge I don&#039;t have.  I&#039;d probably care less that you may or may not be arrogant and care more about having you give me that knowledge in a clear, thorough way.

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My response would be, &#8220;so what?&#8221;.  I might have knowledge you (meaning, &#8220;one&#8221;), don&#8217;t have and if I can give it to you so you also have it, what&#8217;s the problem?  Is it arrogant that I think I have this knowledge?  No, not if I do.  I&#8217;m sure you (meaning, &#8220;one&#8221;) has knowledge I don&#8217;t have.  I&#8217;d probably care less that you may or may not be arrogant and care more about having you give me that knowledge in a clear, thorough way.</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

