<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Older AutoCAD loses (part of) the plot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/</link>
	<description>A strange mix of AutoCAD, music, image manipulation and video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:51:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alberto</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-4113</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-4113</guid>
		<description>Hi guys I&#039;m having the same issue and found a solution that worked for me...

Open all the external xrefs, audit/purge and save them. Open the real dwg and do a print preview if they show up great you&#039;re done if they are not there.

Open the xrefs again and save them down to v2000 save and try again.

This is a huge problem for us too....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys I&#8217;m having the same issue and found a solution that worked for me&#8230;</p>
<p>Open all the external xrefs, audit/purge and save them. Open the real dwg and do a print preview if they show up great you&#8217;re done if they are not there.</p>
<p>Open the xrefs again and save them down to v2000 save and try again.</p>
<p>This is a huge problem for us too&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-4080</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-4080</guid>
		<description>Only a portion of my drawings using 2005 were plotting using Adobe printer.  The drawings included view ports that were clipped using a polygon shape.  The plotting quit at the end of the first clipped view.  I went back and changed the viewports to a rectangle shape and all drawings plotted fine.  
Please, is there a fix yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only a portion of my drawings using 2005 were plotting using Adobe printer.  The drawings included view ports that were clipped using a polygon shape.  The plotting quit at the end of the first clipped view.  I went back and changed the viewports to a rectangle shape and all drawings plotted fine.<br />
Please, is there a fix yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gackter</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3933</link>
		<dc:creator>Gackter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3933</guid>
		<description>It happened with our xref. So we did all of the above -- recoverall, purge, audit and finally reloaded the xref and it worked. No sure which part made it work but well... it worked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It happened with our xref. So we did all of the above &#8212; recoverall, purge, audit and finally reloaded the xref and it worked. No sure which part made it work but well&#8230; it worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Weigle</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3865</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Weigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3865</guid>
		<description>Has everyone found that CutePDF is solving this issue?

We experience this issue very randomly...which makes it an even bigger issue.  We never know when its happening or when its going to happen.  It goes away for a month then comes back.

AutoDesk is aware of the issue, but I have yet to see any solutions come from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has everyone found that CutePDF is solving this issue?</p>
<p>We experience this issue very randomly&#8230;which makes it an even bigger issue.  We never know when its happening or when its going to happen.  It goes away for a month then comes back.</p>
<p>AutoDesk is aware of the issue, but I have yet to see any solutions come from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Oneal</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3622</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Oneal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3622</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been having this issue lately with some files that I have been trying to print to PDF via Adobe. Today a coworker suggested using CutePDF as the plotter (there is a free version online) and while it did cause my cad to crash and the file is 4 times the size of the adobe file, it worked! I am not sure if this means that the plotter is to blame or not but worth considering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been having this issue lately with some files that I have been trying to print to PDF via Adobe. Today a coworker suggested using CutePDF as the plotter (there is a free version online) and while it did cause my cad to crash and the file is 4 times the size of the adobe file, it worked! I am not sure if this means that the plotter is to blame or not but worth considering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3469</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3469</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve mentioned it, but only very recently. If anyone wants me to get their example drawings noticed by Autodesk, please get in touch using the CONTACT link at the top of the page and I&#039;ll arrange to get them passed on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve mentioned it, but only very recently. If anyone wants me to get their example drawings noticed by Autodesk, please get in touch using the CONTACT link at the top of the page and I&#8217;ll arrange to get them passed on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3464</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3464</guid>
		<description>Steve and all,

Has anyone reported this to AutoDesk?

Any response?

I don&#039;t see anyone having solved this anywhere.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve and all,</p>
<p>Has anyone reported this to AutoDesk?</p>
<p>Any response?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see anyone having solved this anywhere.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3447</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3447</guid>
		<description>Ah. I see. I was under the impression that would tell you the native version, sorry about that. I guess it&#039;s limited to the binary formats, not the individual releases. My bad. lol

Well, win some lose some. I haven&#039;t come across this particular problem because due to client standards we don&#039;t use dynamic blocks. Not my choice, believe me. :)

Back to the drawing board, as it were...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah. I see. I was under the impression that would tell you the native version, sorry about that. I guess it&#8217;s limited to the binary formats, not the individual releases. My bad. lol</p>
<p>Well, win some lose some. I haven&#8217;t come across this particular problem because due to client standards we don&#8217;t use dynamic blocks. Not my choice, believe me. <img src='http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Back to the drawing board, as it were&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3379</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3379</guid>
		<description>Jim, thanks, but that doesn&#039;t tell us which release &lt;em&gt;created&lt;/em&gt; a given drawing. It just tells us what in format the drawing was &lt;em&gt;last saved&lt;/em&gt;. Every drawing we archive has AC1015 in it, but they could have been created by releases from 2000 to 2009, and any vertical variants of them. It could also have passed through several different releases before we see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, thanks, but that doesn&#8217;t tell us which release <em>created</em> a given drawing. It just tells us what in format the drawing was <em>last saved</em>. Every drawing we archive has AC1015 in it, but they could have been created by releases from 2000 to 2009, and any vertical variants of them. It could also have passed through several different releases before we see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Erway</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3378</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Erway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3378</guid>
		<description>We have had this problem with viewports that are vpclipped. Removing the clip restores everything to normal (except the view that we carefully created by clipping the viewport!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have had this problem with viewports that are vpclipped. Removing the clip restores everything to normal (except the view that we carefully created by clipping the viewport!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silleke</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3376</link>
		<dc:creator>Silleke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3376</guid>
		<description>It does not only happen with drawing which contains Dynamic blocks. With us, it happened with a xref&#039;s not being plotted when the drawing file was edited using AutoCAD 2008. User of AutoCAD 2007 will missed part of the drawing, namely the xref attached. We asked the user of AutoCAD 2007 to use True View 2009 which is free to download and use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does not only happen with drawing which contains Dynamic blocks. With us, it happened with a xref&#8217;s not being plotted when the drawing file was edited using AutoCAD 2008. User of AutoCAD 2007 will missed part of the drawing, namely the xref attached. We asked the user of AutoCAD 2007 to use True View 2009 which is free to download and use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3375</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3375</guid>
		<description>Steve,

There is a way to find out what version created a given drawing; just change the extention on a .dwg to .txt, open it in notepad or whatever, and the first line will tell you the version used to create it.

AC1006 = R10
AC1009 = R11/12
AC1012 = R13
AC1014 = R14/14.01
AC1015 = 2000, 2000i, 2002
AC1018 = 2004, 2005, 2006
AC1021 = 2007, 2008, 2009

^^^ Thanks to Dan Abbot&#039;s AutoCAD Puzzlers class for that.

Hope that helps.

-Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>There is a way to find out what version created a given drawing; just change the extention on a .dwg to .txt, open it in notepad or whatever, and the first line will tell you the version used to create it.</p>
<p>AC1006 = R10<br />
AC1009 = R11/12<br />
AC1012 = R13<br />
AC1014 = R14/14.01<br />
AC1015 = 2000, 2000i, 2002<br />
AC1018 = 2004, 2005, 2006<br />
AC1021 = 2007, 2008, 2009</p>
<p>^^^ Thanks to Dan Abbot&#8217;s AutoCAD Puzzlers class for that.</p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
<p>-Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3345</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3345</guid>
		<description>Quinn:

I can now confirm that this problem still occurs in 2007 SP2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quinn:</p>
<p>I can now confirm that this problem still occurs in 2007 SP2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3340</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3340</guid>
		<description>Chris Wade (comment 3):

Using Recover did discover a few errors that Audit missed, but the Recover - Purge - Audit - Save process didn&#039;t solve the problem in my sample drawing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Wade (comment 3):</p>
<p>Using Recover did discover a few errors that Audit missed, but the Recover &#8211; Purge &#8211; Audit &#8211; Save process didn&#8217;t solve the problem in my sample drawing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3339</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3339</guid>
		<description>Chris (comment 4):

As these drawings come from an outside contractor that itself contracts out to another company, and as the drawings date back to 2006 (the year, not the release), things are shrouded in mystery. It&#039;s hard to be sure what releases have been used on them. The first date on the sample drawing pictured is 24 April 2006, one month after AutoCAD 2007 was released. So it&#039;s likely that AutoCAD 2006 was used to create it, although 2007 is possible. The drawing has been revised multiple times since then, right up to this month.

There is no obvious evidence that any vertical releases were used, and I can&#039;t tell where the dynamic blocks came from.

We are in exactly the same situation as you with the need to save back to 2000 DWG format. This drawing would definitely have been saved back to 2000 format at the time (we enforce this), and it&#039;s in 2000 format now.

I haven&#039;t tried using anything non-Autodesk on them yet. I&#039;m still investigating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris (comment 4):</p>
<p>As these drawings come from an outside contractor that itself contracts out to another company, and as the drawings date back to 2006 (the year, not the release), things are shrouded in mystery. It&#8217;s hard to be sure what releases have been used on them. The first date on the sample drawing pictured is 24 April 2006, one month after AutoCAD 2007 was released. So it&#8217;s likely that AutoCAD 2006 was used to create it, although 2007 is possible. The drawing has been revised multiple times since then, right up to this month.</p>
<p>There is no obvious evidence that any vertical releases were used, and I can&#8217;t tell where the dynamic blocks came from.</p>
<p>We are in exactly the same situation as you with the need to save back to 2000 DWG format. This drawing would definitely have been saved back to 2000 format at the time (we enforce this), and it&#8217;s in 2000 format now.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t tried using anything non-Autodesk on them yet. I&#8217;m still investigating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3336</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3336</guid>
		<description>The current plot to pdf driver for AutoCAD has similar dropouts when viewed in Acrobat products version 6 and earlier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current plot to pdf driver for AutoCAD has similar dropouts when viewed in Acrobat products version 6 and earlier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yet Another Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3335</link>
		<dc:creator>Yet Another Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3335</guid>
		<description>We have encountered similar problems plotting to pdf as well as dwf in 2008 and 2009, but do not experience it when plotting directly to our OCE printer.  I had assumed it was a vector conversion issue between Adobe and Oce, but now it appears that it&#039;s earlier in the process chain.  We&#039;ve taken to plotting hard copies and then scanning them to create pdf documents.  As this is highly inefficient and loses much of the value of pdf and dwf, I&#039;m inclined to agree that Autodesk needs to figure out what the issue is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have encountered similar problems plotting to pdf as well as dwf in 2008 and 2009, but do not experience it when plotting directly to our OCE printer.  I had assumed it was a vector conversion issue between Adobe and Oce, but now it appears that it&#8217;s earlier in the process chain.  We&#8217;ve taken to plotting hard copies and then scanning them to create pdf documents.  As this is highly inefficient and loses much of the value of pdf and dwf, I&#8217;m inclined to agree that Autodesk needs to figure out what the issue is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3332</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3332</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Thanks for posting this. 

I am the CAD manager for one division (of nine) of a large mining company. Each of our divisions has about 10 to 40 CAD users (total of probably a couple of hunderd or more users) and we use more consultants than we have in house, add to this all of our equipment vendors. So we have thousands of CAD files and our collection is growing exponentially.

I see it as much more than a little dangerous, it has the potential for creating a major disaster. It is on the level that AutoDesk basically needs to do whatever it takes to fix this, it should be first priority period. 

This goes beyond a bug, it is a major screwup, I won’t go into the potential problems that I envision, as they should be obvious. 

I have a few questions.

1. I am assuming that the drawings were done in 2009 and saved to 2007 file format, is this correct?

2. Does saving them back to an earlier format make any difference? (Nothing to do with this, but we save to 2000 file format, this works very well for us with our outside vendors, some of whom use older versions. I see absolutly no justification at this point in time for changing this.)

3. Was straight AutoCAD used or one of the verticals? AutoCAD Electric?

4. Are the dynamic blocks involved created directly by the CAD draftsman, or are they generated automatically by a vertical application or by an addon package?

5. Has anyone tried using another CAD package to plot them? (Non-AutoDesk) I have found that IntelliCAD actually fixes (not screws up as some would have us to believe) some things that put AutoCAD into the toilet. (We have a lot of older dwgs done in Cadra that have some layers with unnamed linetypes that can crash AutoCAD that IntelliCAD fixes with just a “Save” command, no Audit, etc. required. This is just one example, I’ve used it to open and recover dwgs that AutoCAD just cannot do.)

DWG TrueView is not an option. (That’s a busted crutch, an administrative nightmare.) The Dwgs just have to plot right, period.

If this is not fixed, I will have to consider modifying our CAD standards to ban the use of dynamic blocks, or if they are used that they must be exploded prior to submission and that any vendor that does not comply will be liable for all resulting damages. (Don’t anyone start ragging on not exploding blocks, not when the potential is for corrupted output. Correct output everytime, anytime, everywhere and anywhere is the only acceptable option.)

Another scary thing is that Chris Wade has found that other files in a projest get corrupted. Chris, does this occour in sheet sets or folders? Wondering what the relationship has to be for this to spread.

If this Big Friendly doesn’t come up with a quick cure, could you possibly send me one or more of the offending dwg files so that I can examine them and see what we may be facing and if there&#039;s anything that we can do to help with this?

Thanks,

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting this. </p>
<p>I am the CAD manager for one division (of nine) of a large mining company. Each of our divisions has about 10 to 40 CAD users (total of probably a couple of hunderd or more users) and we use more consultants than we have in house, add to this all of our equipment vendors. So we have thousands of CAD files and our collection is growing exponentially.</p>
<p>I see it as much more than a little dangerous, it has the potential for creating a major disaster. It is on the level that AutoDesk basically needs to do whatever it takes to fix this, it should be first priority period. </p>
<p>This goes beyond a bug, it is a major screwup, I won’t go into the potential problems that I envision, as they should be obvious. </p>
<p>I have a few questions.</p>
<p>1. I am assuming that the drawings were done in 2009 and saved to 2007 file format, is this correct?</p>
<p>2. Does saving them back to an earlier format make any difference? (Nothing to do with this, but we save to 2000 file format, this works very well for us with our outside vendors, some of whom use older versions. I see absolutly no justification at this point in time for changing this.)</p>
<p>3. Was straight AutoCAD used or one of the verticals? AutoCAD Electric?</p>
<p>4. Are the dynamic blocks involved created directly by the CAD draftsman, or are they generated automatically by a vertical application or by an addon package?</p>
<p>5. Has anyone tried using another CAD package to plot them? (Non-AutoDesk) I have found that IntelliCAD actually fixes (not screws up as some would have us to believe) some things that put AutoCAD into the toilet. (We have a lot of older dwgs done in Cadra that have some layers with unnamed linetypes that can crash AutoCAD that IntelliCAD fixes with just a “Save” command, no Audit, etc. required. This is just one example, I’ve used it to open and recover dwgs that AutoCAD just cannot do.)</p>
<p>DWG TrueView is not an option. (That’s a busted crutch, an administrative nightmare.) The Dwgs just have to plot right, period.</p>
<p>If this is not fixed, I will have to consider modifying our CAD standards to ban the use of dynamic blocks, or if they are used that they must be exploded prior to submission and that any vendor that does not comply will be liable for all resulting damages. (Don’t anyone start ragging on not exploding blocks, not when the potential is for corrupted output. Correct output everytime, anytime, everywhere and anywhere is the only acceptable option.)</p>
<p>Another scary thing is that Chris Wade has found that other files in a projest get corrupted. Chris, does this occour in sheet sets or folders? Wondering what the relationship has to be for this to spread.</p>
<p>If this Big Friendly doesn’t come up with a quick cure, could you possibly send me one or more of the offending dwg files so that I can examine them and see what we may be facing and if there&#8217;s anything that we can do to help with this?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3321</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3321</guid>
		<description>Yes, we have come accross this before, performing a drawing recovery (using Recoverall, so that you also recover the Xrefs) and then doing a purge and an audit, then save the drawing, it should work correctly from that point on. This doesn&#039;t happen with every drawing, but it seems that once one file in a project is corruptede other files in the same project become corrupted (even if the first isn&#039;t referenced by any other file).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we have come accross this before, performing a drawing recovery (using Recoverall, so that you also recover the Xrefs) and then doing a purge and an audit, then save the drawing, it should work correctly from that point on. This doesn&#8217;t happen with every drawing, but it seems that once one file in a project is corruptede other files in the same project become corrupted (even if the first isn&#8217;t referenced by any other file).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/23/older-autocad-loses-part-of-the-plot/#comment-3317</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=455#comment-3317</guid>
		<description>It definitely happens in 2007 with SP1 installed. I&#039;m away from my example drawings right now, so it will take me a couple of days to find out if 2007 SP2 still has the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It definitely happens in 2007 with SP1 installed. I&#8217;m away from my example drawings right now, so it will take me a couple of days to find out if 2007 SP2 still has the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
