<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network/standalone clash is confined to Raster Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/01/networkstandalone-clash-is-confined-to-raster-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/01/networkstandalone-clash-is-confined-to-raster-design/</link>
	<description>Mostly AutoCAD discussion, but also music, image manipulation and video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:13:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/01/networkstandalone-clash-is-confined-to-raster-design/#comment-3785</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=588#comment-3785</guid>
		<description>HOTFIX for this issue is out.

http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteID=123112&amp;id=13435443&amp;linkID=9240618</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOTFIX for this issue is out.</p>
<p><a href="http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteID=123112&#038;id=13435443&#038;linkID=9240618" rel="nofollow">http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteID=123112&#038;id=13435443&#038;linkID=9240618</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/01/networkstandalone-clash-is-confined-to-raster-design/#comment-3673</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=588#comment-3673</guid>
		<description>Chris, I&#039;ve asked the question and will pass on whatever information I can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I&#8217;ve asked the question and will pass on whatever information I can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/01/networkstandalone-clash-is-confined-to-raster-design/#comment-3668</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 06:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=588#comment-3668</guid>
		<description>So is there a timeline for this fix?  I&#039;m still waiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is there a timeline for this fix?  I&#8217;m still waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Benton</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/01/networkstandalone-clash-is-confined-to-raster-design/#comment-3611</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Benton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=588#comment-3611</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s good, because mixing licensing in this way helps many companies get the software they need at a &quot;better&quot; price.  Messing with this would be a very bad thing for Autodesk to do, even if by accident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s good, because mixing licensing in this way helps many companies get the software they need at a &#8220;better&#8221; price.  Messing with this would be a very bad thing for Autodesk to do, even if by accident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

