- blog nauseam - http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com -
AutoCAD 2013 for Mac – the holes live on
Posted By Steve Johnson On 30 July 2012 @ 9:36 pm In Apple,AutoCAD,AutoCAD 2013,Customisation,DCL,Fail,Interoperability | 20 Comments
A couple of years ago, I reported on the missing features  in AutoCAD 2011 for Mac. While some generous souls were prepared to accept something half-baked as a first attempt, even that excuse doesn’t wash when it comes to a third iteration. So how well is Autodesk doing at filling those holes? Decide for yourself. Here’s an updated list of missing features in AutoCAD 2013 for Mac:
Many of these are big-ticket, dealbreaking items. No DCL? Still? Seriously? To these we can add a whole application, Inventor Fusion, which comes as part of the AutoCAD 2013 for Windows install set. (Edit: Inventor Fusion for Mac is available to download as a Technology Preview application from Autodesk Labs  and from the Apple App Store). I don’t expect many Mac users will be heartbroken about the lack of a permanent Ribbon (although there are Ribbon-like things that come and go), but as Autodesk reckons it’s responsible for a 44% productivity boost , maybe they should be. Oh, and it isn’t supported and doesn’t work properly  on the current release of OS X.
To be fair, it’s not all one-way traffic. Here’s the list of features that appear only in AutoCAD for Mac:
Well, that’s all right, then.
We’re used to Autodesk’s unfortunate mastery of the long-term half-baked feature, but carrying on with a whole product this unfinished for three releases is more than a little embarrassing. Charging the same amount for it as real AutoCAD adds insult to injury. While I’m sure there are dozens of Mac users happy to be using anything with the AutoCAD name on it on the platform of their choice, this is not a sustainable state of affairs.
Autodesk really needs to make up its mind about this product before embarking on more Mac misadventures such as porting Revit and other products. Autodesk needs to either take AutoCAD for Mac seriously and finish it off to an acceptable standard, or kill it off as a bad idea . As there’s no sign of the former happening and Autodesk history is replete with examples of the latter, I wouldn’t suggest anybody gets too attached to running AutoCAD natively on OS X.
Source: Autodesk knowledgebase article TS15833488 .
Article printed from blog nauseam: http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com
URL to article: http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/07/30/autocad-2013-for-mac-the-holes-live-on/
URLs in this post:
 reported on the missing features: http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/10/17/autodesk-for-mac-the-hole-story/
 Technology Preview application from Autodesk Labs: http://labs.autodesk.com/technologies/fusion/
 44% productivity boost: http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/08/04/studying-autodesks-productivity-study/
 doesn’t work properly: http://usa.autodesk.com/getdoc/id=TS20109560
 bad idea: http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/29/why-autocad-for-mac-is-a-bad-idea/
 TS15833488: http://usa.autodesk.com/getdoc/id=TS15833488
Copyright © 2008-2011 cad nauseam. All rights reserved.