<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blog nauseam &#187; AutoCAD 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/category/autocad-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com</link>
	<description>Mostly AutoCAD discussion, but also music, image manipulation and video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2012 &#8211; Autodesk adds an uninstallation analgesic</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/06/01/autocad-2012-autodesk-adds-an-uninstallation-analgesic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/06/01/autocad-2012-autodesk-adds-an-uninstallation-analgesic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Autodesk Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Installation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the more painful aspects of dealing with installations of recent releases of AutoCAD and related products is that although you might run a single setup routine to install what you think is a single application, the end result is a mass of different components being installed. Each of these components is considered a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the more painful aspects of dealing with installations of recent releases of AutoCAD and related products is that although you might run a single setup routine to install what you think is a single application, the end result is a mass of different components being installed. Each of these components is considered a separate program by Windows, and needs uninstalling separately. Frankly, this is manifestly antisocial behaviour.</p>
<p>I have complained to Autodesk about this ever since it started happening, but the number of sub-installations has been getting greater rather than smaller. Now Autodesk has provided an uninstallation tool, which you can find <a title="TS17031128" href="http://usa.autodesk.com/getdoc/id=TS17031128" target="_blank">here</a>. If you download and run <a title="psebuninstalltool.exe" href="http://images.autodesk.com/adsk/files/psebuninstalltool.exe" target="_blank">psebuninstalltool.exe</a>, you will be provided with a list of applications to uninstall.</p>
<p>This is a move in the right direction, but it&#8217;s still far from ideal. You still have to choose which applications to install and which to leave alone because they&#8217;re in use by some other application, and because of the possible complexities you&#8217;re not likely to know. Get it wrong and you can break other applications in a way that&#8217;s not immediately obvious. Also, it uninstalls English language products only and is provided &#8220;as-is&#8221; as an unsupported tool.</p>
<p>This is a welcome kludge to help with a problem that shouldn&#8217;t exist. Users simply shouldn&#8217;t have to deal with this nonsense. If you install one application, you should be able to just uninstall one application and it should be gone, without breaking anything else. Autodesk, thanks for this interim assistance, but I look forward to the problem being removed in future releases, rather than partially patched over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/06/01/autocad-2012-autodesk-adds-an-uninstallation-analgesic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another language pack cleanup solution</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/07/22/another-language-pack-cleanup-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/07/22/another-language-pack-cleanup-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Autodesk Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Win]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ManuSoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owen Wengerd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My CADLock, Inc. colleague, Owen Wengerd has posted about a fix utility he has written to help clean up drawings infested with the language pack problem discussed here. I have not yet tested Owen&#8217;s utility*, but as this should run in any AutoCAD-based product from 2007 on, it could well be a better partial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://www.cadlock.com/">CADLock, Inc.</a> colleague, <a href="http://otb.manusoft.com/">Owen Wengerd</a> has <a href="http://otb.manusoft.com/2010/07/missing-language-pack-dwg-file-repair.htm">posted</a> about a fix utility he has written to help clean up drawings infested with the language pack problem <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/07/19/civil-3d-2011-anz-comes-complete-with-virus/">discussed</a> <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/07/22/partial-fix-for-language-pack-problem/">here</a>. I have not yet tested Owen&#8217;s utility*, but as this should run in any AutoCAD-based product from 2007 on, it could well be a better partial solution than Autodesk&#8217;s Civil 3D-only (so far) patches. Autodesk still needs to sort out its dodgy templates, of course, and should probably provide its own non-Civil 3D fixes, if only to maintain a little corporate self-respect.</p>
<p>As Owen has a long and distinguished history of being consistently and demonstrably better at AutoCAD programming than Autodesk&#8217;s own programmers, I&#8217;d be tempted to try this one first. However, Civil 3D users should probably apply the patches and updates anyway to help resolve other issues.</p>
<p>To find Owen&#8217;s utility, go to the <a href="http://www.manusoft.com/">ManuSoft</a> <a href="http://www.manusoft.com/software/freebies/arx.html">ARX freebies page</a> and look for CleanLanguage.zip. While you&#8217;re there, use the Software menu to check out some of the other stuff Owen has done.</p>
<p>* Edit: I have now tested it, and it works beautifully in both AutoCAD 2010 and Civil 3D 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/07/22/another-language-pack-cleanup-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ribbon poll roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/17/ribbon-poll-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/17/ribbon-poll-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 05:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Autodesk Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ribbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaan Hurley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Further to my last post, Here is a brief summary of this blog&#8217;s various poll results that relate in some way to Ribbon and CIP use. The most recent polls are at the top of the list. I have placed in bold those percentages that relate directly to the proportion of AutoCAD Ribbon use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to my <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/14/autodesks-cip-data-massively-biased/">last post</a>, Here is a brief summary of this blog&#8217;s various poll results that relate in some way to Ribbon and CIP use. The most recent polls are at the top of the list. I have placed in <strong>bold</strong> those percentages that relate directly to the proportion of AutoCAD Ribbon use among the voters on this blog.</p>
<ul>
<li>AutoCAD 2010 users&#8217;  Ribbon use: <strong>44%</strong> (AutoCAD 2010 users&#8217; CIP on: 36%)</li>
<li>Ribbon love: 28%</li>
<li>AutoCAD 2010 menu bar non-users: 23%</li>
<li>Inventor Ribbon use: 44% (Inventor 2010 users&#8217; Ribbon use: 59%)</li>
<li>Revit Ribbon use: 42% (Revit 2010 users&#8217; Ribbon use: 58%)</li>
<li>AutoCAD Ribbon use: <strong>32%</strong> (AutoCAD 2009/2010 users&#8217; Ribbon use: <strong>38%</strong>)</li>
<li>CIP on: 27%</li>
<li>AutoCAD 2009 menu bar non-users: 21%</li>
<li>AutoCAD 2009 Ribbon one of 3 best new features: 11%</li>
<li>AutoCAD 2009 Ribbon turned on in some way: <strong>29%</strong> (fully visible <strong>13%</strong>)</li>
</ul>
<p>The polls were run at different times over the past couple of years with different questions being asked in different ways about different releases, and responded to by very different numbers of voters. Don&#8217;t expect consistent or directly comparable results; this is not a scientific study. As with all polls here, there is a self-selection bias; those people who feel most strongly about a subject are more likely to find these polls and make the effort to vote in them.</p>
<p>The more recent polls generally have significantly greater sample size than the early ones. The smallest poll (AutoCAD 2009 best new features) has 37 voters, the largest poll (AutoCAD users generally using Ribbon) has 751. While the former certainly qualifies as <a href="http://autodesk.blogs.com/between_the_lines/2010/03/show-us-your-autocad-desktop.html">Shaan&#8217;s &#8220;a few dozen&#8221;</a>, the latter does only if you consider 62 to be &#8220;a few&#8221;. In which case, can I give you a thousand dollars and you give me a few hundred back?</p>
<p>Here are the poll details, which you can also see in the <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/pollsarchive/">Polls Archive</a>. If you think any of these questions or the available responses are in any way biased or leading , I&#8217;d be interested to hear your reasoning.</p>
<p><strong>AutoCAD 2010 users, what are your Ribbon and CIP settings?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 15 March 2010</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Ribbon on, CIP on <small>(24.7%, 65 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Ribbon on, CIP off <small>(19.4%, 51 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Ribbon off, CIP on <small>(11%, 29 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Ribbon off, CIP off <small>(44.9%, 118 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>Ribbon<br />
</strong>Start Date: 16 January 2010</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Love <small>(28.2%, 164 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Hate <small>(71.8%, 417 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>AutoCAD 2010 users: pull-down menus &#8211; is your menu bar turned on (MENUBAR=1)?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 14 September 2009</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes, it&#8217;s on all the time <small>(69.3%, 475 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes, it&#8217;s usually on but I sometimes turn it off <small>(4.1%, 28 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes in verticals, no in AutoCAD <small>(1.9%, 13 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes (other) <small>(1.5%, 10 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, it&#8217;s usually off but I sometimes turn it on <small>(7%, 48 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, I never use pull-downs <small>(13.7%, 94 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (other) <small>(2.5%, 17 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>Inventor users: are you generally using the Ribbon?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 11 September 2009</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes <small>(44.3%, 82 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using 2010) <small>(30.8%, 57 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using an earlier release to avoid the Ribbon) <small>(15.7%, 29 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using an earlier release for other reasons) <small>(9.2%, 17 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>Revit users: are you generally using the Ribbon?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 9 September 2009</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes <small>(41.6%, 153 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using 2010 in unsupported classic mode) <small>(30.2%, 111 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using an earlier release to avoid the Ribbon) <small>(20.4%, 75 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using an earlier release for other reasons) <small>(7.9%, 29 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>AutoCAD users: are you generally using the Ribbon?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 9 September 2009</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes <small>(32%, 240 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using 2009/10) <small>(51.1%, 384 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using an earlier release to avoid the Ribbon) <small>(11.7%, 88 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using an earlier release for other reasons) <small>(5.2%, 39 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>Do you enable CIP (Customer Involvement Program) in your Autodesk products in production?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 23 February 2009</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes, always <small>(17.9%, 74 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes, on some products/releases <small>(8.9%, 37 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, because of privacy concerns <small>(30.4%, 126 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, because of performance concers <small>(19.3%, 80 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, it is not available for me <small>(3.4%, 14 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, other <small>(20%, 83 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>AutoCAD 2009 users: pull-down menus &#8211; is your menu bar turned on (MENUBAR=1)?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 28 November 2008</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes, it&#8217;s on all the time <small>(68.3%, 136 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes, it&#8217;s usually on but I sometimes turn it off <small>(6.5%, 13 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes in verticals, no in AutoCAD <small>(2.5%, 5 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes (other) <small>(2%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, it&#8217;s usually off but I sometimes turn it on <small>(2%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, I use the menu under the big red A <small>(6.5%, 13 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, I never use pull-downs <small>(9.5%, 19 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (other) <small>(2.5%, 5 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>Choose the best things about AutoCAD 2009 (up to 3)</strong><br />
Start Date: 11 July 2008</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Ribbon <small>(10.8%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Menu Browser <small>(5.4%, 2 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Quick Access Toolbar <small>(5.4%, 2 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Smaller floating toolbars <small>(8.1%, 3 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Status bar changes <small>(8.1%, 3 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Action Recorder <small>(18.9%, 7 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Modeless layer interface <small>(18.9%, 7 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Quick View Layouts/Drawings <small>(8.1%, 3 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Quick Properties <small>(13.5%, 5 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Spell checking in text editor <small>(29.7%, 11 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Rollover tooltips for objects <small>(13.5%, 5 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Enlarged tooltips for user interface <small>(0%, 0 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">ViewCube <small>(21.6%, 8 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Steering Wheel <small>(2.7%, 1 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">ShowMotion <small>(0%, 0 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Geographic Location <small>(2.7%, 1 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">DWFx <small>(5.4%, 2 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Off-white model space background <small>(0%, 0 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Drawing recovery changes <small>(8.1%, 3 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Updated button images <small>(2.7%, 1 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">LISP bug fixes <small>(13.5%, 5 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Scale List bug fixes <small>(10.8%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Other bug fixes <small>(10.8%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Improvements available only in vertical products <small>(16.2%, 6 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Other improvements in base AutoCAD <small>(8.1%, 3 Votes)</small></li>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AutoCAD 2009 non-Ribbon users: why don&#8217;t you use it?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 20 June 2008</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Uses up too much screen space <small>(63.6%, 35 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Doesn&#8217;t make good use of my screen size/shape <small>(45.5%, 25 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Using it minimised requires an extra click/hover <small>(47.3%, 26 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Tab concept means extra clicks <small>(65.5%, 36 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Dislike concept of hiding tools &#8211; want buttons to stay visible <small>(60%, 33 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Tab switching is too slow <small>(45.5%, 25 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Button click reaction is too slow <small>(38.2%, 21 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Turning it off saves startup time <small>(30.9%, 17 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Ribbon content doesn&#8217;t match my needs <small>(43.6%, 24 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">All the commands should be on it <small>(27.3%, 15 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Express Tools are missing <small>(32.7%, 18 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Other things I use frequently are missing <small>(40%, 22 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Too hard to find things <small>(50.9%, 28 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No advantage over existing methods <small>(63.6%, 35 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Customising it is too difficult <small>(43.6%, 24 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Don&#8217;t like the colour scheme <small>(16.4%, 9 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Don&#8217;t like fuzzy text (ClearType) <small>(25.5%, 14 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Using a vertical product that doesn&#8217;t make use of the Ribbon <small>(23.6%, 13 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Want to avoid training expense/inconvenience <small>(18.2%, 10 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Want to avoid initial productivity reduction <small>(18.2%, 10 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Inconsistent with other programs we use (e.g. Office pre-2007) <small>(12.7%, 7 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Opposition to Microsoft&#8217;s influence <small>(23.6%, 13 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">I&#8217;m a Luddite and resist change for the sake of it <small>(7.3%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>AutoCAD 2009 users: in what state do you usually have your Ribbon?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 28 May 2008</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Horizontal and fully visible <small>(10.4%, 8 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Horizontal and minimised to panel titles <small>(5.2%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Horizontal and minimised to tabs <small>(7.8%, 6 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Vertical, floating and fully visible <small>(1.3%, 1 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Vertical, floating and auto-hiding <small>(0%, 0 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Vertical, docked and fully visible <small>(1.3%, 1 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Vertical, docked and auto-hiding (Anchor left or right) <small>(2.6%, 2 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Turned off <small>(71.4%, 55 Votes)</small></li>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/17/ribbon-poll-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Autodesk shows Dassault how to treat customers</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/04/30/autodesk-shows-dassault-how-to-treat-customers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/04/30/autodesk-shows-dassault-how-to-treat-customers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Win]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Pack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are areas of Autodesk&#8217;s treatment of customers that leaves much to be desired, and I will most likely continue to be critical of that until a) I die; b) Autodesk dies; or c) the bad stuff stops happening. One thing for which Autodesk deserves praise is the distribution of bug fixes to its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are areas of Autodesk&#8217;s treatment of customers that leaves much to be desired, and I will most likely continue to be critical of that until a) I die; b) Autodesk dies; or c) the bad stuff stops happening. One thing for which Autodesk deserves praise is the distribution of bug fixes to its customers, without imposing the sort of conditions that SolidWorks customers have to put up with.</p>
<ul>
<li>Do Autodesk customers need to be on Subscription to receive bug fixes? No, they do not.</li>
<li>Do Autodesk customers need to have purchased the software within the last 90 days to receive bug fixes? No, they do not.</li>
<li>Do Autodesk customers need to have reported certain specific bugs to receive bug fixes? No, they do not.</li>
<li>Do Autodesk customers <em>even need to be running the current release</em> to receive bug fixes? No, they do not.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://usa.autodesk.com/getdoc/id=DL15074619">AutoCAD 2010 Update 2</a> (that&#8217;s Service Pack 2 in the old language) has just been released for the users of last year&#8217;s software. This includes the Update 1 changes. The usual caveats apply, including reading the <a href="http://images.autodesk.com/adsk/files/autocad_2010_and_autocad_lt_2010_update_2.html">Readme</a> first. As usual, Autodesk&#8217;s oddball numbering system means that after installation, Update 1 shows up as Version 2 and Update 2 shows up as Version 3 in the About screen.</p>
<p>This Update applies to straight AutoCAD (and <a href="http://usa.autodesk.com/getdoc/id=DL15073321">LT</a>), not the vertical variants. <del datetime="2010-04-30T14:18:01+00:00">I have no news about non-English versions.</del> Patrick Emin informs me these updates are language-independent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/04/30/autodesk-shows-dassault-how-to-treat-customers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polls, especially CIP and Ribbon settings</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/22/polls-especially-cip-and-ribbon-settings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/22/polls-especially-cip-and-ribbon-settings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ribbon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I encourage all my readers to participate in the variety of polls I have made available, over towards the right of this site. In particular, if you&#8217;re a user of base AutoCAD 2010, please have a go at the AutoCAD 2010 users, what are your Ribbon and CIP settings? poll. The results so far [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I encourage all my readers to participate in the variety of polls I have made available, over towards the right of this site. In particular, if you&#8217;re a user of base AutoCAD 2010, please have a go at the <em>AutoCAD 2010 users, what are your Ribbon and CIP settings?</em> poll. The results so far are very interesting, but the numbers are currently too small to be significant. My two longest-running polls are now approaching a thousand votes each, and it would be great to see several hundred responses to the Ribbon/CIP poll.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m on the subject of polls, I&#8217;ll repeat some comments I made a while ago. Back then, I noticed that more than one person had been voting multiple times. While this is technically possible for people who have access to the Internet via multiple IP addresses, it’s obviously not desirable. The idea is that you have one vote each. While you might be able to work around that restriction to give yourself a little extra influence on the result, doing so is less than honest.</p>
<p>I accept that people who have access via home and work might accidentally vote twice on occasions, but if I perceive a continued pattern of deliberate abuse I will remove the offenders’ access rights to this site. As I respect everybody’s privacy I will not reveal any identities, drop any hints or make any announcements about this, I will just do it.</p>
<p>Just to make the privacy issue completely clear, I will not, under any circumstances in public or private, reveal who has voted for what. To anybody. Similarly, I will not reveal to any party any identifying information behind any of the users of this site, with the exception of spammers.</p>
<p>Fortunately, the influence of dodgy votes on poll results has so far been small and in most cases statistically insignificant. That is, it does not invalidate any conclusions that might be drawn from the overall poll results. The more valid votes there are, the less influence the multi-voters will have, so go to it and have your say. Once, please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/22/polls-especially-cip-and-ribbon-settings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2009 &amp; 2010 users &#8211; out of memory errors?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/10/autocad-2009-2010-users-out-of-memory-errors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/10/autocad-2009-2010-users-out-of-memory-errors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Out of memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some of the users I support have repeated out-of-memory errors while editing fairly simple drawings. I have some 2010 users who suffer from this problem while others using the same drawings on the same hardware get by without ever seeing it. When swapping users to differerent PCs, the problem seems to follow the user. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the users I support have repeated out-of-memory errors while editing fairly simple drawings. I have some 2010 users who suffer from this problem while others using the same drawings on the same hardware get by without ever seeing it. When swapping users to differerent PCs, the problem seems to follow the user. Despite various experiments, I have no idea what is going on here.</p>
<p>Is this happening to you or anybody you work with? Have you managed to work out if there is something that triggers it? Is there a user interface setting or method of drawing that you suspect of being the culprit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/10/autocad-2009-2010-users-out-of-memory-errors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>These messages are brought to you by AutoCAD</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/08/31/these-messages-are-brought-to-you-by-autocad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/08/31/these-messages-are-brought-to-you-by-autocad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Messages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few releases, and particularly in AutoCAD 2009 and 2010, I have noticed an increase in the number of information notices (bubbles, warnings, task dialogs, Communication Center notices, etc.) being displayed. Shaan Hurley has pointed out that 2010 Update 1 introduces a balloon notification that periodically makes you aware of how much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few releases, and particularly in AutoCAD 2009 and 2010, I have noticed an increase in the number of information notices (bubbles, warnings, task dialogs, Communication Center notices, etc.) being displayed. Shaan Hurley <a href="http://autodesk.blogs.com/between_the_lines/2009/08/autocad-2010-and-autocad-lt-2010-update-1-sp1-available-for-download.html">has pointed out</a> that 2010 Update 1 introduces a balloon notification that periodically makes you aware of how much time remains before your subscription expires. Is this a good thing?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a poll on the right that asks a specific question about the default state of AutoCAD 2009 and 2010, but I&#8217;d also like to see some comments on this. What do you think of these messages? Are they useful? Do they get in the way? Do you take any notice of them? Are there too many? Do we need any others? Do you turn them off? Is it easy enough to control them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/08/31/these-messages-are-brought-to-you-by-autocad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2010 Update 1</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/08/21/autocad-2010-update-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/08/21/autocad-2010-update-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Update 1, the first of Autodesk&#8217;s Updates (formerly Service Packs) for AutoCAD 2010 is now out for AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT. Equivalent updates for various verticals will follow soon. The Readme contains information about what was fixed, so I won&#8217;t reproduce that here.</p> <p>As always, read the readme first and exercise the usual paranoia. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update 1, the first of Autodesk&#8217;s Updates (formerly Service Packs) for AutoCAD 2010 is now out for <a href="http://support.autodesk.com/getdoc.asp?id=DL13760520">AutoCAD</a> and <a href="http://support.autodesk.com/getdoc.asp?id=DL13760573">AutoCAD LT</a>. Equivalent updates for various verticals will follow soon. The  <a href="http://images.autodesk.com/adsk/files/autocad_2010_and_autocad_lt_2010_update_1.html" target="_blank">Readme</a> contains information about what was fixed, so I won&#8217;t reproduce that here.</p>
<p>As always, read the readme first and exercise the <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/07/21/when-is-a-service-pack-not-a-service-pack/">usual paranoia</a>. However, my experience of the pre-release versions of this Update has been positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/08/21/autocad-2010-update-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hotfix available for Raster Design licensing issue</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/06/23/hotfix-available-for-raster-design-licensing-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/06/23/hotfix-available-for-raster-design-licensing-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Autodesk Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raster Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil 3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Brian and Rick for pointing out the availability of a hotfix for Raster Design 2010&#8242;s standalone/network license incompatibility. As a bonus, it also fixes some Raster Design / Civil 3D stability issues.</p> <p>The hotfix is available here, and as always with patches, fixes, service packs and updates, read the readme first.</p> <p>Note [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Brian and Rick for pointing out the availability of a hotfix for <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/20/autodesk-messes-up-raster-design-2010-licensing/">Raster Design 2010&#8242;s</a> <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/27/autodesk-plans-to-fix-raster-design-licensing-snafu/">standalone/network</a> <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/01/networkstandalone-clash-is-confined-to-raster-design/">license incompatibility</a>. As a bonus, it also fixes some Raster Design / Civil 3D stability issues.</p>
<p>The hotfix is available <a href="http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteID=123112&#038;id=13435443&#038;linkID=9240618">here</a>, and as always with patches, fixes, service packs and updates, read the <a href="http://images.autodesk.com/adsk/files/raster_design_2010_hotfix_for_licensing_and_civil_3d_feature_update.rtf">readme</a> first.</p>
<p>Note that although this fixes the most common scenario where a network Raster Design needs to work on a standalone AutoCAD, it does not fix the opposite scenario. So if you have a bunch of network licensed AutoCAD variants available to you and you have a standalone license of Raster Design because you&#8217;re the only person in the office who needs it, you&#8217;re still out of luck. If you&#8217;re in such a position, I think you have a very strong case for a no-cost change from standalone to network licensing for Raster Design. If you ask for this and are refused, let me know and I&#8217;ll let everyone else know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/06/23/hotfix-available-for-raster-design-licensing-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2010 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/06/16/autocad-2010-putting-things-back-to-normal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/06/16/autocad-2010-putting-things-back-to-normal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Autodesk Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Easily the most popular post on this blog, in terms of both hits and comments, is AutoCAD 2009 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;. Lots of people seemed to find it useful, so I guess it&#8217;s worth doing an updated sequel for the current release. Much of this post is the same as the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easily the most popular post on this blog, in terms of both hits and comments, is <a href="/2008/03/27/autocad-2009-putting-things-back-to-normal/">AutoCAD 2009 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;</a>. Lots of people seemed to find it useful, so I guess it&#8217;s worth doing an updated sequel for the current release. Much of this post is the same as the original, but there are differences.</p>
<p>Note: there are updated versions of this post for AutoCAD <a href="/2010/03/25/autocad-2011-putting-things-back-to-normal/">2011</a> and <a href="/2011/04/14/autocad-2012-putting-things-back-to-normal">2012</a>.</p>
<p>One thing that&#8217;s regularly asked whenever a new AutoCAD release hits the streets is how to make it work like earlier releases. As I stated in my original post, I think you should give any new features a fighting chance before turning them off or ignoring them. The 2010 Ribbon is still a Ribbon, but in my view it&#8217;s a better one than in 2009. But it&#8217;s entirely your choice. We should be grateful that in AutoCAD 2010 at least (unlike Revit 2010), you do still have that choice.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume you&#8217;ve made the decision to put your environment back to AutoCAD 2008 or earlier; how do you do it?</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Workspace</strong>. In vanilla AutoCAD, you can restore much of the user interface by just switching workspaces. In the bottom right corner, there is a little button that looks like a gearwheel. This is the Workspace control. Click on it and pick the item called <em>AutoCAD Classic</em>. If you&#8217;re using a vertical variant of AutoCAD 2010, this workspace may not be available. If so, or if you want finer control over your interface, read on.</li>
<li><strong>Pull-down Menus</strong>. Enter MENUBAR 1 to turn pull-down menus on. To turn them off again, enter MENUBAR 0.</li>
<li><strong>Toolbars</strong>. In AutoCAD 2009, you could turn individual toolbars on and off by accessing a menu obtained by right-clicking on the QAT. Autodesk (vindictively?) removed that option in 2010. That menu is still available if you right-click in an unused docked toolbar area, but if you have no toolbars visible there will be no such area available. What to do? Turn on one toolbar at the Command prompt, then you will be able to access the menu by right-clicking on the blank area to the right of it. The following command sequence will do it:
<p>_.-TOOLBAR ACAD.Standard _Top 0,0</p>
<p>Note that this will only work if you have the acad.cuix file loaded (or partially loaded). This is the case in vanilla AutoCAD and some verticals (e.g. AutoCAD Civil 3D), but it may not be the case in other verticals (e.g. AutoCAD Architecture).
</li>
<li><strong>Ribbon</strong>. You can close the Ribbon with the RibbonClose command. If you ever want to turn it back on, enter Ribbon.</li>
<li><strong>Dashboard</strong>. The AutoCAD 2007/8 Dashboard is gone, but you can have a vertical Ribbon instead. If the Ribbon is not visible (it won&#8217;t be if you just selected the <em>AutoCAD Classic</em> workspace), enter Riboon to bring it back. In the tab title row (the bar with the word <em>Home</em> in it), right-click and pick <em>Undock</em>. Now you can place and size your Dashboard-like thing as you see fit. As before, you can right-click on things to change the various settings. However, getting the contents exactly the way you want it usually involves using CUI, and that&#8217;s well outside the scope of this post.</li>
<li><strong>Graphic Background</strong>. Despite Autodesk thinking it&#8217;s a good idea to hide all the yellow lines in your drawings by giving you a creamy drawing area, many of you will want a black background. To do this, right-click on the drawing area and pick <em>Options&#8230;</em> (or just enter OP), then pick the <em>Display</em> tab. Don&#8217;t be tempted to choose <em>Color Scheme</em> and set it to <em>Dark</em>, because that just changes the appearance of various user interface elements. Instead, pick the <em>Colors&#8230;</em> button. On the left, choose a context you want to change (e.g. <em>2D model space</em>), choose the appropriate background element (e.g. <em>Uniform background</em>) and choose the particular shade that takes your fancy. There is a <em>Restore Classic Colors</em> button, but that only takes you back to AutoCAD 2008 with its white paper space. If you want a black paper space, you&#8217;ll have to specify that individually. When you&#8217;re done, pick <em>Apply &amp; Close</em>, then <em>OK</em>.</li>
<li><strong>Status bar</strong>. Right-click on a status bar button, turn off <em>Use Icons</em> and your text-based status bar buttons will return.</li>
<li><strong>Classic commands</strong>. If you prefer not to leave the various new palettes on screen all the time, old versions of various commands are still available: ClassicLayer, ClassicXref and ClassicImage. There is also a system variable LAYERDLGMODE, which when set to 0 will make the Layer command work in the old and faster modal way. If you use this setting, you can still access the new modeless layer palette with the LayerPalette command. Going back further, there are command-line methods of these commands: -Layer, -Xref, XAttach, -Image and ImageAttach.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you have allowed AutoCAD to migrate your settings (I never do), some of the above will already be done for you, but by no means all of it. Once you&#8217;re happy with your new environment, I suggest you save your workspace under a name of your choosing (Save Current As&#8230; under the gearwheel button), then export your profile in the Options command&#8217;s Profiles tab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/06/16/autocad-2010-putting-things-back-to-normal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Network/standalone clash is confined to Raster Design</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/01/networkstandalone-clash-is-confined-to-raster-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/01/networkstandalone-clash-is-confined-to-raster-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Autodesk Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raster Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Autodesk has been in touch to confirm that the failure to allow a mixed network/standalone environment is confined to Raster Design. I haven&#8217;t yet tested this myself, but I&#8217;ve been told unequivocally that you can mix standalone and network license models for the major products.</p> <p>Here is the official Autodesk response to the issue:</p> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Autodesk has been in touch to confirm that the failure to allow a mixed network/standalone environment is confined to Raster Design. I haven&#8217;t yet tested this myself, but I&#8217;ve been told unequivocally that you can mix standalone and network license models for the major products.</p>
<p>Here is the official Autodesk response to the issue:</p>
<blockquote><p>We are very aware of the issue currently relating to the co-existence of an AutoCAD SLM (stand-alone license) and AutoCAD Raster Design NLM (network license) configuration. This was not an intentional “change of licensing policy” as expressed in some blog posts this week, but an unfortunate side effect of updating our licensing technology for SLM (stand-alone) seats to be in sync with our NLM seats for all AutoCAD-based products. We can only apologize for this new behavior experienced by customers upgrade to 2010 version products.</p>
<p>We are currently pursuing a couple of options to rectify this situation. We do intend to provide a solution in the very near term and I hope you will join me in helping mitigate the frustrations expressed in various blogs this week.</p>
<p>We have also heard of speculations that this issue also impacts side-by-side installations of different AutoCAD desktops. This is not the case. Both software development and QA have successfully installed many different AutoCAD-based 2010 desktops side-by-side in mixed SLM and NLM configurations without any issues.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/01/networkstandalone-clash-is-confined-to-raster-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD&#8217;s magic vanishing attachments</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/30/autocads-magic-vanishing-attachments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/30/autocads-magic-vanishing-attachments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DGN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWFx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missing Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are now quite a few file types that you can attach to an AutoCAD drawing as a reference, in the same way that you can attach other drawings as xrefs. We&#8217;ve been able to attach other drawings since Release 11 (1990) and images since Release 14 (1997), but every release since 2007 has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are now quite a few file types that you can attach to an AutoCAD drawing as a reference, in the same way that you can attach other drawings as xrefs. We&#8217;ve been able to attach other drawings since Release 11 (1990) and images since Release 14 (1997), but every release since 2007 has introduced a new kind of attachment. In AutoCAD 2010, you can now also attach PDFs, MicroStation DGNs (v7 and v8), DWF and DWFx files.</p>
<p>But should you? Maybe not. It depends who is going to use those drawings after you. If you know for certain that every user of that drawing is going to be using 2010 and later, that&#8217;s no problem. But if there is the possibility of earlier releases being used, your fine-looking attachments could vanish silently in the night. Attach a PDF to your drawing in 2010, give it to a user of last year&#8217;s AutoCAD 2009 (you&#8217;ll need to save it as a 2007 DWG) and what will he see? Nothing. There is no text-screen warning, no bounding box, no piece of text indicating the file name, nothing. Just a blank space where there should be useful drawing content.</p>
<p>This problem isn&#8217;t new to 2010, because there are similar problems with the other recent attachment types. Let&#8217;s examine them one by one:</p>
<ul>
<li>PDF &#8211; visible only in 2010 and later (except for the special case of 2009 with the Subscription-only Bonus Pack 2).</li>
<li>DWFx &#8211; visible only in 2009 and later.</li>
<li>DGN v7 &#8211; visible only in 2009 and later.</li>
<li>DGN v8 &#8211; visible only in 2008 and later.</li>
<li>DWF &#8211; visible only in 2007 and later.</li>
</ul>
<p>It&#8217;s important to note that the attachments don&#8217;t actually disappear from the drawing. They are still stored there, even if you save to an earlier DWG format like 2000 or 2004. The attachments survive the round trip to an earlier DWG format intact; they will reappear just fine if reopened in 2010. (Round-tripping of new object types is something that Autodesk has done extremely well over the years).</p>
<p>In most cases, the objects are stored invisibly as proxy objects (object name ACAD_PROXY_ENTITY, known in the early days as zombies). In some cases, they are listed as special Underlay objects (e.g. DGNUnderlay, DWFUnderlay). In 2000 to 2006, they all list as proxies. How can you list these objects in earlier releases when you can&#8217;t see them? With a bit of LISP, or old tricks like LIST ALL Remove Crossing.</p>
<p>The moral of the story for drawing creators is to look before you leap whan attaching new object types. For drawing recipients, it&#8217;s something to carefully watch out for. If you&#8217;re the customer and you use an earlier release, you may even wish to include a don&#8217;t-use-this-attachment-type clause in your specifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/30/autocads-magic-vanishing-attachments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Autodesk plans to fix Raster Design licensing SNAFU</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/27/autodesk-plans-to-fix-raster-design-licensing-snafu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/27/autodesk-plans-to-fix-raster-design-licensing-snafu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Autodesk Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raster Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have been in touch with various people at Autodesk about Raster Design 2010&#8242;s failure to work in a mixed standalone/network environment. These people have all been suitably apologetic, they assure me it wasn&#8217;t a deliberate move on Autodesk&#8217;s part, and that moves are afoot to provide a solution fairly soon. For example:</p> <p>Our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been in touch with various people at Autodesk about <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/20/autodesk-messes-up-raster-design-2010-licensing/">Raster Design 2010&#8242;s failure</a> to work in a mixed standalone/network environment. These people have all been suitably apologetic, they assure me it wasn&#8217;t a deliberate move on Autodesk&#8217;s part, and that moves are afoot to provide a solution fairly soon. For example:</p>
<blockquote><p>Our intention was never to cause such inconvenience for our Raster customers with the licensing change.  We are currently working on a solution and hope to have more information in the coming weeks.</p></blockquote>
<p>And:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;we are very aware of the issue currently relating to the co-existence of an AutoCAD SLM and Raster Design NLM. This was not an intentional “change of licensing policy”, but an unfortunate side effect of updating our licensing technology for SLM (stand-alone) seats to be in sync with our NLM seats for all AutoCAD-based products. I can only apologize for this new behavior experienced by customers upgrade to 2010 version products.</p>
<p>We are currently pursuing a couple of options to rectify this situation. We do intend to provide a solution (fix if you will) in the very near term&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>The jury is still out about whether this problem affects only Raster Design or is a general problem that prevents a mixed standalone/network environment of AutoCAD and vertical products. If it&#8217;s a general problem, it would be an unmitigated disaster for the 2010 product range. I&#8217;m getting mixed messages about this from the Autodesk people, but I don&#8217;t want to make an issue of that because the people involved are trying to help by providing what information they have as quickly as possible. As soon as I have accurate information available to me I will pass it on.</p>
<p>I know of at least one person who is unable to get a mixed AutoCAD and Revit MEP environment working. If you have tried to get AutoCAD 2010 and another 2010 vertical product working side by side where one is standalone and the other network, please add your experiences to the comments here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/27/autodesk-plans-to-fix-raster-design-licensing-snafu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Autodesk messes up Raster Design 2010 licensing</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/20/autodesk-messes-up-raster-design-2010-licensing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/20/autodesk-messes-up-raster-design-2010-licensing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Autodesk Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raster Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idiocy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was horrified to learn (in this Autodesk Discussion Group thread) that Autodesk has changed the rules as far as the way Raster Design licenses are handled. It&#8217;s quite possible that Autodesk has also done this with other products that I&#8217;m not yet aware of. If so, please comment and let me know.</p> <p>If [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was horrified to learn (in <a href="http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=724322&amp;tstart=0">this Autodesk Discussion Group thread</a>) that Autodesk has changed the rules as far as the way Raster Design licenses are handled. It&#8217;s quite possible that Autodesk has also done this with other products that I&#8217;m not yet aware of. If so, please comment and let me know.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not familiar with Raster Design, it&#8217;s an Autodesk add-on that adds raster handling capabilities to AutoCAD and AutoCAD-based products. The change that has been introduced is that the licensing method of AutoCAD and Raster Design now has to match. That is, if your AutoCAD is standalone, the network version of Raster Design won&#8217;t run on it, and vice versa.</p>
<p>Why does this matter? Let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re a CAD Manager in this scenario:</p>
<p>You have a hundred AutoCAD users, half of which are full-time users with standalone licenses and the other half who are mainly part-time users with network licenses. Let&#8217;s say that some of those users (of both types) have a very occasional need to use the features in Raster Design. You bought one network license of the product a few releases ago and have everything on Subscription, just the way Autodesk wants it. So far, you&#8217;ve been able to provide the Raster Design option to all of your users. Only one user at a time can use it, but as use of the product is pretty rare, this hasn&#8217;t been a problem to date. If demand increased, other licenses could be added as needed.</p>
<p>Now, with Raster Design 2010, this is no longer possible. Your network license will not be available to your standalone users. You have the following options:</p>
<ol>
<li>Buy 50 standalone licenses of Raster Design 2010 for your standalone AutoCAD 2010 users, i.e. spend a huge amount of money on software that will go unused more than 99% of the time. Oh, and commit more money to maintaining that software with Subscription.</li>
<li>Convert all your AutoCAD licenses from standalone to network. This is not a free service. Last time I looked, it cost about 20% of the retail price of a new seat. That means you will need to waste a huge amount of money changing your AutoCAD licenses to work in a way that is an inferior match with the way you do business. If you&#8217;ve already provided AutoCAD 2010 to your standalone users, you&#8217;ll need to uninstall them all and reinstall them as network versions. Won&#8217;t that be fun?</li>
<li>Upgrade neither AutoCAD or Raster Design to 2010 and stick with the release you&#8217;ve got, i.e. waste a large amount of pre-paid Subscription money.</li>
<li>Do without Raster Design altogether, i.e. waste the money you&#8217;ve spent on the product purchase and Subscription. In this case, you&#8217;ll probably need to put some time, effort and further expenditure into investigating and buying third-party alternatives that have a sane network licensing policy. Who said Autodesk is hard on its third-party developers? Look, it&#8217;s actively drumming up business for them!</li>
</ol>
<p>Wow. This, in an environment where people are looking to <em>save</em> money. It doesn&#8217;t matter what efforts the Raster Design developers have put into improving the product. Raster Design could do twice as much stuff, twice as well, in half the time, while looking prettier and playing a tune. For many customers, this licensing decision has rendered the product unusable, so none of that stuff will matter. Why did you bother, people?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s such a spectacularly stupid move that it&#8217;s hard to comprehend that anybody within Autodesk could even seriously contemplate the idea, let alone allow it to get through to the finished product. Here are my top ten reasons why this is dumb <em>even from Autodesk&#8217;s point of view</em>:</p>
<ol>
<li>It adds another unnecessary pain point to CAD Managers. These are generally the people who are currently working out whether to upgrade, pay for Subscription, or stick with what they have and pay Autodesk nothing, so they are the people Autodesk should be most careful to avoid hurting.</li>
<li>It will discourage some people from using the current release of the products.</li>
<li>It will discourage other people from keeping their Subscription current.</li>
<li>It will encourage some customers to ask for their money back for Raster Design, Subscription or both. If this is refused, it could even lead to another bad-publicity court case.</li>
<li>It is a negative example people will use when deciding whether Autodesk can be trusted to do the right thing by its customers, once they are all tied into Subscription.</li>
<li>It will discourage people who may have been interested in Raster Design from buying it.</li>
<li>It will discourage people from investing in any other Autodesk add-on software in future.</li>
<li>It will increase the perception that Autodesk doesn&#8217;t care about its customers and is always looking out for sneaky cash grabs.</li>
<li>It will increase the perception that Autodesk is clueless about how its products are used in the real world.</li>
<li>It distracts from the generally positive news about the AutoCAD 2010 product family. I&#8217;ve got some nice things to say about AutoCAD 2010, but I&#8217;m writing this instead.</li>
</ol>
<p>Autodesk, this is a particularly nasty anti-customer move, and that&#8217;s the polite way of putting it. I stongly advise you to reverse this decision. I don&#8217;t care if you&#8217;ve made it technically difficult for yourself to do so; just do it. Please.</p>
<p><em>Disclosure: the above scenario is not a million miles from the situation in which I find myself. So it&#8217;s something that directly affects me. But it&#8217;s something so dumb and annoying that I&#8217;d still be ranting about it, even if that were not the case.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/20/autodesk-messes-up-raster-design-2010-licensing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guillermo Melantoni&#8217;s 3D blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/16/guillermo-melantonis-3d-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/16/guillermo-melantonis-3d-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What a Mesh is another new Autodesk blog, this time from Autodesk 3D guru Guillermo Melantoni. You may remember Guillermo mentioning his forthcoming blog in my A gaggle of geeks video, and now it has arrived. You can also see Guillermo in action in several videos about AutoCAD 2010&#8242;s new 3D mesh capabilities on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://whatamesh.typepad.com/">What a Mesh</a> is another new Autodesk blog, this time from Autodesk 3D guru Guillermo Melantoni. You may remember Guillermo mentioning his forthcoming blog in my <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/27/a-gaggle-of-geeks/">A gaggle of geeks</a> video, and now it has arrived. You can also see Guillermo in action in several videos about AutoCAD 2010&#8242;s new 3D mesh capabilities on <a href="http://autocad.autodesk.com/">AutoCAD Exchange</a>.</p>
<p>Guillermo is very, very smart, he expertly uses the products he develops (the building on the AutoCAD 2010 packaging was done by him), and it&#8217;s great to see him interacting with users in this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/16/guillermo-melantonis-3d-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2010 &#8211; Turning off InfoCenter</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/03/autocad-2010-turning-off-infocenter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/03/autocad-2010-turning-off-infocenter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 06:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InfoCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsgroups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Off Switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I generally avoid the still-awful Autodesk discussion groups these days, but I do hop in from time to time in the vain hope of seeing some improvement. In doing so, I occasionally pick up a gem, and that happened today. I think this one deserves a wider audience, so here it is.</p> <p>In AutoCAD [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I generally avoid the still-awful Autodesk discussion groups these days, but I do hop in from time to time in the vain hope of seeing some improvement. In doing so, I occasionally pick up a gem, and that happened today. I think this one deserves a wider audience, so here it is.</p>
<blockquote><p>In AutoCAD 2010, you can disable the InfoCenter toolbar by opening the<br />
registry, and going to the following key:</p>
<p>HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Autodesk\AutoCAD\R18.0\ACAD-8001:409\InfoCenter</p>
<p>In that key there&#8217;s a value with the name &#8220;InfoCenterOn&#8221;.</p>
<p>Changing that value from 1 to 0 will disable the InfoCenter toolbar.</p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.caddzone.com">Tony Tanzillo</a> in <a href="http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=6155221&#038;">this thread</a>. Note that the &#8220;ACAD-8001&#8243; part will be different if you use a vertical variant of AutoCAD.</p>
<p>Why would you want to do this? To improve startup times and reduce annoyance. Autodesk should have provided a better mechanism for doing this. The absence of convenient, designed-in off switches for new features is something I&#8217;ve complained about on many occasions over the years. Autodesk&#8217;s response has been patchy.</p>
<p><em>Edit</em>: I just noticed <a href="http://otb.manusoft.com/2009/03/disable-infocenter-in-autocad-2010.htm">Owen Wengerd has posted</a> about this, including a LISP routine to simplify the process of turning it on and off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/03/autocad-2010-turning-off-infocenter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some thoughts on AutoCAD Exchange</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/03/25/some-thoughts-on-autocad-exchange/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/03/25/some-thoughts-on-autocad-exchange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melanie Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve added a link to Autodesk&#8217;s new AutoCAD community site, AutoCAD Exchange. As with most things Autodesk, there are pros and cons. Here are my first impressions.</p> <p>I think it looks good in a Vista-black kind of way. I know some of you don&#8217;t like the black look in software, but I do. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve added a link to Autodesk&#8217;s new AutoCAD community site, <a href="http://autocad.autodesk.com/">AutoCAD Exchange</a>. As with most things Autodesk, there are pros and cons. Here are my first impressions.</p>
<p>I think it looks good in a Vista-black kind of way. I know some of you don&#8217;t like the black look in software, but I do. The layout looks a bit cluttered and confused at first, but I&#8217;m sure visitors will quickly get used to where to find things. The site appears to be designed around 1024-wide resolution. If you have more than this, as most CAD users do, then there are wide areas of wasted space either side of the good stuff.</p>
<p>The front page is basically a teaser. To get to the useful content or do pretty much anything, you need to register or sign in. I don&#8217;t particularly like this, and it gives the impression (false or not) that Autodesk wants to own and control you, even if you&#8217;re just <em>viewing</em> a site. The registration process is the same as for other Autodesk sites such as the discussion groups, so if you have an Autodesk identity, you&#8217;re already registered.</p>
<p>As it is a &#8220;community&#8221; site, on first sign-in you are invited to fill in more details, provide an avatar and so on. Some people might not like this, but it&#8217;s optional and Autodesk knows where I live so it makes no difference to me. I know where Autodesk lives, too. It has yet to be seen if Autodesk manages to develop a real community on this site, and if so, how open that community is allowed to be.</p>
<p>Autodesk is encouraging bloggers to add an Autodesk Exchange widget to their blogs. I won&#8217;t be adding one in a permanent position because this is my blog and not Autodesk&#8217;s. I kind of like my independence, and if a company wants space on my blog they can pay for it. Anyway, the widget is available in three sizes and here&#8217;s what the largest one looks like:</p>
<p><iframe src='http://autocad.autodesk.com/?nd=w01&#038;i=373' width='300' height='330' frameborder='0' scrolling='no'></iframe></p>
<p>I&#8217;m likely to appear in one of those little interview videos soon, as they were shot during the bloggers&#8217; visit to San Fransisco in early February. When you do get to see it, yes, that&#8217;s really me (and Melanie Perry) saying nice things about AutoCAD 2010, it&#8217;s not computer generated. Except for the background, that is, which <em>is</em> computer generated. It was bright green in real life. Other than that, no deception, lies, arm-twisting or bribes were involved. Oh, unless you count the free trip to San Fransisco as a bribe. I interviewed Autodesk, they interviewed me, and I actually had positive things to say about AutoCAD 2010. More on that later.</p>
<p>AutoCAD Exchange is an important and potentially very useful site for AutoCAD users. Check it out, and if you feel like it, report back. You can pretty much say what you like here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/03/25/some-thoughts-on-autocad-exchange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A gaggle of geeks</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/27/a-gaggle-of-geeks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/27/a-gaggle-of-geeks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cohn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donnie Gladfelter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dorks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ellen Finklestein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guillermo Melantoni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heidi Hewett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynn Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Douglas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Stein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melanie Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robin Capper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaan Hurley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Shackelford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Time to lighten things up a bit, I think. While attending the AutoCAD 2010 product launch in San Francisco on 5 February 2009, I conducted a series of micro-interviews with a collection of AutoCAD bloggers and Autodesk employees. One geek asks 14 other geeks if they are geeks; nothing too serious here. I hope [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to lighten things up a bit, I think. While attending the AutoCAD 2010 product launch in San Francisco on 5 February 2009, I conducted a series of micro-interviews with a collection of AutoCAD bloggers and Autodesk employees. One geek asks 14 other geeks if they are geeks; nothing too serious here. I hope Shaan enjoys my tabloid journalist editing job right at the end.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QKUK4_U9RKc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QKUK4_U9RKc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKUK4_U9RKc">YouTube link</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks to all the interviewees:</p>
<p><a href="http://heidihewett.blogs.com/">Heidi Hewett</a>, Autodesk blogger<br />
<a href="http://blogs.autodesk.com/lynn">Lynn Allen</a>, Autodesk blogger<br />
<a href="http://mistressofthedorkness.blogspot.com/">Melanie Perry</a>, blogger<br />
<a href="http://rcd.typepad.com/rcd/">Robin Capper</a>, blogger<br />
<a href="http://cadablog.blogspot.com/">Brian Benton</a>, blogger<br />
<a href="http://cadshack.blogspot.com/">Todd Shackelford</a>, blogger<br />
Jon Page, Autodesk person<br />
<a href="http://steinsspot.blogspot.com/">Matt Stein</a>, Autodesk person and personal blogger<br />
<a href="http://autodesk.blogs.com/between_the_lines/">Shaan Hurley</a>, Autodesk blogger<br />
<a href="http://www.thecadgeek.com/blog/">Donnie Gladfelter</a>, blogger<br />
<a href="http://www.ellenfinkelstein.com">Ellen Finklestein</a>, blogger<br />
<a href="http://cadman-do.blogspot.com">David</a> <a href="http://revit-up.blogspot.com/">Cohn</a>, blogger<br />
<a href="http://mdouglas.blogs.com/">Mark Douglas</a>, blogger<br />
Guillermo Melantoni, Autodesk person (still waiting for that blog, Guillermo!)</p>
<p>What <em>is</em> the collective noun for geeks, anyway? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/27/a-gaggle-of-geeks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2010 &#8211; Will you miss the Menu Browser?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/20/autocad-2010-will-you-miss-the-menu-browser/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/20/autocad-2010-will-you-miss-the-menu-browser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve closed the poll that asked AutoCAD 2009 users about their MENUBAR setting. It&#8217;s very clear that pull-down menus are still very much in use in the Ribboned world of post-2008 AutoCAD. In AutoCAD 2009, an attempt was made to provide access to pull-down menus without sacrificing that strip of screen real estate. That [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve closed the <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/pollsarchive/">poll</a> that asked AutoCAD 2009 users about their MENUBAR setting. It&#8217;s very clear that pull-down menus are still very much in use in the Ribboned world of post-2008 AutoCAD. In AutoCAD 2009, an attempt was made to provide access to pull-down menus without sacrificing that strip of screen real estate. That attempt was called the Menu Browser, it was one of the thing you could find under the Big Red A, and it really <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/18/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-19-menu-browser/">didn&#8217;t work very well</a>. In AutoCAD 2010, the Menu Browser has gone away. The A hasn&#8217;t gone away, just the ability to access pull-down menus through it.</p>
<p>There are some who have expressed a deep dislike of the Big Red A, although it never offended me greatly. I just wished the features hidden under it worked better than they did in 2009. Personally, I generally prefer what&#8217;s under the A in 2010 than what&#8217;s there in 2009, but you may not. I know that when the 2009 user interface was being attacked, its most prominent defenders were those keyboard-heavy users who turned both the Ribbon and the menu bar off, giving themselves more screen space. On the infrequent occasions when a pull-down menu was required, those people were content to provide an extra click.</p>
<p>When I found out about the Menu Browser&#8217;s death a few months ago, I expected there would be a severe adverse reaction from such people. Maybe there will be one when people hold get the shipping product and notice it&#8217;s gone. But after my poll showed only 7% of respondents used it instead of the menu bar, I&#8217;m now expecting that adverse reaction to be smaller than I originally thought.</p>
<p>If you want to use AutoCAD 2010, want to work without a menu bar but still have access to menu items occasionally, what can you do? You can add a button to the Quick Access Toolbar (QAT), or any other toolbar, that toggles the menu bar on and off. Use the CUI command to add such a button.* The following macro will do the job:</p>
<p><code>'menubar $M=$(-,1,$(getvar,menubar)) </code></p>
<p>There are a couple of downsides to this method. First, although this macro has been written in such a way that it should be transparent, it doesn&#8217;t currently work that way. When you push the button, AutoCAD will still cancel any command you&#8217;re in. Second, the screen resize forces a redraw, which could slow you down in very complex drawings. However, under most circumstances that redraw will still be quicker than waiting for a reaction from AutoCAD the first time you pick the Big Red A. By the way, that reaction time is better in 2010 than the very tardy 2009. As a result, even AutoCAD 2009 users might prefer to use the QAT-button method and forget the Menu Browser ever existed.</p>
<p>* If there is enough interest, I will do a video tutorial explaining how to add such a button to the QAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/20/autocad-2010-will-you-miss-the-menu-browser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2010 release date</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/13/autocad-2010-release-date/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/13/autocad-2010-release-date/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navel Gazing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[12-Month Release Cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Release date]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After my recent attendance at the AutoCAD 2010 launch, I have a few dozen subjects I&#8217;d like to blog about, lots of video editing to do, and not enough free time in which to do it. Many of my fellow launch-attending bloggers have beaten me to it with many of the meaty bits, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After my recent attendance at the AutoCAD 2010 launch, I have a few dozen subjects I&#8217;d like to blog about, lots of video editing to do, and not enough free time in which to do it. Many of my fellow launch-attending bloggers have beaten me to it with many of the meaty bits, but I&#8217;ll be covering much of that stuff in my own way and from my own perspective over the next few weeks.</p>
<p>One thing I <em>can</em> do with minimum effort is to pass on an important piece of information I haven&#8217;t seen mentioned elsewhere yet: the date that Autodesk plans to actually ship AutoCAD 2010. That date is (drumroll)&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Tuesday, 24 March 2009</strong></p>
<p>No great surprises there; the 12-month release cycle continues as usual. </p>
<p>Although this information was imparted to a room full of bloggers in an on-the-record session, I suspect it may have slipped out accidentally. It&#8217;s a <em>planned</em> date and may yet change subject to various circumstances. It applies to AutoCAD and probably AutoCAD LT; the vertical variants of AutoCAD will have later ship dates, probably in mid-April.</p>
<p>Interestingly, in a conversation with an Autodesk Australia person today, I was told that the 2010 launch dates are staggered across the globe. (That&#8217;s <em>launch</em> dates, not ship dates). So although everybody in Australia with an Internet connection already knows what&#8217;s in AutoCAD 2010, Autodesk Australia itself is apparently not allowed to disclose any information about it until Monday, 23 March 2009. That&#8217;s kind of bizarre if true, and I suspect it may be based on some kind of misunderstanding, but that&#8217;s what I was told.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/13/autocad-2010-release-date/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

