<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for blog nauseam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com</link>
	<description>Mostly AutoCAD discussion, but also music, image manipulation and video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:48:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AutoCAD 2013 &#8211; An Autodesk Help writer responds by Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/04/06/autocad-2013-an-autodesk-help-writer-responds/#comment-11222</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1838#comment-11222</guid>
		<description>While Dieter didn&#039;t get much response last time he asked for feedback on the Autodesk forums, and while those forums have gone downhill since then, I agree that it&#039;s probably worth another try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Dieter didn&#8217;t get much response last time he asked for feedback on the Autodesk forums, and while those forums have gone downhill since then, I agree that it&#8217;s probably worth another try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trebling upgrade prices was not enough for Autodesk by Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/05/10/trebling-upgrade-prices-was-not-enough-for-autodesk/#comment-11221</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1867#comment-11221</guid>
		<description>Peter, you know you can easily change those, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, you know you can easily change those, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AutoCAD 2012 &#8211; Autoloader mechanism for plug-ins by Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/04/20/autocad-2012-autoloader-mechanism-for-plug-ins/#comment-11220</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1451#comment-11220</guid>
		<description>James, thanks. Which link do you mean? the ones I tried work for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, thanks. Which link do you mean? the ones I tried work for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AutoCAD 2013 &#8211; An Autodesk Help writer responds by R.K. McSwain</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/04/06/autocad-2013-an-autodesk-help-writer-responds/#comment-11217</link>
		<dc:creator>R.K. McSwain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1838#comment-11217</guid>
		<description>Lastly, Dieter and Steve... this turned out to be a great conversation (122 comments so far), but the format isn&#039;t exactly the best (blog comments) and only 0.00x% of users know this is here....

How about a place to discuss issues such as this and get real feedback from Autodesk employees who have the authority to make decisions and make stuff happen (like Dieter making that addition to the Help file!)  

[Autodesk forums.....hint, hint]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lastly, Dieter and Steve&#8230; this turned out to be a great conversation (122 comments so far), but the format isn&#8217;t exactly the best (blog comments) and only 0.00x% of users know this is here&#8230;.</p>
<p>How about a place to discuss issues such as this and get real feedback from Autodesk employees who have the authority to make decisions and make stuff happen (like Dieter making that addition to the Help file!)  </p>
<p>[Autodesk forums.....hint, hint]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AutoCAD 2013 &#8211; An Autodesk Help writer responds by R.K. McSwain</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/04/06/autocad-2013-an-autodesk-help-writer-responds/#comment-11216</link>
		<dc:creator>R.K. McSwain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1838#comment-11216</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dieter. The reason I brought this up is because this very issue came up in the AUGI forums ( http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?139464-Mouse-Wheel-Zoom-Factor-AutoCAD-2013 )....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dieter. The reason I brought this up is because this very issue came up in the AUGI forums ( <a href="http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?139464-Mouse-Wheel-Zoom-Factor-AutoCAD-2013" rel="nofollow">http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?139464-Mouse-Wheel-Zoom-Factor-AutoCAD-2013</a> )&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trebling upgrade prices was not enough for Autodesk by R.K. McSwain</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/05/10/trebling-upgrade-prices-was-not-enough-for-autodesk/#comment-11215</link>
		<dc:creator>R.K. McSwain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1867#comment-11215</guid>
		<description>Really? Background color and the grid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? Background color and the grid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trebling upgrade prices was not enough for Autodesk by Don Bartz</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/05/10/trebling-upgrade-prices-was-not-enough-for-autodesk/#comment-11214</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Bartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1867#comment-11214</guid>
		<description>I have been reading, with a lot of interest, the recent posts.
The company I work for is small. Only 2 engineers. The compnay itself is 168 years old. AutoCAD has been the only program we use. We draw in 2D and have toyed with looking into 3D but not seriously. We have a lot of drawings as you could imagine.
The problem is what do you do? The owners probably won&#039;t even look at the cloud that AutoDesk is talking about. It seems like AutoDesk doesn&#039;t care about all the small companies that use their product. It almost seems that they sre going to do what &quot;they&quot; think is best for them no matter what the outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading, with a lot of interest, the recent posts.<br />
The company I work for is small. Only 2 engineers. The compnay itself is 168 years old. AutoCAD has been the only program we use. We draw in 2D and have toyed with looking into 3D but not seriously. We have a lot of drawings as you could imagine.<br />
The problem is what do you do? The owners probably won&#8217;t even look at the cloud that AutoDesk is talking about. It seems like AutoDesk doesn&#8217;t care about all the small companies that use their product. It almost seems that they sre going to do what &#8220;they&#8221; think is best for them no matter what the outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trebling upgrade prices was not enough for Autodesk by James Maeding</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/05/10/trebling-upgrade-prices-was-not-enough-for-autodesk/#comment-11211</link>
		<dc:creator>James Maeding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1867#comment-11211</guid>
		<description>While the competition develops, what Autodesk is doing is to make its tools more of a risky investment. You buy a few seats needed when a bigger project comes along, and there is risk that you will not need them when the project is over, or is put on hold.
Meanwhile, the cost per seat is going up.
So the way most people handle this is to minimize risk, which means minimize what autodesk products you buy and depend on. This is tough for companies that do not have R&amp;D money to find cheaper solutions.
You talk about shattered trust, there is none left on the Autodesk front. Its the wild west and you better be sure the features you think will work, actually do.
The odd thing is the technical people at Autodesk are great to work with, and do care, but they live under non-technical pressures. The end result is businees people encouraging us to rely on their expensive products less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the competition develops, what Autodesk is doing is to make its tools more of a risky investment. You buy a few seats needed when a bigger project comes along, and there is risk that you will not need them when the project is over, or is put on hold.<br />
Meanwhile, the cost per seat is going up.<br />
So the way most people handle this is to minimize risk, which means minimize what autodesk products you buy and depend on. This is tough for companies that do not have R&amp;D money to find cheaper solutions.<br />
You talk about shattered trust, there is none left on the Autodesk front. Its the wild west and you better be sure the features you think will work, actually do.<br />
The odd thing is the technical people at Autodesk are great to work with, and do care, but they live under non-technical pressures. The end result is businees people encouraging us to rely on their expensive products less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AutoCAD 2012 &#8211; Autoloader mechanism for plug-ins by James</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/04/20/autocad-2012-autoloader-mechanism-for-plug-ins/#comment-11210</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1451#comment-11210</guid>
		<description>Hey Steve, noticed your comments over on kean walmsley&#039;s blog about restricted access to the Exchange Apps web page - i.e. only being able to access it through AutoCAD. The link below seems to work. Sadly your typical AutoCAD user won&#039;t be directed there.

http://apps.exchange.autodesk.com/ACD/Home/Index

I whole-heartedly agree with you regarding help for AutoCAD 2013 - it has gone backwards. Online help should be online help, press F1 and it should simply launch your default web browser and go to the relevant page. I&#039;m pretty sure this is HTML 101. I&#039;m not going to bother much with the 2013 help until they fix it - if i take a cynical view, perhaps we&#039;re waiting for someone to write it :-)

p.s. There seems to be something wrong with the url link to this post from the main page, i had to edit it to get in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve, noticed your comments over on kean walmsley&#8217;s blog about restricted access to the Exchange Apps web page &#8211; i.e. only being able to access it through AutoCAD. The link below seems to work. Sadly your typical AutoCAD user won&#8217;t be directed there.</p>
<p><a href="http://apps.exchange.autodesk.com/ACD/Home/Index" rel="nofollow">http://apps.exchange.autodesk.com/ACD/Home/Index</a></p>
<p>I whole-heartedly agree with you regarding help for AutoCAD 2013 &#8211; it has gone backwards. Online help should be online help, press F1 and it should simply launch your default web browser and go to the relevant page. I&#8217;m pretty sure this is HTML 101. I&#8217;m not going to bother much with the 2013 help until they fix it &#8211; if i take a cynical view, perhaps we&#8217;re waiting for someone to write it <img src='http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>p.s. There seems to be something wrong with the url link to this post from the main page, i had to edit it to get in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trebling upgrade prices was not enough for Autodesk by Peter Norwood</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/05/10/trebling-upgrade-prices-was-not-enough-for-autodesk/#comment-11205</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Norwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 22:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1867#comment-11205</guid>
		<description>All we have to do is not buy the upgrade for a few years.

Autodesk will drop the price

I upgrade every 3 or 4 years, sooner if the price is lower.

For my own part I really hate the grey screen the paper grid and the toolbar/dashboard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All we have to do is not buy the upgrade for a few years.</p>
<p>Autodesk will drop the price</p>
<p>I upgrade every 3 or 4 years, sooner if the price is lower.</p>
<p>For my own part I really hate the grey screen the paper grid and the toolbar/dashboard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AutoCAD 2013 &#8211; Download the trial without Akamai by Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/03/28/autocad-2013-download-the-trial-without-akamai/#comment-11202</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 01:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1786#comment-11202</guid>
		<description>I have no idea, sorry. Have a go with Opera, that&#039;s a quick download and it seems to work well at circumventing Autodesk&#039;s failed attempts to be clever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea, sorry. Have a go with Opera, that&#8217;s a quick download and it seems to work well at circumventing Autodesk&#8217;s failed attempts to be clever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AutoCAD 2013 &#8211; Download the trial without Akamai by santy</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/03/28/autocad-2013-download-the-trial-without-akamai/#comment-11200</link>
		<dc:creator>santy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 16:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1786#comment-11200</guid>
		<description>Hi I followed your steps one to one to download vercion of prueva .. but after rejecting the Akamai downloader ago i gave click sends me an error page is not how do I hope you can help me thanks,,, ,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I followed your steps one to one to download vercion of prueva .. but after rejecting the Akamai downloader ago i gave click sends me an error page is not how do I hope you can help me thanks,,, ,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AutoCAD 2013 &#8211; An Autodesk Help writer responds by Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/04/06/autocad-2013-an-autodesk-help-writer-responds/#comment-11196</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 13:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1838#comment-11196</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I didn&#039;t answer that question earlier. Yes, please submit a request, I&#039;m missing the old in-out thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I didn&#8217;t answer that question earlier. Yes, please submit a request, I&#8217;m missing the old in-out thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trebling upgrade prices was not enough for Autodesk by R. Paul Waddington</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/05/10/trebling-upgrade-prices-was-not-enough-for-autodesk/#comment-11194</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Paul Waddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 02:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1867#comment-11194</guid>
		<description>Plawton, I agree.

I also have often spoken in similar ways; indeed also floating the idea of what I refer to as co-operative CAD. That is a CAD developer owned and operated in the form of a co-operative similar to existing businesses in the agricultrual arena.

I&#039;m with you on this one; the trick is now who and how to get it going?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plawton, I agree.</p>
<p>I also have often spoken in similar ways; indeed also floating the idea of what I refer to as co-operative CAD. That is a CAD developer owned and operated in the form of a co-operative similar to existing businesses in the agricultrual arena.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you on this one; the trick is now who and how to get it going?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trebling upgrade prices was not enough for Autodesk by plawton</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/05/10/trebling-upgrade-prices-was-not-enough-for-autodesk/#comment-11190</link>
		<dc:creator>plawton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1867#comment-11190</guid>
		<description>All:

I&#039;ve been saying it for over a decade:  The ONLY way to win is to buy ADSK shares - PERIOD.  

If all 1,000,000 suffering users buy just one share per week (today about $30 each), in 2 years, we will collectively own 100,000,000 shares, more than enough to take control of the company (239,000,000 shares outstanding).

We should form a new &#039;AOGI&#039; - Autodesk Owner&#039;s Group International, whose ultimate goal is to make Autodesk a user-owned company.  From there, we can change the release cycle from every year to every 4 years, and demand that the software work as advertised.

Be warned, however:  The stock will no longer pay cash dividends - indeed, as an investor, you may not see any increase in the value of your 100 shares of stock, once this stupid subscription (&#039;leech&#039;) business model is gone.  The dividend will not be direct profit, it will instead be lower levels of aggravation at work, higher productivity, fewer hardware upgrades, less re-training.  In fact, such a user-owned company would benefit employers so much that they too should become investors - the ROI is easy to see and quantify.

In fact, it may be inevitable that the new User-Owned Autodesk become a non-profit - it would save tremendously on taxes, of course, and Autodesk would finally become a good corporate citizen.  As you are doubtless aware, in their scramble to become a &quot;billion dollar company&quot; (Carol Bartz, 199?), they have ended up costing the industries they &quot;serve&quot; many times that in utterly unrecoverable time, wasted on &#039;upgrades&#039; (aka &#039;musical icons&#039;), patches, increased hardware requirements, training costs, and reduced productivity.  The 1,000 employes of Autdesk should not dictate the fate of the millions of users who continuously send them cash, only to have most requests for improvement completely ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been saying it for over a decade:  The ONLY way to win is to buy ADSK shares &#8211; PERIOD.  </p>
<p>If all 1,000,000 suffering users buy just one share per week (today about $30 each), in 2 years, we will collectively own 100,000,000 shares, more than enough to take control of the company (239,000,000 shares outstanding).</p>
<p>We should form a new &#8216;AOGI&#8217; &#8211; Autodesk Owner&#8217;s Group International, whose ultimate goal is to make Autodesk a user-owned company.  From there, we can change the release cycle from every year to every 4 years, and demand that the software work as advertised.</p>
<p>Be warned, however:  The stock will no longer pay cash dividends &#8211; indeed, as an investor, you may not see any increase in the value of your 100 shares of stock, once this stupid subscription (&#8216;leech&#8217;) business model is gone.  The dividend will not be direct profit, it will instead be lower levels of aggravation at work, higher productivity, fewer hardware upgrades, less re-training.  In fact, such a user-owned company would benefit employers so much that they too should become investors &#8211; the ROI is easy to see and quantify.</p>
<p>In fact, it may be inevitable that the new User-Owned Autodesk become a non-profit &#8211; it would save tremendously on taxes, of course, and Autodesk would finally become a good corporate citizen.  As you are doubtless aware, in their scramble to become a &#8220;billion dollar company&#8221; (Carol Bartz, 199?), they have ended up costing the industries they &#8220;serve&#8221; many times that in utterly unrecoverable time, wasted on &#8216;upgrades&#8217; (aka &#8216;musical icons&#8217;), patches, increased hardware requirements, training costs, and reduced productivity.  The 1,000 employes of Autdesk should not dictate the fate of the millions of users who continuously send them cash, only to have most requests for improvement completely ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AutoCAD 2013 &#8211; An Autodesk Help writer responds by Dieter Schlaepfer</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/04/06/autocad-2013-an-autodesk-help-writer-responds/#comment-11188</link>
		<dc:creator>Dieter Schlaepfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1838#comment-11188</guid>
		<description>Good question, Steve. Let me get back to you on that. 

Also, how important to you is retaining access to legacy ZOOMFACTOR behavior? Do you want me to submit a request?

Thanks,
Dieter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question, Steve. Let me get back to you on that. </p>
<p>Also, how important to you is retaining access to legacy ZOOMFACTOR behavior? Do you want me to submit a request?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Dieter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AutoCAD 2013 &#8211; An Autodesk Help writer responds by Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/04/06/autocad-2013-an-autodesk-help-writer-responds/#comment-11184</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 01:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1838#comment-11184</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Dieter. For those users who can&#039;t (or won&#039;t) use online Help, will there be periodical updates to the offline Help too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Dieter. For those users who can&#8217;t (or won&#8217;t) use online Help, will there be periodical updates to the offline Help too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trebling upgrade prices was not enough for Autodesk by ralphg</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/05/10/trebling-upgrade-prices-was-not-enough-for-autodesk/#comment-11183</link>
		<dc:creator>ralphg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1867#comment-11183</guid>
		<description>Not quite a national CAD system. The government is funding a Russian 3D modeling kernel, on which Russian firms can build their software. Which is a bit odd, since ASCON of St Petersburg already has a made-in-Russia kernel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite a national CAD system. The government is funding a Russian 3D modeling kernel, on which Russian firms can build their software. Which is a bit odd, since ASCON of St Petersburg already has a made-in-Russia kernel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AutoCAD 2013 &#8211; An Autodesk Help writer responds by Dieter Schlaepfer</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/04/06/autocad-2013-an-autodesk-help-writer-responds/#comment-11180</link>
		<dc:creator>Dieter Schlaepfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1838#comment-11180</guid>
		<description>Ok, fair enough, Steve. 

Here&#039;s what I just added to the documentation a few minutes ago for the ZOOMFACTOR system variable. You will see this note in the next online Help update.

   NOTE In contrast to versions prior to AutoCAD 2013-based products, the result of zooming in and
   out by the same number of mouse wheel notches results in no net change to the magnification.

Would you like me to submit your request for a ZOOMFACTORLEGACY system variable?

Dieter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, fair enough, Steve. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I just added to the documentation a few minutes ago for the ZOOMFACTOR system variable. You will see this note in the next online Help update.</p>
<p>   NOTE In contrast to versions prior to AutoCAD 2013-based products, the result of zooming in and<br />
   out by the same number of mouse wheel notches results in no net change to the magnification.</p>
<p>Would you like me to submit your request for a ZOOMFACTORLEGACY system variable?</p>
<p>Dieter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AutoCAD 2013 &#8211; An Autodesk Help writer responds by Dieter Schlaepfer</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2012/04/06/autocad-2013-an-autodesk-help-writer-responds/#comment-11179</link>
		<dc:creator>Dieter Schlaepfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1838#comment-11179</guid>
		<description>Paul,

I checked into this to confirm whether there was a change from AutoCAD 2012. There isn&#039;t. The only time that CIP cannot be turned off is for beta and trial versions. However, when a product is registered you can control whether you want to participate in CIP.

Also, if you have another Autodesk product installed that you&#039;ve opted into CIP, it automatically opts you in for the others, although I&#039;m not familiar with the nuances.

Dieter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>I checked into this to confirm whether there was a change from AutoCAD 2012. There isn&#8217;t. The only time that CIP cannot be turned off is for beta and trial versions. However, when a product is registered you can control whether you want to participate in CIP.</p>
<p>Also, if you have another Autodesk product installed that you&#8217;ve opted into CIP, it automatically opts you in for the others, although I&#8217;m not familiar with the nuances.</p>
<p>Dieter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

