<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blog nauseam &#187; User Interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/tag/user-interface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com</link>
	<description>Mostly AutoCAD discussion, but also music, image manipulation and video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The worst feature ever added to AutoCAD is&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/11/09/the-worst-feature-ever-added-to-autocad-is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/11/09/the-worst-feature-ever-added-to-autocad-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action Recorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ribbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;the Ribbon, according to your selections in the What are the worst features ever added to AutoCAD? poll. As in the best ever poll, the winner (loser?) in this race had no serious competition. I&#8217;ve listed eleven top (bottom?) features here rather than ten, partly because the popular (unpopular?) choice Memory Overuse isn&#8217;t exactly a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;the <strong>Ribbon</strong>, according to your selections in the <em>What are the worst features ever added to AutoCAD?</em> <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/pollsarchive/" target="_blank">poll</a>. As in the <a href="/2011/11/07/the-best-feature-ever-added-to-autocad-is/" target="_blank">best ever</a> poll, the winner (loser?) in this race had no serious competition. I&#8217;ve listed eleven top (bottom?) features here rather than ten, partly because the popular (unpopular?) choice <em>Memory Overuse</em> isn&#8217;t exactly a feature. But it&#8217;s mainly because I&#8217;d hate to see <a href="/2008/04/09/autocad-2009-action-recorder-needs-action/" target="_blank">Action Recorder</a> unfairly miss out on a well-deserved mention.</p>
<ul>
<li>Ribbon (30%)</li>
<li>CUI (20%)</li>
<li>Help (on line / 2012) (18%)</li>
<li>Memory Overuse (17%)</li>
<li>AutoCAD Today (2000i/2002) (16%)</li>
<li>White / Cream Drawing Background (16%)</li>
<li>Unreconciled Layers (16%)</li>
<li>Nudge (10%)</li>
<li>Blipmode (9%)</li>
<li>Proxy Object Compatibility (9%)</li>
<li>Action Recorder (8%)</li>
</ul>
<p>Given the <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/autocad-2009-why-do-you-hate-the-ribbon/" target="_blank">reception</a> the <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/tag/ribbon/" target="_blank">Ribbon</a> received when it was introduced, maybe it&#8217;s unsurprising to see it top the lists here. Cloud observers may find it interesting to note that that Autodesk&#8217;s attempt to move AutoCAD&#8217;s Help on line has been very poorly received. Yo Autodesk with your Cloud an&#8217; all, I&#8217;m really happy for you, I&#8217;ma let you finish, but on-line Help has been voted one of the worst features of all time! <em>Of all time!</em></p>
<p>The dislike of the intrusive, useful-to-some but short-lived AutoCAD Today feature remains strong a decade later. Light drawing backgrounds remain unpopular, which should not be a surprise to anyone, except maybe some people at Autodesk who thought it was a good idea to rehash old mistakes in a new and exciting way (&#8220;This time it&#8217;s <em>magnolia!</em>&#8220;). History, doomed to repeat, etc.</p>
<p>As for poor old Action Recorder, that has to be the ultimate brochure feature. It&#8217;s something for Autodesk to boast about rather than something for customers to actually use; &#8220;We responded to customer requests and fulfilled AUGI wishlists for a macro recorder!&#8221; Well, you did, kind of, by giving us something that&#8217;s about as useful as a chocolate fireguard. Looks nice, though. Autodesk, please try again, but this time do it properly.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to note that the &#8220;worst ever&#8221; list is significantly younger than the &#8220;best ever&#8221; list. Only poor old blipmode is truly ancient. Only a single &#8220;best&#8221; feature (dynamic blocks) comes from AutoCAD 2006 or later. (In fact, that&#8217;s the only feature in the &#8220;best&#8221; list that was even introduced this century). In comparison, most of the &#8220;worst&#8221; list comes from AutoCAD 2006 or later, including the top (bottom?) three. So what does <em>that</em> tell you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/11/09/the-worst-feature-ever-added-to-autocad-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2012 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/04/14/autocad-2012-putting-things-back-to-normal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/04/14/autocad-2012-putting-things-back-to-normal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClassicArray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Autodesk Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The most popular post on this blog, in terms of both hits and comments, is AutoCAD 2009 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;. This is followed by AutoCAD 2010 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;, with AutoCAD 2011 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221; not too far behind. As it seems many people find [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most popular post on this blog, in terms of both hits and comments, is <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/27/autocad-2009-putting-things-back-to-normal/">AutoCAD 2009 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;</a>. This is followed by <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/06/16/autocad-2010-putting-things-back-to-normal/">AutoCAD 2010 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;</a>, with <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/25/autocad-2011-putting-things-back-to-normal/">AutoCAD 2011 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;</a> not too far behind. As it seems many people find these posts useful, here&#8217;s an updated version for the latest release. Much of this post is based on older versions, but there are many additions and differences in this year&#8217;s &#8220;keep off my lawn&#8221; post.</p>
<p>One thing that&#8217;s regularly asked whenever a new AutoCAD release hits the streets is how to make it work like earlier releases. As I stated in my original post, I think you should give any new features a fighting chance before turning them off or ignoring them. But it&#8217;s entirely your choice. We should be grateful that in AutoCAD 2012 at least (unlike some Autodesk products), you do still have that choice. At least, you have a choice in most cases.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume you&#8217;ve made the decision to put your environment back to AutoCAD 2008 or earlier; how do you do it? I&#8217;ve arranged these items in alphabetical order:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Aerial View</strong>. The DSVIEWER command appears to be gone, but it&#8217;s just hiding. It has been undefined. You can use REDEFINE DSVIEWER to turn it back on, or just enter .DSVIEWER (with a leading period). It may not work perfectly on all systems under all circumstances.</li>
<li><strong>Array dialog box</strong>. The excellent new associative array features of AutoCAD 2012 have come at the cost of the Array dialog box. While you can use the Ribbon or the Properties palette to modify arrays, if you want to create one you have to go back to the future with a Release 14-style user interface. Using -Array doesn&#8217;t give you a dialog box, just the old-style command line. There&#8217;s nothing available in standard AutoCAD 2012 to give you a dialog box interface, which is why I created <a href="http://www.classicarray.com/">ClassicArray</a>™. It also makes it easier to create non-associative arrays, if that&#8217;s what you prefer. This plug-in has the further fortunate side-effect of acting as a workaround for several of the new Array command&#8217;s various bugs, limitations and design issues.<br />
<em>Edit: Applying <a href="http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteID=123112&amp;id=17692441&amp;linkID=9240618" target="_blank">SP1</a> to AutoCAD 2012 adds an ARRAYCLASSIC command that restores the previous dialog box. This does not provide access to any of the new features; you will still need <a href="http://www.classicarray.com/">ClassicArray</a> for that.</em></li>
<li><strong>Autocomplete</strong>. Old-timers may well find this feature useful, but if it&#8217;s getting in your way, turning it off is as simple as AUTOCOMPLETE OFF. There are a variety of settings you can selectively turn off individually if you prefer.</li>
<li><strong>Blips</strong>. The BLIPMODE command has been undefined, but you can use REDEFINE BLIPMODE to turn it back on, or just enter .BLIPMODE (with a leading period).</li>
<li><strong>Classic commands</strong>. If you prefer not to leave the various new palettes on screen all the time, old versions of various commands are still available: ClassicLayer, ClassicXref and ClassicImage. (Autodesk deprecated these commands in 2011 and 2012, which I think is a really bad idea). There is also a system variable LAYERDLGMODE, which when set to 0 will make the Layer command work in the old (and faster) modal way. If you use this setting, you can still access the new modeless layer palette with the LayerPalette command. Going back further, there are command-line methods of using these commands: -Layer, -Xref, XAttach, -Image and ImageAttach. For 2012, Autodesk has removed the Group command&#8217;s dialog box interface. If you want the dialog box, you now need to use the ClassicGroup command instead.</li>
<li><strong>Crosshairs</strong>. Want 100% crosshairs? Many people do. As before, use the Options command&#8217;s Display tab and look towards the bottom right, or use the CURSORSIZE system variable.</li>
<li><strong>Dashboard</strong>. The AutoCAD 2007/8 Dashboard is gone, but you can have a vertical Ribbon instead. If the Ribbon is not visible (it won&#8217;t be if you just selected the <em>AutoCAD Classic</em> workspace), enter Ribbon to bring it back. In the tab title row (the bar with the word <em>Home</em> in it), right-click and pick <em>Undock</em>. Now you can place and size your Dashboard-like thing as you see fit. As before, you can right-click on things to change the various settings. However, getting the contents exactly the way you want it usually involves using CUI, and that&#8217;s well outside the scope of this post.</li>
<li><strong>Dynamic Input</strong>. If Dynamic Input slows you down, you can turn it off with the status bar toggle or F12. If you like the general idea but don&#8217;t like some parts of it, there are lots of options available in the <em>Dynamic Input</em> tab of the DSettings command to enable you to control it to a fine degree. You can also get at this by right-clicking the Dynamic Input status bar button and picking <em>Settings&#8230;</em> As an example of the sort of thing you might do in there, the default of using relative coordinates is difficult for long-termers to get used to. To turn it off, pick the <em>Settings&#8230;</em> button in the <em>Pointer Input</em> panel, pick <em>Absolute coordinates</em>, then OK twice. There are a whole range of DYNxxx system variables for controlling this stuff.</li>
<li><strong>Graphic Background</strong>. Autodesk has half-listened to users&#8217; pleas for a black background by giving you a nearly black one (RGB 33,40,48 rather than 0,0,0), in model space only. Many of you will want a real black background to provide better contrast. To do this, invoke the Options command (right-click on the drawing area and pick <em>Options&#8230;</em> or just enter OP), then pick the <em>Display</em> tab. Don&#8217;t be tempted to choose <em>Color Scheme</em> and set it to <em>Dark</em>, because that just changes the appearance of various user interface elements. Instead, pick the <em>Colors&#8230;</em> button. This will put you in the Drawing Window Colors dialog box. On the left, choose a context you want to change (e.g. <em>2D model space</em>), choose the appropriate background element (e.g. <em>Uniform background</em>) and choose the particular shade that takes your fancy. There is a <em>Restore Classic Colors</em> button, but that only takes you back to AutoCAD 2008 with its black model and white paper space. If you want a black paper space background too, you&#8217;ll have to pick the <em>Sheet / layout</em> context and specify that individually. You may wish to put the Command line &gt; Command line history background setting to white, too. When you&#8217;re done, pick <em>Apply &amp; Close</em>, then <em>OK</em>.</li>
<li><strong>Grid</strong>. I generally prefer the new line-based grid. If you use isometric snap and grid, you will find that AutoCAD 2012&#8242;s line-based isometric grid is still as broken as it was in earlier releases, so you&#8217;ll need to use dots. If that applies to you or you just don&#8217;t like the lines, right-click on the Grid status button and pick Settings&#8230;, which will take you into the Drafting Settings dialog box, which you can also get at with the DSettings command, or DS for short. In the Snap and Grid tab, the grid is controlled by the options on the right. If you want your dots back, turn on the toggles in the <em>Grid style</em> section. This can also be done using the GRIDSTYLE system variable. If you don&#8217;t like the fact that the grid is now on by default in new drawings, this is set on a drawing-by-drawing basis and is therefore controlled by your template drawings. If you use AutoCAD&#8217;s supplied templates, you will need to open them individually and turn off the grid in each one.</li>
<li><strong>Hatch dialog box</strong>. If you want the Ribbon on but prefer the old Hatch dialog box, set HPDLGMODE to 1.</li>
<li><strong>Hatch double-click</strong>. If you&#8217;re not using the new Ribbon-based hatch editing feature, you will probably want to invoke the HatchEdit command when you double-click on a hatch object. Doing this involves braving the CUI interface, but I have gone into <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/10/restoring-hatch-double-click-in-autocad-2011/">step-by-step detail of that process here</a>. In short, you need to drag and drop the Hatch Edit command from the bottom left CUI panel onto the double-click action for Hatch in the top left panel, replacing the default action (Properties).</li>
<li><strong>Help</strong>. If you want your Help to work with adequate speed and reliability, or to work at all in some proxy server environments, you will want to turn off AutoCAD 2012&#8242;s online help. Go into Options &gt; System, then look in the bottom right pane to turn off the <em>Use online help</em> toggle. Even with online help turned off, you&#8217;re stuck with the unfortunate new browser-based AutoCAD Exchange interface for your Help. There is no sign yet of Autodesk coming to the rescue with a set of CHM-based Help files as was done for AutoCAD 2011, which is a real shame. The VLIDE Help is still partially broken, because Autodesk doesn&#8217;t care about customers who use LISP for development. While you&#8217;re in Options, you may also wish to turn off AutoCAD&#8217;s insistence on firing up Internet Explorer, that is if you dislike IE or have security concerns.</li>
<li><strong>Initial Setup</strong>. Don&#8217;t bother looking for this, it has been removed from the product. Can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m heartbroken about that.</li>
<li><strong>NavBar</strong>. If you like the new NavBar feature as much as I do, you&#8217;ll want to turn it off. You can close it easily using the little X in its top left corner. Alternatively, control it with the NAVBARDISPLAY system variable (0 for off, 1 for on)</li>
<li><strong>Pull-down Menus</strong>. Enter MENUBAR 1 to turn pull-down menus on. To turn them off again, enter MENUBAR 0.</li>
<li><strong>Ribbon</strong>. You can close the Ribbon with the RibbonClose command. If you ever want to turn it back on, enter Ribbon.</li>
<li><strong>Screen menu</strong>. The SCREENMENU command has been undefined, but you can use REDEFINE SCREENMENU to turn it back on, or just enter .SCREENMENU (with a leading period). However, you can&#8217;t access the screen menu section in CUI any more, so if you want to maintain your screen menu you will need to do it in an earlier release.</li>
<li><strong>Selection Cycling</strong>. Depending on your preference and/or system graphic performance, you may wish to turn off selection cycling (set SELECTIONCYCLING to 0), or at least the list that appears when selecting objects that lie on top of each other (set SELECTIONCYCLING to 1).</li>
<li><strong>Selection Preview</strong>. This feature annoys some users, adding as it does an unfortunate degree of stickiness and working inaccurately when Snap is in use. This is controlled in the <em>Selection</em> tab of the Options command. Turn off the toggles in the <em>Selection preview</em> panel on the left (these control the SELECTIONPREVIEW system variable). If you dislike the coloured boxes you get while doing a Window or Crossing, pick the <em>Visual Effect Settings&#8230;</em> button and turn off the <em>Indicate selection area</em> toggle. This controls the SELECTIONAREA system variable.</li>
<li><strong>Snap</strong>. AutoCAD 2012&#8242;s snap no longer works while there is no command active. There is no setting available to turn this feature off. If you want to move your cursor around and see the cursor snapping to precise locations to see if objects line up (e.g. in schematic diagrams), you will need to invoke a command first (e.g. L [Enter]) and ignore the command as you&#8217;re moving around on screen.<br />
<em>Edit: Applying <a href="http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteID=123112&amp;id=17692441&amp;linkID=9240618" target="_blank">SP1</a> to AutoCAD 2012 adds new system variable (SNAPGRIDLEGACY) that allows you to have your snap active at the command prompt.</em></li>
<li><strong>Startup performance</strong>. You may have noticed that AutoCAD 2012&#8242;s Ribbon switching performance is finally as it should have been from the start; practically instantaneous. You may also have noticed that when you start AutoCAD, the cursor is sticky for a while after the Command prompt is available. These two items are not unrelated; AutoCAD is loading Ribbon components in the background. If you would prefer this not to happen, set the RIBBONBGLOAD system variable to 0.</li>
<li><strong>Status bar</strong>. Right-click on a status bar button, turn off <em>Use Icons</em> and your old text-based status bar buttons will return. If you have no use for some of the new status bar toggles, right-click on one, pick <em>Display</em>, then turn off what you don&#8217;t need.</li>
<li><strong>Toolbars</strong>. In AutoCAD 2009, you could turn individual toolbars on and off by accessing a menu obtained by right-clicking on the QAT. Autodesk somewhat vindictively removed that option in 2010, and it&#8217;s still gone in 2012. That toolbar-toggling menu is still available if you right-click in an unused docked toolbar area, but if you have no toolbars visible there will be no such area available. What to do? Turn on one toolbar at the Command prompt, then you will be able to access the menu by right-clicking on the blank area to the right of it. The following command sequence will do it:<br />
<code>_.-TOOLBAR ACAD.Standard _Top 0,0</code><br />
Paste this into AutoCAD&#8217;s command line area and the Standard toolbar will be turned on above your drawing area. This will leave a grey area to the right that you can right-click into. The other toolbars will be in sub-menus under that, with the main set of default ones in the AutoCAD section. Note that this will only work if you have the acad.cuix file loaded (or partially loaded). This is the case in vanilla AutoCAD and some verticals, but it may not be the case in other verticals. As I don&#8217;t have access to such verticals, I&#8217;m afraid I can&#8217;t offer much advice here.<br />
If you&#8217;re like me, you may well discover that this is moot because AutoCAD 2012 automatically turns on a full set of toolbars, in addition to the Ribbon, the second time you run AutoCAD. This bug occurs when there&#8217;s another release already installed and you don&#8217;t use Migration. It&#8217;s easily fixed (that is if you <em>want</em> to fix it) by switching to the workspace of your choice (see below).</li>
<li><strong>Tooltips</strong>. Excessively intrusive and oversized tooltips were a &#8220;feature&#8221; of AutoCAD 2009&#8242;s revamped UI design, and we&#8217;ve been plagued with them ever since. I&#8217;m glad to see that many of them have had their verbosity somewhat curtailed in 2012, but they still annoy the heck out of me, particularly by obscuring what I&#8217;m trying to see in dialog boxes. To kill them with fire, see Options &gt; Display and start turning off toggles about half way down the left side.</li>
<li><strong>Trace</strong>. The TRACE command has been undefined, but you can use REDEFINE TRACE to turn it back on, or just enter .TRACE (with a leading period).</li>
<li><strong>UCS Icon</strong>. Don&#8217;t like the new simplified UCS icon? Sorry! While you can use the UCSIcon command&#8217;s Properties option to change the appearance of the icon in various ways, there&#8217;s nothing to restore the UCS Icon&#8217;s appearance from previous releases with its little arrows pointing the way. This information isn&#8217;t totally useless, because at least it will save you the time and effort involved in finding this out for yourself.</li>
<li><strong>Vertical variants&#8217; AutoCAD profile</strong>. Apparently, some AutoCAD 2012 vertical variants don&#8217;t have a shortcut for running them as AutoCAD. If you want to make one, first check in Options &gt; Profiles to see if there is a profile called &#8220;AutoCAD&#8221; or similar. If not, you will need to create one, reset it, and hope for the best. Sorry, I don&#8217;t have all the variants to check. Now, make a copy of your AutoCAD variant&#8217;s desktop shortcut and rename it as something like &#8220;AutoCAD 2012&#8243;. Then right-click on the copy and pick Properties. In the Target edit box, check to see if there is a /p switch followed by a profile name inside quotes. If there is, replace the existing profile name with &#8220;AutoCAD&#8221; or whatever the profile name is that you discovered or created in Options. If there isn&#8217;t a /p switch, add one. The end result should look something like this (there may be extra switches):<br />
<code>"C:\Program Files\Autodesk\[product name]\acad.exe" /p "AutoCAD"</code><br />
Once you have ensured there&#8217;s a /p &#8220;AutoCAD&#8221; (or similar) on the end of the Target, pick OK. You should then be able to start your vertical variant as AutoCAD.</li>
<li><strong>ViewCube</strong>. I like the ViewCube concept, and I think it&#8217;s a great piece of interface design. But not everybody agrees. It has caused performance issues and it&#8217;s not very useful for 2D users. If you want it gone, that&#8217;s a surprisingly difficult thing to find out about. The simplest way to remove it is by clicking the [-] button in the top left corner of the drawing area and tuening off the ViewCube toggle there. If you want more control, it&#8217;s handled using the Options command, in the 3D Modeling tab, in the bottom left corner. Turn off those toggles that don&#8217;t make sense for you. There is a related set of system variables called NAVVCUBExxx.</li>
<li><strong>Workspace</strong>. In vanilla AutoCAD, you can restore much of the user interface by just switching workspaces. The main Workspace control is now located near the top right corner. If you have turned this off (right-click, <em>Remove from Quick Access Toolbar</em>) or if you just prefer working with interface elements in the same place year by year, there is another Workspace control in the bottom right corner. This is a little button that looks like a gearwheel. In either case, click on the Workspace control and pick the item called <em>AutoCAD Classic</em>. This will perform some of the steps described above, but not all of them, so I suggest you skim the whole lot to see what else you might want to do. If you&#8217;re using a vertical variant of AutoCAD 2012, this workspace may not be available, or it may only be available if you when using an &#8220;AutoCAD&#8221; profile (see above). If it&#8217;s not available at all, you&#8217;ll need to make your own classic workspace by manually setting up your interface the way you like it, then saving it as a Workspace using the <em>Save Current As&#8230;</em> option under one of the Workspace controls.</li>
<li><strong>Xref fading</strong>. Don&#8217;t like your xrefs looking different? Use the Options command&#8217;s <em>Display</em> tab and look at the Xref display slider on the bottom right, or use the XDWGFADECTL system variable.</li>
<li><strong>Zoom Animation</strong>. If you prefer your zooms to be instant rather than progressing from one view to another in an animated series of steps, you can turn off that feature using the VTOPTIONS command or the VTENABLE system variable.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you have allowed AutoCAD to migrate your settings (I never do), some of the above will already be done for you, but by no means all of it. If past experience is anything to go by, the job done by Migration will probably be imperfect.</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;re happy with your new environment, I suggest you save your workspace under a name of your choosing (Save Current As&#8230; under a Workspace control), then export your profile in the Options command&#8217;s Profiles tab. Keep a safe copy of both your exported profile and your main CUIX file (acad.cuix by default), because that is where new workspaces are stored.</p>
<p>All of this advice is offered on an as-is, try-it-yourself-and see-what-happens basis. Unfortunately, I can&#8217;t check to see which parts of this post relate to AutoCAD for Mac (when the 2012 version arrives), AutoCAD LT (much of it will be the same), the various AutoCAD-based vertical variants (almost all of it should be the same). AutoCAD WS is, of course, nothing like real AutoCAD so none of this post will be relevant. Please comment to let me know if you find something you think I should modify or include.</p>
<p>Let me just end by saying that Autodesk generally does an excellent job of keeping long-term AutoCAD users happy by allowing them to keep working in the way that they prefer. There are exceptions, and this record has been damaged slightly by 2012, but conservative users are still better off with new releases of AutoCAD than they are with, say, Microsoft Word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/04/14/autocad-2012-putting-things-back-to-normal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2012 &#8211; How&#8217;s the Help now?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/03/25/autocad-2012-hows-the-help-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/03/25/autocad-2012-hows-the-help-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You may have noticed that the much-derided AutoCAD 2011 Help has had something of an update for AutoCAD 2012, integrating it with something called Autodesk Exchange. Rather than critique this myself, I&#8217;ll hand it over to you.</p> <p>What do you think of AutoCAD 2012&#8242;s Help? Is it all better now? Is it fast, accurate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have noticed that the much-derided AutoCAD 2011 Help has had something of an update for AutoCAD 2012, integrating it with something called Autodesk Exchange. Rather than critique this myself, I&#8217;ll hand it over to you.</p>
<p>What do you think of AutoCAD 2012&#8242;s Help? Is it all better now? Is it fast, accurate and easy to use with a useful search facility? Or do you hate it and hope someone at Autodesk is scrambling to create a CHM version of it like last year? Please comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/03/25/autocad-2012-hows-the-help-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2012 &#8211; ClassicArray Beta</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/03/25/autocad-2012-classicarray-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/03/25/autocad-2012-classicarray-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClassicArray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Array]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beta software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dialog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>People have already started to notice that AutoCAD 2012 has killed the dialog box interface for the Array command, and not everybody is happy about it. So I guess it&#8217;s time to launch ClassicArray™ Beta.</p> <p>ClassicArray is an add-on for AutoCAD 2012 for Windows that allows the creation of arrays using a dialog box interface similar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have already <a href="http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/AutoCAD-2012/Array-Function/td-p/2963766" target="_blank">started to notice</a> that AutoCAD 2012 has killed the dialog box interface for the Array command, and not everybody is happy about it. So I guess it&#8217;s time to launch ClassicArray™ Beta.</p>
<p>ClassicArray is an add-on for AutoCAD 2012 for Windows that allows the creation of arrays using a dialog box interface similar to that provided in AutoCAD from 2000 to 2011, but enhanced to include new AutoCAD 2012 functionality. I <del>will create another post later</del> have created a <a href="http://www.cadnauseam.com/products/classicarray/help/ClassicArrayHelp.htm" target="_blank">Help page</a> that describes ClassicArray more fully, but for now here are the commands ClassicArray adds to AutoCAD:</p>
<p>ClassicArray (short form CA)<br />
ClassicArrayRect (short form CAR)<br />
ClassicArrayPolar (short form CAP)<br />
ClassicArraypAth (short form CAA)</p>
<p>In addition, there are the same names with N appended, which default to creating non-associative arrays. For example, ClassicArraypAthN (short form CAAN) will create a non-associative path array. However, it is easy to create associative or non-associative arrays of any type, whatever command you use to start it. Toolbar and Ribbon buttons are provided. Help is <del>currently non-functional</del> now <a href="http://www.cadnauseam.com/products/classicarray/help/ClassicArrayHelp.htm" target="_blank">complete</a>. This pre-release software is time-bombed, meaning it will no longer work after the date shown below.</p>
<p>Here it is to download:</p>
<p><a title="ClassicArray zip file" href="http://www.cadnauseam.com/products/classicarray/ClassicArray.1.0.0.zip">ClassicArray.1.0.0.zip</a> (Shipping product &#8211; 850 KB &#8211; will not create arrays after 15 day evaluation period<br />
<del>ClassicArray.0.7.0.zip (Release Candidate 2 &#8211; 850 KB &#8211; will not create arrays after 15 day evaluation period)</del><br />
<del datetime="2011-04-13T08:00:45+00:00">ClassicArray.0.6.0.zip (Release Candidate &#8211; 787 KB &#8211; will not work after 28 April 2011)</del><br />
<del>ClassicArray.0.5.0.zip (49 KB &#8211; will not work after 21 April 2011)</del><br />
<del>ClassicArray.0.4.2.zip (48 KB &#8211; will not work after 14 April 2011)</del></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a <del>small</del> zip file; unzip it and <del>read the readme to see what to do with it</del> run the setup routine of your choice, depending on whether you want to install it for just the current user or for all users. <del>Installation is a matter of simply copying a folder to a specific location; uninstallation is simply a matter of removing that folder.</del> The mechanism I used for this is AutoCAD 2012&#8242;s new Plug-In feature. This feature is A Good Thing that deserves to be described more fully, which I intend to do when I get the time.</p>
<p>This is pre-release software. It generally works fine, but it will contain bugs. Please let me know about them, either in a comment here or using my <a href="http://www.cadnauseam.com/Email.htm" target="_blank">email form</a>. Over time, I expect to update this post with later versions, so I would appreciate it if you let me know the version number along with any other relevant information, such as the AutoCAD variant and OS you have installed it on. If you have any suggestions, of even if it works without problems, please feel free to let me know that, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2011/03/25/autocad-2012-classicarray-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Autodesk discussion group changes &#8211; user reaction</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/06/30/autodesk-discussion-group-changes-user-reaction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/06/30/autodesk-discussion-group-changes-user-reaction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discussion groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I will be airing my own views on the Autodesk discussion group changes in a future post. In the meantime, I have collected some reactions from other users. For the record, there has been only a little censorship in this area. Here are some of the comments that made it through unhindered:</p> I&#8217;ve given it a fair shake [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be airing my own views on the Autodesk discussion group changes in a future post. In the meantime, I have collected some reactions from other users. For the record, there has been only a little censorship in this area. Here are some of the comments that made it through unhindered:</p>
<ul>
<li>I&#8217;ve given it a fair shake and it&#8217;s just as bad as I imagined</li>
<li>Goodbye, people. It was nice while it lasted</li>
<li>it sucks</li>
<li>it doesn&#8217;t look like you have any intention to meet the expectations of these people</li>
<li>not [as] much traffic as there was before the change.  I hope things improve</li>
<li>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve noticed the sourness many folks are having with this interface</li>
<li>What a f&#8217;in f-up</li>
<li>This is so aggravating that I am resorting to posting questions that may have already been answered vs. trying to find them via the search tool</li>
<li>Very annoying</li>
<li>We use NNTP because it&#8217;s easy and fast, and better</li>
<li>very slow, compared to &#8220;other&#8221; html forums</li>
<li>This was hyped as a &#8220;state-of-art web experience&#8221;. It is clearly not</li>
<li>Extremely slow compared to the previous web forum</li>
<li>we are screwed with this interface</li>
<li>This is like having your high performance vehicle (NNTP) stolen and having to take the bus to get to your destination</li>
<li>4 days later, still sucks</li>
<li>Still very slow, cumbersome, difficult to track and navigate, unintuitive</li>
<li>It took me literally 30 seconds to get that smiley to insert</li>
<li>I really was expecting something better</li>
<li>I see too many people who may not be around anymore. In most cases their expertise far outweighs any improvements to the forums</li>
<li>Welcome to the new and improved Autodesk forum brought to you by high school students near you</li>
<li>You keep using that word ["upgrade"]. I do not think it means what you think it means</li>
<li>Better? Wanna bet? It&#8217;s cumbersome, at best</li>
<li>Another annoying thing here is that I can&#8217;t seem to find a way to show threading</li>
<li>Very, VERRRY slow, compared to forums using PHP and the like</li>
<li>Why even have an edit feature at all, when it&#8217;s virtually useless?</li>
<li>the &#8220;experts&#8221; are being alienated and having a harder time contributing to aid the beginners</li>
<li>I don&#8217;t like reading this forum in a browser. NNTP was and is much better</li>
<li>This sucks</li>
<li>about 40 unanswerable questions that have popped up in the first 30 (wasted) minutes of trying to &#8220;give it a chance&#8221;</li>
<li>If we aren&#8217;t going to get our newsgroups back at least attempt to make this forum professional</li>
<li>Sorry folks but I just don&#8217;t have the time to log in and browse thru all the different pages required now</li>
<li>Map 3d is &#8220;losing&#8221; its best contributor because of a dumb forum update</li>
<li>Autodesk prove again if something works  they will find something to make wrong</li>
<li>I stopped posting here after the change for the same reasons.  Just logged in for this</li>
<li>since the demise of the NNTP feed I rarely visit several of the forums I used to watch</li>
<li>It is just too time consuming now. This is really discouraging</li>
<li>I cannot be nearly as productive as I could with a newsreader&#8230;it takes no less than 4-5x longer</li>
<li>getting rid of the NNTP server was one of the worst things Autodesk has done in years</li>
<li>Goodbye</li>
<li>your update and support policy really force me into alternatives to Autodesk</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s going down well, then. To be fair, there have been a few people who are relatively supportive of at least some of the changes. As usual with any unpopular change, there are a couple of asinine comments attacking the critics as just a bunch of old whiners who are resistant to all change. But the selection of comments above reflects the overwhelming negative sentiment, and that&#8217;s from those people who bothered to stick around long enough to make their views known.</p>
<p>I would have thought Autodesk would have learned its lesson after the well-deserved thrashing it got the last time round, but apparently not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/06/30/autodesk-discussion-group-changes-user-reaction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Command line poll replaced</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/18/command-line-poll-replaced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/18/command-line-poll-replaced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Autodesk Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Butterfly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For the past couple of months, I have been running a poll about the command line. I ran it using wording copied directly from a Project Butterfly poll, to get some kind of comparison between the poll respondents on this blog and those on the Project Butterfly blog.</p> <p>It&#8217;s fair to say that I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the past couple of months, <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/02/26/can-you-work-without-a-command-line/">I have been running a poll</a> about the command line. I ran it using wording copied directly from a <a href="http://autodeskbutterfly.wordpress.com/2010/02/17/can-you-draw-without-the-command-line/">Project Butterfly poll</a>, to get some kind of comparison between the poll respondents on this blog and those on the <a href="http://autodeskbutterfly.wordpress.com/">Project Butterfly blog</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fair to say that I don&#8217;t like the wording of the available options, which appear designed to influence the result rather than find out what people really think. The &#8220;I can&#8217;t work with&#8230;&#8221; option has negative connotations; if I pick this choice, it implies that my abilities fall short in some way and I lack flexibility. On the other hand, the &#8220;I think it’s time for a new way&#8230;&#8221; option has a positive feel about it. If I pick this choice, I&#8217;m a thinker, I&#8217;m progressive, I&#8217;m looking to the future. It&#8217;s no accident that marketing people love to plaster &#8220;NEW!&#8221; over their products.</p>
<p>Despite the push-poll options, the command line was the clear winner on both blogs. Here are the <a href="http://autodeskbutterfly.wordpress.com/2010/02/25/new-poll-managing-files/">Project Butterfly results</a> (unknown number of voters):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I can’t work without the command line (66%)<br />
I think it’s time for a new way to draw without the command line (34%)</p>
<p>Here are <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/pollsarchive/">my results</a> (378 voters):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I can’t work without the command line (81.7%)<br />
I think it’s time for a new way to draw without the command line (18.3%)</p>
<p>I expected to see a greater preference for the command line among readers of this blog (largely command-line-using AutoCAD users) than among readers of the Project Butterfly blog (largely command-line-less <a href="http://butterfly.autodesk.com/">Project Butterfly</a> users). My expectation has been met. Instead of about a 2:1 majority there, command-line people here have about a 4.5:1 majority.</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s try a similar poll, hopefully without biased options, and see if that affects the result. I have replaced the above poll with this one:</p>
<p><strong>Should CAD software have a command line?</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes<br />
No</p>
<p>There are several ways in which this question could have been asked (do you prefer, is it more efficient, is it better, etc.), but the above appears to be the least biased I can come up with. Please have a look at this and other polls over on the right and vote if you feel so moved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/18/command-line-poll-replaced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ribbon poll roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/17/ribbon-poll-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/17/ribbon-poll-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 05:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Autodesk Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ribbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaan Hurley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Further to my last post, Here is a brief summary of this blog&#8217;s various poll results that relate in some way to Ribbon and CIP use. The most recent polls are at the top of the list. I have placed in bold those percentages that relate directly to the proportion of AutoCAD Ribbon use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to my <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/14/autodesks-cip-data-massively-biased/">last post</a>, Here is a brief summary of this blog&#8217;s various poll results that relate in some way to Ribbon and CIP use. The most recent polls are at the top of the list. I have placed in <strong>bold</strong> those percentages that relate directly to the proportion of AutoCAD Ribbon use among the voters on this blog.</p>
<ul>
<li>AutoCAD 2010 users&#8217;  Ribbon use: <strong>44%</strong> (AutoCAD 2010 users&#8217; CIP on: 36%)</li>
<li>Ribbon love: 28%</li>
<li>AutoCAD 2010 menu bar non-users: 23%</li>
<li>Inventor Ribbon use: 44% (Inventor 2010 users&#8217; Ribbon use: 59%)</li>
<li>Revit Ribbon use: 42% (Revit 2010 users&#8217; Ribbon use: 58%)</li>
<li>AutoCAD Ribbon use: <strong>32%</strong> (AutoCAD 2009/2010 users&#8217; Ribbon use: <strong>38%</strong>)</li>
<li>CIP on: 27%</li>
<li>AutoCAD 2009 menu bar non-users: 21%</li>
<li>AutoCAD 2009 Ribbon one of 3 best new features: 11%</li>
<li>AutoCAD 2009 Ribbon turned on in some way: <strong>29%</strong> (fully visible <strong>13%</strong>)</li>
</ul>
<p>The polls were run at different times over the past couple of years with different questions being asked in different ways about different releases, and responded to by very different numbers of voters. Don&#8217;t expect consistent or directly comparable results; this is not a scientific study. As with all polls here, there is a self-selection bias; those people who feel most strongly about a subject are more likely to find these polls and make the effort to vote in them.</p>
<p>The more recent polls generally have significantly greater sample size than the early ones. The smallest poll (AutoCAD 2009 best new features) has 37 voters, the largest poll (AutoCAD users generally using Ribbon) has 751. While the former certainly qualifies as <a href="http://autodesk.blogs.com/between_the_lines/2010/03/show-us-your-autocad-desktop.html">Shaan&#8217;s &#8220;a few dozen&#8221;</a>, the latter does only if you consider 62 to be &#8220;a few&#8221;. In which case, can I give you a thousand dollars and you give me a few hundred back?</p>
<p>Here are the poll details, which you can also see in the <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/pollsarchive/">Polls Archive</a>. If you think any of these questions or the available responses are in any way biased or leading , I&#8217;d be interested to hear your reasoning.</p>
<p><strong>AutoCAD 2010 users, what are your Ribbon and CIP settings?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 15 March 2010</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Ribbon on, CIP on <small>(24.7%, 65 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Ribbon on, CIP off <small>(19.4%, 51 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Ribbon off, CIP on <small>(11%, 29 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Ribbon off, CIP off <small>(44.9%, 118 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>Ribbon<br />
</strong>Start Date: 16 January 2010</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Love <small>(28.2%, 164 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Hate <small>(71.8%, 417 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>AutoCAD 2010 users: pull-down menus &#8211; is your menu bar turned on (MENUBAR=1)?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 14 September 2009</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes, it&#8217;s on all the time <small>(69.3%, 475 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes, it&#8217;s usually on but I sometimes turn it off <small>(4.1%, 28 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes in verticals, no in AutoCAD <small>(1.9%, 13 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes (other) <small>(1.5%, 10 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, it&#8217;s usually off but I sometimes turn it on <small>(7%, 48 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, I never use pull-downs <small>(13.7%, 94 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (other) <small>(2.5%, 17 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>Inventor users: are you generally using the Ribbon?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 11 September 2009</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes <small>(44.3%, 82 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using 2010) <small>(30.8%, 57 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using an earlier release to avoid the Ribbon) <small>(15.7%, 29 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using an earlier release for other reasons) <small>(9.2%, 17 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>Revit users: are you generally using the Ribbon?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 9 September 2009</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes <small>(41.6%, 153 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using 2010 in unsupported classic mode) <small>(30.2%, 111 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using an earlier release to avoid the Ribbon) <small>(20.4%, 75 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using an earlier release for other reasons) <small>(7.9%, 29 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>AutoCAD users: are you generally using the Ribbon?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 9 September 2009</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes <small>(32%, 240 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using 2009/10) <small>(51.1%, 384 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using an earlier release to avoid the Ribbon) <small>(11.7%, 88 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (using an earlier release for other reasons) <small>(5.2%, 39 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>Do you enable CIP (Customer Involvement Program) in your Autodesk products in production?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 23 February 2009</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes, always <small>(17.9%, 74 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes, on some products/releases <small>(8.9%, 37 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, because of privacy concerns <small>(30.4%, 126 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, because of performance concers <small>(19.3%, 80 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, it is not available for me <small>(3.4%, 14 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, other <small>(20%, 83 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>AutoCAD 2009 users: pull-down menus &#8211; is your menu bar turned on (MENUBAR=1)?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 28 November 2008</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes, it&#8217;s on all the time <small>(68.3%, 136 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes, it&#8217;s usually on but I sometimes turn it off <small>(6.5%, 13 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes in verticals, no in AutoCAD <small>(2.5%, 5 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Yes (other) <small>(2%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, it&#8217;s usually off but I sometimes turn it on <small>(2%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, I use the menu under the big red A <small>(6.5%, 13 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No, I never use pull-downs <small>(9.5%, 19 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No (other) <small>(2.5%, 5 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>Choose the best things about AutoCAD 2009 (up to 3)</strong><br />
Start Date: 11 July 2008</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Ribbon <small>(10.8%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Menu Browser <small>(5.4%, 2 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Quick Access Toolbar <small>(5.4%, 2 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Smaller floating toolbars <small>(8.1%, 3 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Status bar changes <small>(8.1%, 3 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Action Recorder <small>(18.9%, 7 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Modeless layer interface <small>(18.9%, 7 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Quick View Layouts/Drawings <small>(8.1%, 3 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Quick Properties <small>(13.5%, 5 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Spell checking in text editor <small>(29.7%, 11 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Rollover tooltips for objects <small>(13.5%, 5 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Enlarged tooltips for user interface <small>(0%, 0 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">ViewCube <small>(21.6%, 8 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Steering Wheel <small>(2.7%, 1 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">ShowMotion <small>(0%, 0 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Geographic Location <small>(2.7%, 1 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">DWFx <small>(5.4%, 2 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Off-white model space background <small>(0%, 0 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Drawing recovery changes <small>(8.1%, 3 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Updated button images <small>(2.7%, 1 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">LISP bug fixes <small>(13.5%, 5 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Scale List bug fixes <small>(10.8%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Other bug fixes <small>(10.8%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Improvements available only in vertical products <small>(16.2%, 6 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Other improvements in base AutoCAD <small>(8.1%, 3 Votes)</small></li>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AutoCAD 2009 non-Ribbon users: why don&#8217;t you use it?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 20 June 2008</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Uses up too much screen space <small>(63.6%, 35 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Doesn&#8217;t make good use of my screen size/shape <small>(45.5%, 25 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Using it minimised requires an extra click/hover <small>(47.3%, 26 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Tab concept means extra clicks <small>(65.5%, 36 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Dislike concept of hiding tools &#8211; want buttons to stay visible <small>(60%, 33 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Tab switching is too slow <small>(45.5%, 25 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Button click reaction is too slow <small>(38.2%, 21 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Turning it off saves startup time <small>(30.9%, 17 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Ribbon content doesn&#8217;t match my needs <small>(43.6%, 24 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">All the commands should be on it <small>(27.3%, 15 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Express Tools are missing <small>(32.7%, 18 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Other things I use frequently are missing <small>(40%, 22 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Too hard to find things <small>(50.9%, 28 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">No advantage over existing methods <small>(63.6%, 35 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Customising it is too difficult <small>(43.6%, 24 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Don&#8217;t like the colour scheme <small>(16.4%, 9 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Don&#8217;t like fuzzy text (ClearType) <small>(25.5%, 14 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Using a vertical product that doesn&#8217;t make use of the Ribbon <small>(23.6%, 13 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Want to avoid training expense/inconvenience <small>(18.2%, 10 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Want to avoid initial productivity reduction <small>(18.2%, 10 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Inconsistent with other programs we use (e.g. Office pre-2007) <small>(12.7%, 7 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Opposition to Microsoft&#8217;s influence <small>(23.6%, 13 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">I&#8217;m a Luddite and resist change for the sake of it <small>(7.3%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<p><strong>AutoCAD 2009 users: in what state do you usually have your Ribbon?<br />
</strong>Start Date: 28 May 2008</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Horizontal and fully visible <small>(10.4%, 8 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Horizontal and minimised to panel titles <small>(5.2%, 4 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Horizontal and minimised to tabs <small>(7.8%, 6 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Vertical, floating and fully visible <small>(1.3%, 1 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Vertical, floating and auto-hiding <small>(0%, 0 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Vertical, docked and fully visible <small>(1.3%, 1 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Vertical, docked and auto-hiding (Anchor left or right) <small>(2.6%, 2 Votes)</small></li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Turned off <small>(71.4%, 55 Votes)</small></li>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/17/ribbon-poll-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Autodesk&#8217;s CIP data &#8211; massively biased?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/14/autodesks-cip-data-massively-biased/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/14/autodesks-cip-data-massively-biased/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deelip Menezes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ribbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaan Hurley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teresa Anania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=1024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You may have seen Shaan Hurley and I having a discussion (ahem) over the validity of his statement:</p> <p>I really do use the ribbon now with AutoCAD 2010 along with most users as evidenced by the CIP data we receive daily from thousands of AutoCAD users who choose to send the great data.</p> <p>So, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have seen Shaan Hurley and I having <a href="http://autodesk.blogs.com/between_the_lines/2010/03/show-us-your-autocad-desktop.html">a discussion</a> (ahem) over the validity of his statement:</p>
<blockquote><p>I really do use the ribbon now with AutoCAD 2010 <em>along with most users</em> as evidenced by the CIP data we receive daily from thousands of AutoCAD users who choose to send the great data.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, now you know. Most of you use the Ribbon now,  Shaan said so. Shaan, as he always has done in the past, declined my invitation to back up this assertion with more details. He has vast amounts of data collected from huge numbers of users. How could that possibly be wrong?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how. CIP data is biased.</p>
<p>How can millions of data points be biased? Actually, all samples are biased. Only the degree of bias varies. The polls on this blog are no exception. I do my best to keep the questions and options neutral; the only leading questions you&#8217;ll see here in serious polls are <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/02/26/can-you-work-without-a-command-line/">the ones I copy and paste from Autodesk blogs</a>. But readers of this blog are one self-selecting small portion of Autodesk customers, and people who vote in my polls represent another self-selecting portion of that portion.</p>
<p>The question is, how biased is Autodesk&#8217;s CIP data? Without access to Autodesk&#8217;s data (which it won&#8217;t provide) and resources for alternative data collection from its customers (ditto), the best I can do is use my own biased sample (that&#8217;s you lot out there) as a cross-check.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s examine it in light of Ribbon use among AutoCAD 2010 users. In an <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/06/25/autocad-2009-how-many-people-really-are-using-the-ribbon/">earlier comparison</a> of my 2009 poll figures and Shaan&#8217;s CIP data, I wrote this:</p>
<blockquote><p>But Shaan’s CIP users are also a biased sample, comprising those AutoCAD users who have CIP turned on. Are users who go with the flow and have CIP on also more likely to go with the flow and leave the Ribbon on? Possibly, but I would have thought the CIP-on bias would be less significant than the blog-reader bias.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have recently run a poll to try to determine if that &#8220;possibly&#8221;, that hunch, has any basis. Let&#8217;s examine the results I got.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AutoCAD 2010 users, what are your Ribbon and CIP settings?</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Ribbon on, CIP on (24.7%, 65 Votes)<br />
Ribbon on, CIP off (19.4%, 51 Votes)<br />
Ribbon off, CIP on (11%, 29 Votes)<br />
Ribbon off, CIP off (44.9%, 118 Votes)</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Total Voters: 263</p>
<p>For the sake of argument, let&#8217;s make the assumption that my poll sample is unbiased. It&#8217;s not, and the degree of bias is unknown, but let&#8217;s see what it would mean if it was. Let&#8217;s see what kind of results Autodesk would see from its CIP sample:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>CIP-on voters (94):</strong><br />
Ribbon on 69% (65)<br />
Ribbon off 31% (29)</p>
<p>Shaan would see from this result that 69% of AutoCAD 2010 users have the Ribbon on, and would be tempted to say stuff like &#8220;use the ribbon now with AutoCAD 2010 along with <em>most</em> users&#8221;. Understandable. That&#8217;s just CIP users, but non-CIP users can&#8217;t be that different, surely? Or can they?</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>CIP-off voters (169):</strong><br />
Ribbon on 30% (51)<br />
Ribbon off 70% (118)</p>
<p>Wow. That&#8217;s a <em>huge</em> discrepancy, and it implies that a sample selection based on CIP use introduces a <em>massive</em> bias. I&#8217;ve watched this poll grow over the weeks, half-expecting things to even out as the sample size increased. It didn&#8217;t. It has been pretty constant, with non-Ribbon non-CIP users outnumbering Ribbonite non-CIP users by a substantial margin.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s put the groups together, shall we?</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>All voters (263)</strong><br />
Ribbon on 44% (116)<br />
Ribbon off 56% (147)</p>
<p>So, if the voters in my poll were observed by Autodesk via CIP they would appear to be 69% Ribbon users. In fact, only 44% of these voters are Ribbon users.</p>
<p>How many AutoCAD 2010 users <em>really</em> have the Ribbon on? 69%? 30%? 44%? Some other number? I don&#8217;t know, and that&#8217;s not the point. The point is, Autodesk doesn&#8217;t know either. It can take some smart guesses, but just assuming CIP is accurate isn&#8217;t smart, it&#8217;s just a guess.</p>
<p>Why does this matter? Because Autodesk makes decisions based on this stuff. Decisions that affect you and me and how we use our tools. Have a look at this statement from Autodesk&#8217;s Teresa Anania, Director of Industry Management (taken from <a href="http://www.deelip.com/?p=2120">her interview with Deelip Menezes</a> about Inventor):</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;we had data that suggested that the new ribbon UI was well received and would be absolutely all that customers needed &#8230;. And now since we have the CIP data that shows us how our customers are using the software, we can analyze this before we permanently turn anything off.</p></blockquote>
<p>Comments like this (and others from other Adeskers) seem to indicate that there is an unspoken assumption that CIP users accurately represent a true cross-section of users in general.</p>
<p>I know that Autodesk doesn&#8217;t rely solely on CIP; it uses a wide range of research tools to find out what users are up to and what they need. I regularly encourage you to participate in various Autodesk surveys, for example. But there are problems of accuracy inherent in all those methods. It would be natural, when faced with a set of apparently conflicting results from different sources, for Autodesk decision-makers to simply assume that the source with the biggest sample size is the most accurate. That could be a dangerous mistake, for both Autodesk and its customers.</p>
<p><em>Note: my arithmetic was off in several places when I posted this, and I have edited the post to correct some of the figures. These corrections do not invalidate the arguments; the substantial bias is still evident.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/14/autodesks-cip-data-massively-biased/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How is your AutoCAD 2011 hatching?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/05/how-is-your-autocad-2011-hatching/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/05/how-is-your-autocad-2011-hatching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 05:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ribbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hatching is the poster child for AutoCAD 2011&#8242;s 2D drafting feature changes (although there are several other significant ones), and also for demonstrating the advantages of providing a contextual interface via the Ribbon. It looks great at first glance when working with simple demo drawings, but how are things going in the real world? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hatching is the poster child for AutoCAD 2011&#8242;s 2D drafting feature changes (although there are several other significant ones), and also for demonstrating the advantages of providing a contextual interface via the Ribbon. It looks great at first glance when working with simple demo drawings, but how are things going in the real world? I&#8217;d be interested in hearing about your experiences.</p>
<ul>
<li>Is the hatch Ribbon tab snapping into place and going away quickly enough, both the first time it is used in a session and subsequently?</li>
<li>Is the Ribbon interface easy to use, efficient and complete?</li>
<li>Does the hatch preview always match what&#8217;s actually hatched when you accept the preview? If not, how often is it wrong?</li>
<li>Are you happy with the new default double-click hatch action? (If not, see the <strong>Hatch double-click</strong> section of my <a title="Article about: AutoCAD 2011 – Putting things back to “normal”" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/25/autocad-2011-putting-things-back-to-normal/">AutoCAD 2011 – Putting things back to “normal”</a> post).</li>
<li>Does the hatch preview work quickly and accurately in simple areas? How about more complex areas? How about areas bounded by complex polylines with lots of vertices?</li>
<li>Is the performance up to scratch when creating and editing both associative and non-associative hatches? How about when grips are visible on complex bounding areas? How about when you make changes to hatches using the Properties palette?</li>
<li>Is boundary detection working reliably in finding and filling a closed hatch area? Even when using a solid or gradient hatch pattern?</li>
<li>How is your zoom and pan performance in drawings with a lot of hatching?</li>
<li>Have you noticed any problems with the new transparency and background features?</li>
<li>Have you experienced any hatch-induced crashes or lockups?</li>
<li>Are any of your hatch problems new to 2011, or do they also exist in earlier releases on the same PC when using the same drawings?</li>
</ul>
<p>If your hatching performance is poor, have you tried changing the values of system variables to turn off features to see if the problems persist? Try HPQUICKPREVIEW = 0, HPDLGMODE = 1 and SELECTIONPREVIEW = 0. Also, if you are having display performance issues, try VTENABLE =0 and check using 3DCONFIG to see if your graphics card/driver combination is certified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/05/how-is-your-autocad-2011-hatching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do I think of the Ribbon?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/04/19/what-do-i-think-of-the-ribbon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/04/19/what-do-i-think-of-the-ribbon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navel Gazing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ribbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious. What do you think I think about the Ribbon, particularly in AutoCAD? Do you think I&#8217;m a hater, a lover, indifferent, or what? Now, on what evidence do you base that view? Feel free to quote back to me anything I&#8217;ve written on this blog or any other public place to support [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious. What do you think I think about the Ribbon, particularly in AutoCAD? Do you think I&#8217;m a hater, a lover, indifferent, or what? Now, on what evidence do you base that view? Feel free to quote back to me anything I&#8217;ve written on this blog or any other public place to support your opinion. If you can&#8217;t find anything that gives you any clues one way or the other, feel free to mention that, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/04/19/what-do-i-think-of-the-ribbon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD Classic Interface Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/04/06/autocad-classic-interface-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/04/06/autocad-classic-interface-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Twitter throws up a gem every now and then. I just saw this in a retweet by Melanie Perry of a tweet from Autodesk&#8217;s Elena Fadeeva:</p> <p>AutoCAD Toolbars and Menus Survey</p> <p>I strongly encourage you to participate in this survey. </p> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter throws up a gem every now and then. I just saw this in a retweet by <a href="http://twitter.com/MistresDorkness">Melanie Perry</a> of a tweet from Autodesk&#8217;s <a href="http://twitter.com/ELENAofRUSSIA">Elena Fadeeva</a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/Toolbars">AutoCAD Toolbars and Menus Survey</a></p>
<p>I strongly encourage you to participate in this survey. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/04/06/autocad-classic-interface-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2011&#8242;s new Help system &#8211; what do you think?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/28/autocad-2011s-new-help-system-what-do-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/28/autocad-2011s-new-help-system-what-do-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 01:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With all this talk of clouds in the air, it is interesting to note that Autodesk has moved AutoCAD&#8217;s Help system to a browser-based format, with online access as the default. So, how has Autodesk done with this first dipping of its toes into the cloudy waters with its primary mainstream product? I&#8217;ve already [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all this talk of clouds in the air, it is interesting to note that Autodesk has moved AutoCAD&#8217;s Help system to a browser-based format, with online access as the default. So, how has Autodesk done with this first dipping of its toes into the cloudy waters with its primary mainstream product? I&#8217;ve already had a couple of unsolicited comments on the subject, and I&#8217;d like to hear from you. How do you rate the following, compared with previous releases?</p>
<ul>
<li>Performance (online)</li>
<li>Performance (offline)</li>
<li>Search results</li>
<li>Content completeness and accuracy</li>
<li>Ease of manual browsing</li>
<li>Efficiency of user interface</li>
<li>Concept of online Help</li>
<li>Anything else you want to mention</li>
</ul>
<p>Please comment to express your views and use the poll on the right to provide an overall rating of the new system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/28/autocad-2011s-new-help-system-what-do-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2011 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/25/autocad-2011-putting-things-back-to-normal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/25/autocad-2011-putting-things-back-to-normal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Easily the most popular post on this blog, in terms of both hits and comments, is AutoCAD 2009 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;. Not too far behind it is AutoCAD 2010 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;. Apparently, lots of people find these posts useful, so here&#8217;s an updated version for the latest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easily the most popular post on this blog, in terms of both hits and comments, is <a href="/2008/03/27/autocad-2009-putting-things-back-to-normal/">AutoCAD 2009 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;</a>. Not too far behind it is <a href="/2009/06/16/autocad-2010-putting-things-back-to-normal/">AutoCAD 2010 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;</a>. Apparently, lots of people find these posts useful, so here&#8217;s an updated version for the latest release. Some of this post is based on the originals, but there are significant additions and differences in this year&#8217;s Luddite post.</p>
<p>Note: there is an updated version of this post for AutoCAD <a href="/2011/04/14/autocad-2012-putting-things-back-to-normal">2012</a>.</p>
<p>One thing that&#8217;s regularly asked whenever a new AutoCAD release hits the streets is how to make it work like earlier releases. As I stated in my original post, I think you should give any new features a fighting chance before turning them off or ignoring them. But it&#8217;s entirely your choice. We should be grateful that in AutoCAD 2011 at least (unlike some Autodesk products), you do still have that choice.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume you&#8217;ve made the decision to put your environment back to AutoCAD 2008 or earlier; how do you do it?</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Workspace</strong>. In vanilla AutoCAD, you can restore much of the user interface by just switching workspaces. The main Workspace control is now located near the top right corner. If you have turned this off (right-click, <em>Remove from Quick Access Toolbar</em>) or if you just prefer working with interface elements in the same place year by year, there is another Workspace control in the bottom right corner. This is a little button that looks like a gearwheel. Every odd-numbered release seems to have the current workspace name missing from this button, so this year we miss out. If you want the name, this year you need to look in the QAT. In either case, click on the Workspace control and pick the item called <em>AutoCAD Classic</em>. This will perform some of the steps described below, but not all of them, so I suggest you read on. If you&#8217;re using a vertical variant of AutoCAD 2011, this workspace may not be available, so you&#8217;ll need to make your own by manually setting up your interface the way you like it, then saving it as a Workspace using the <em>Save Current As&#8230;</em> option under one of the Workspace controls.</li>
<li><strong>Ribbon</strong>. You can close the Ribbon with the RibbonClose command. If you ever want to turn it back on, enter Ribbon.</li>
<li><strong>Dashboard</strong>. The AutoCAD 2007/8 Dashboard is gone, but you can have a vertical Ribbon instead. If the Ribbon is not visible (it won&#8217;t be if you just selected the <em>AutoCAD Classic</em> workspace), enter Riboon to bring it back. In the tab title row (the bar with the word <em>Home</em> in it), right-click and pick <em>Undock</em>. Now you can place and size your Dashboard-like thing as you see fit. As before, you can right-click on things to change the various settings. However, getting the contents exactly the way you want it usually involves using CUI, and that&#8217;s well outside the scope of this post.</li>
<li><strong>NavBar</strong>. If you like the new NavBar feature as much as I do, you&#8217;ll want to turn it off. You can close it easily using the little X in its top left corner. Alternatively, control it with the NAVBARDISPLAY system variable (0 for off, 1 for on)</li>
<li><strong>ViewCube</strong>. I like the ViewCube concept, and I think it&#8217;s a great piece of interface design. But not everybody agrees. It has caused performance issues and it&#8217;s not very useful for 2D users. If you want it gone, that&#8217;s a surprisingly difficult thing to find out about. It&#8217;s controlled using the Options command, in the 3D Modeling tab, in the bottom left corner. Turn off those toggles that don&#8217;t make sense for you. There is a related set of system variables called NAVVCUBExxx.</li>
<li><strong>UCS Icon</strong>. Don&#8217;t like the new simplified UCS icon? Sorry! While you can use the UCSIcon command&#8217;s Properties option to change the appearance of the icon in various ways, there&#8217;s nothing to restore the UCS Icon&#8217;s appearance from previous releases with its little arrows pointing the way. This information isn&#8217;t totally useless, because at least it will save you the time and effort involved in finding this out for yourself.</li>
<li><strong>Help</strong>. Unless you want your Help to work with the speed of a long-dead slug that has been nailed to a hefty piece of wood, you will want to turn off AutoCAD 2011&#8242;s online help. Go into Options again, this time in the System tab, then look in the bottom right pane to turn off the <em>Use online help</em> toggle. Even with online help turned off, you&#8217;re stuck with the unfortunate new browser-based Help interface. While you&#8217;re looking there, you may also wish to turn off AutoCAD&#8217;s insistence on firing up Internet Explorer, that is if you dislike IE or have security concerns.</li>
<li><strong>Pull-down Menus</strong>. Enter MENUBAR 1 to turn pull-down menus on. To turn them off again, enter MENUBAR 0.</li>
<li><strong>Toolbars</strong>. In AutoCAD 2009, you could turn individual toolbars on and off by accessing a menu obtained by right-clicking on the QAT. Autodesk rather nastily removed that option in 2010, and it&#8217;s still gone in 2011. That menu is still available if you right-click in an unused docked toolbar area, but if you have no toolbars visible there will be no such area available. What to do? Turn on one toolbar at the Command prompt, then you will be able to access the menu by right-clicking on the blank area to the right of it. The following command sequence will do it:<br />
<code>_.-TOOLBAR ACAD.Standard _Top 0,0</code><br />
Paste this into AutoCAD&#8217;s command line area and the Standard toolbar will be turned on above your drawing area. This will leave a grey area to the right that you can right-click into. The other toolbars will be in sub-menus under that, with the main set of default ones in the AutoCAD section. Note that this will only work if you have the acad.cuix file loaded (or partially loaded). This is the case in vanilla AutoCAD and some verticals, but it may not be the case in other verticals. As I don&#8217;t have access to such verticals, I&#8217;m afraid I can&#8217;t offer much advice here.</li>
<li><strong>Graphic Background</strong>. Autodesk has half-listened to users&#8217; pleas for a black background by giving you a nearly black one (RGB 33,40,48 rather than 0,0,0), in model space only. Many of you will want a real black background to provide better contrast. To do this, invoke the Options command (right-click on the drawing area and pick <em>Options&#8230;</em> or just enter OP), then pick the <em>Display</em> tab. Don&#8217;t be tempted to choose <em>Color Scheme</em> and set it to <em>Dark</em>, because that just changes the appearance of various user interface elements. Instead, pick the <em>Colors&#8230;</em> button. This will put you in the Drawing Window Colors dialogue box. On the left, choose a context you want to change (e.g. <em>2D model space</em>), choose the appropriate background element (e.g. <em>Uniform background</em>) and choose the particular shade that takes your fancy. There is a <em>Restore Classic Colors</em> button, but that only takes you back to AutoCAD 2008 with its black model and white paper space. If you want a black paper space background too, you&#8217;ll have to pick the <em>Sheet / layout</em> context and specify that individually. When you&#8217;re done, pick <em>Apply &amp; Close</em>, then <em>OK</em>.</li>
<li><strong>Crosshairs</strong>. Want 100% crosshairs? Many people do. As before, use the Options command&#8217;s Display tab and look towards the bottom right, or use the CURSORSIZE system variable.</li>
<li><strong>Status bar</strong>. Right-click on a status bar button, turn off <em>Use Icons</em> and your old text-based status bar buttons will return. If you have no use for some of the new status bar toggles, right-click on one, pick <em>Display</em>, then turn off what you don&#8217;t need.</li>
<li><strong>Grid</strong>. I much prefer the new line-based grid. If you don&#8217;t, right-click on the Grid status button and pick Settings&#8230;, which will take you into the Drafting Settings dialogue box, which you can also get at with the DSettings command, or DS for short. In the Snap and Grid tab, the grid is controlled by the options on the right. If you want your dots back, turn on the toggles in the <em>Grid style</em> section. This can also be done using the GRIDSTYLE system variable. If you don&#8217;t like the fact that the grid is now on by default in new drawings, this is set on a drawing-by-drawing basis and is therefore controlled by your template drawings. If you use AutoCAD&#8217;s supplied templates, you will need to open them individually and turn off the grid in each one.</li>
<li><strong>Dynamic Input</strong>. If Dynamic Input slows you down, you can turn it off with the status bar toggle or F12. If you like the general idea but don&#8217;t like some parts of it, there are lots of options available in the <em>Dynamic Input</em> tab of the DSettings command to enable you to control it to a fine degree. You can also get at this by right-clicking the Dynamic Input status bar button and picking <em>Settings&#8230;</em> As an example of the sort of thing you might do in there, the default of using relative coordinates is difficult for long-termers to get used to. To turn it off, pick the <em>Settings&#8230;</em> button in the <em>Pointer Input</em> panel, pick <em>Absolute coordinates</em>, then OK twice. There are a whole range of DYNxxx system variables for controlling this stuff.</li>
<li><strong>Xref fading</strong>. Don&#8217;t like your xrefs looking different? Use the Options command&#8217;s <em>Display</em> tab and look at the Xref display slider on the bottom right, or use the XDWGFADECTL system variable.</li>
<li><strong>Selection</strong>. Selection Preview annoys some users, adding as it does an unfortunate degree of stickiness and working inaccurately when Snap is in use. This is controlled in the <em>Selection</em> tab of the Options command. Turn off the toggles in the <em>Selection preview</em> panel on the left (these control the SELECTIONPREVIEW system variable). If you dislike the coloured boxes you get while doing a Window or Crossing, pick the <em>Visual Effect Settings&#8230;</em> button and turn off the <em>Indicate selection area</em> toggle. This controls the SELECTIONAREA system variable.</li>
<li><strong>Hatch dialog box.</strong> If you want the Ribbon on but prefer the old Hatch dialog box, set HPDLGMODE to 1.</li>
<li><strong>Hatch double-click</strong>. If you&#8217;re not using the new Ribbon-based hatch editing feature, you will probably want to invoke the HatchEdit command when you double-click on a hatch object. Doing this involves braving the CUI interface, but I have gone into <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/05/10/restoring-hatch-double-click-in-autocad-2011/">step-by-step detail of that process here</a>. In short, you need to drag and drop the Hatch Edit command from the bottom left CUI panel onto the double-click action for Hatch in the top left panel, replacing the default action (Properties).</li>
<li><strong>Classic commands</strong>. If you prefer not to leave the various new palettes on screen all the time, old versions of various commands are still available: ClassicLayer, ClassicXref and ClassicImage. (Autodesk has deprecated these commands in 2011, which I think is a really bad idea). There is also a system variable LAYERDLGMODE, which when set to 0 will make the Layer command work in the old (and faster) modal way. If you use this setting, you can still access the new modeless layer palette with the LayerPalette command. Going back further, there are command-line methods of using these commands: -Layer, -Xref, XAttach, -Image and ImageAttach.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you have allowed AutoCAD to migrate your settings (I never do), some of the above will already be done for you, but by no means all of it. If past experience is anything to go by, the job done by Migration will probably be imperfect.</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;re happy with your new environment, I suggest you save your workspace under a name of your choosing (Save Current As&#8230; under a Workspace control), then export your profile in the Options command&#8217;s Profiles tab. Keep a safe copy of both your exported profile and your main CUIX file (acad.cuix by default), because that is where new workspaces are stored.</p>
<p>Let me just end by saying that Autodesk generally does an excellent job of keeping long-term AutoCAD users happy by allowing them to keep working in the way that they prefer. There are exceptions, but conservative users are much better off with new releases of AutoCAD than they are with, say, Microsoft Word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/25/autocad-2011-putting-things-back-to-normal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Send your screen to Autodesk</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/08/send-your-screen-to-autodesk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/08/send-your-screen-to-autodesk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guillermo Melantoni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No, I don&#8217;t mean Autodesk is now so impoverished that it is running short of monitors for its staff, I mean send a capture of your screen to Autodesk. Guillermo Melantoni, one of AutoCAD’s Product Managers, would like to see how you arrange your user interface for production use. As I&#8217;ve mentioned before, Guillermo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I don&#8217;t mean Autodesk is now so impoverished that it is running short of monitors for its staff, I mean send a <em>capture</em> of your screen to Autodesk. <a href="http://whatamesh.typepad.com/">Guillermo Melantoni</a>, one of AutoCAD’s Product Managers, would like to see how you arrange your user interface for production use. As I&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/04/16/guillermo-melantonis-3d-blog/">mentioned before</a>, Guillermo is a very smart guy who is responsible for recent 3D enhancements to AutoCAD. He is open to listening to customers and trying to accommodate their needs. Here&#8217;s what he has to say:</p>
<blockquote><p>I would like to ask all of you to send me screen capture of your AutoCAD in production. I’d like to understand how you organize the diverse components, how you use the Ribbon and/or the toolbars, if you display the command line or not, if you use tool palettes.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m very happy Guillermo is seeking to gain a fuller understanding of the diverse ways in which we use AutoCAD, and I encourage you to send him a screen capture of your working environment. If you have several workspaces, send him several screen captures explaining what each capture is showing and how often it is used. If you are a CAD manager or other person with access to several users who set up their interfaces differently, then please send in examples from those other users too.</p>
<p>There are many ways of creating screen captures, but the good old Print Scrn button should do the job fine here, capturing both screens if you use a dual-monitor setup. You can then fire up any graphics app such as Paint (e.g. in XP, Start &gt; Run &gt; mspaint [Enter]) and paste in your capture. Please don&#8217;t save it as a BMP file even if that&#8217;s the default, as that&#8217;s extremely space-inefficient. The PNG format works well for screen captures, being compact without losing quality.</p>
<p>Please send your captures by email to <a href="mailto:guillermo.melantoni@autodesk.com?subject=MyUI">guillermo.melantoni@autodesk.com</a>, and use a subject that begins with <strong>MyUI</strong>, to help Guillermo deal with what I hope is a lot of screen capture emails!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2010/03/08/send-your-screen-to-autodesk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>These messages are brought to you by AutoCAD</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/08/31/these-messages-are-brought-to-you-by-autocad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/08/31/these-messages-are-brought-to-you-by-autocad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Messages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few releases, and particularly in AutoCAD 2009 and 2010, I have noticed an increase in the number of information notices (bubbles, warnings, task dialogs, Communication Center notices, etc.) being displayed. Shaan Hurley has pointed out that 2010 Update 1 introduces a balloon notification that periodically makes you aware of how much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few releases, and particularly in AutoCAD 2009 and 2010, I have noticed an increase in the number of information notices (bubbles, warnings, task dialogs, Communication Center notices, etc.) being displayed. Shaan Hurley <a href="http://autodesk.blogs.com/between_the_lines/2009/08/autocad-2010-and-autocad-lt-2010-update-1-sp1-available-for-download.html">has pointed out</a> that 2010 Update 1 introduces a balloon notification that periodically makes you aware of how much time remains before your subscription expires. Is this a good thing?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a poll on the right that asks a specific question about the default state of AutoCAD 2009 and 2010, but I&#8217;d also like to see some comments on this. What do you think of these messages? Are they useful? Do they get in the way? Do you take any notice of them? Are there too many? Do we need any others? Do you turn them off? Is it easy enough to control them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/08/31/these-messages-are-brought-to-you-by-autocad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2010 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/06/16/autocad-2010-putting-things-back-to-normal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/06/16/autocad-2010-putting-things-back-to-normal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Autodesk Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Easily the most popular post on this blog, in terms of both hits and comments, is AutoCAD 2009 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;. Lots of people seemed to find it useful, so I guess it&#8217;s worth doing an updated sequel for the current release. Much of this post is the same as the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easily the most popular post on this blog, in terms of both hits and comments, is <a href="/2008/03/27/autocad-2009-putting-things-back-to-normal/">AutoCAD 2009 &#8211; Putting things back to &#8220;normal&#8221;</a>. Lots of people seemed to find it useful, so I guess it&#8217;s worth doing an updated sequel for the current release. Much of this post is the same as the original, but there are differences.</p>
<p>Note: there are updated versions of this post for AutoCAD <a href="/2010/03/25/autocad-2011-putting-things-back-to-normal/">2011</a> and <a href="/2011/04/14/autocad-2012-putting-things-back-to-normal">2012</a>.</p>
<p>One thing that&#8217;s regularly asked whenever a new AutoCAD release hits the streets is how to make it work like earlier releases. As I stated in my original post, I think you should give any new features a fighting chance before turning them off or ignoring them. The 2010 Ribbon is still a Ribbon, but in my view it&#8217;s a better one than in 2009. But it&#8217;s entirely your choice. We should be grateful that in AutoCAD 2010 at least (unlike Revit 2010), you do still have that choice.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume you&#8217;ve made the decision to put your environment back to AutoCAD 2008 or earlier; how do you do it?</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Workspace</strong>. In vanilla AutoCAD, you can restore much of the user interface by just switching workspaces. In the bottom right corner, there is a little button that looks like a gearwheel. This is the Workspace control. Click on it and pick the item called <em>AutoCAD Classic</em>. If you&#8217;re using a vertical variant of AutoCAD 2010, this workspace may not be available. If so, or if you want finer control over your interface, read on.</li>
<li><strong>Pull-down Menus</strong>. Enter MENUBAR 1 to turn pull-down menus on. To turn them off again, enter MENUBAR 0.</li>
<li><strong>Toolbars</strong>. In AutoCAD 2009, you could turn individual toolbars on and off by accessing a menu obtained by right-clicking on the QAT. Autodesk (vindictively?) removed that option in 2010. That menu is still available if you right-click in an unused docked toolbar area, but if you have no toolbars visible there will be no such area available. What to do? Turn on one toolbar at the Command prompt, then you will be able to access the menu by right-clicking on the blank area to the right of it. The following command sequence will do it:
<p>_.-TOOLBAR ACAD.Standard _Top 0,0</p>
<p>Note that this will only work if you have the acad.cuix file loaded (or partially loaded). This is the case in vanilla AutoCAD and some verticals (e.g. AutoCAD Civil 3D), but it may not be the case in other verticals (e.g. AutoCAD Architecture).
</li>
<li><strong>Ribbon</strong>. You can close the Ribbon with the RibbonClose command. If you ever want to turn it back on, enter Ribbon.</li>
<li><strong>Dashboard</strong>. The AutoCAD 2007/8 Dashboard is gone, but you can have a vertical Ribbon instead. If the Ribbon is not visible (it won&#8217;t be if you just selected the <em>AutoCAD Classic</em> workspace), enter Riboon to bring it back. In the tab title row (the bar with the word <em>Home</em> in it), right-click and pick <em>Undock</em>. Now you can place and size your Dashboard-like thing as you see fit. As before, you can right-click on things to change the various settings. However, getting the contents exactly the way you want it usually involves using CUI, and that&#8217;s well outside the scope of this post.</li>
<li><strong>Graphic Background</strong>. Despite Autodesk thinking it&#8217;s a good idea to hide all the yellow lines in your drawings by giving you a creamy drawing area, many of you will want a black background. To do this, right-click on the drawing area and pick <em>Options&#8230;</em> (or just enter OP), then pick the <em>Display</em> tab. Don&#8217;t be tempted to choose <em>Color Scheme</em> and set it to <em>Dark</em>, because that just changes the appearance of various user interface elements. Instead, pick the <em>Colors&#8230;</em> button. On the left, choose a context you want to change (e.g. <em>2D model space</em>), choose the appropriate background element (e.g. <em>Uniform background</em>) and choose the particular shade that takes your fancy. There is a <em>Restore Classic Colors</em> button, but that only takes you back to AutoCAD 2008 with its white paper space. If you want a black paper space, you&#8217;ll have to specify that individually. When you&#8217;re done, pick <em>Apply &amp; Close</em>, then <em>OK</em>.</li>
<li><strong>Status bar</strong>. Right-click on a status bar button, turn off <em>Use Icons</em> and your text-based status bar buttons will return.</li>
<li><strong>Classic commands</strong>. If you prefer not to leave the various new palettes on screen all the time, old versions of various commands are still available: ClassicLayer, ClassicXref and ClassicImage. There is also a system variable LAYERDLGMODE, which when set to 0 will make the Layer command work in the old and faster modal way. If you use this setting, you can still access the new modeless layer palette with the LayerPalette command. Going back further, there are command-line methods of these commands: -Layer, -Xref, XAttach, -Image and ImageAttach.</li>
</ul>
<p>If you have allowed AutoCAD to migrate your settings (I never do), some of the above will already be done for you, but by no means all of it. Once you&#8217;re happy with your new environment, I suggest you save your workspace under a name of your choosing (Save Current As&#8230; under the gearwheel button), then export your profile in the Options command&#8217;s Profiles tab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/06/16/autocad-2010-putting-things-back-to-normal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revolt of the Revit Ribbon Renegades</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/11/revolt-of-the-revit-ribbon-renegades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/11/revolt-of-the-revit-ribbon-renegades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 07:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Autodesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Autodesk Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUGI Forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revit 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I hesitate to cover this subject because my understanding of Revit is very close to nil. I&#8217;m going to cover it anyway, because it relates to the Does Autodesk Listen? theme that I&#8217;ve discussed here in the past.</p> <p>Revit 2010 has appeared with a Ribbon interface, and many users don&#8217;t like it. Some well-known [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hesitate to cover this subject because my understanding of <a href="http://www.autodesk.com/revit">Revit</a> is very close to nil. I&#8217;m going to cover it anyway, because it relates to the <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?s=listening">Does Autodesk Listen?</a> theme that I&#8217;ve discussed here in the past.</p>
<p>Revit 2010 has appeared with a Ribbon interface, and many users don&#8217;t like it. Some well-known Revit users, including bloggers, former Autodesk employees and Revit founders, have railed against the new release. Autodesk has been accused of ignoring long-standing wishlists and pre-release feedback. Autodesk has (it is said) wasted precious development resources by introducing a badly-designed and poorly-performing pretty new face at the expense of solving long-standing and much-requested improvements to the core product. The main complaint appears to be that Autodesk didn&#8217;t do much with this release, other than introducing an interface that doesn&#8217;t work as well as the one it replaced.</p>
<p>All this will sound very familiar to AutoCAD users, but there are some significant differences between the AutoCAD 2009 situation and the Revit 2010 one. First, I think it&#8217;s fair to say (even based on my limited knowledge) that the old Revit interface <em>was</em> in some need of attention. It was basically an <a href="http://www.revitzone.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=377&#038;Itemid=41">old NT-style interface</a> that had been left neglected for some years. Revit users may have been mostly happy with the way the interface <em>worked</em>, but the way it <em>looked</em> must have been a bit embarrasing, especially for Autodesk. Second, AutoCAD 2009 left the old interface in place for those people who wanted or needed to use it; with Revit 2010 it&#8217;s Ribbon or nothing. There is no transition strategy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not qualified to make a judgement on whether the complaints about the usability of the new interface are justified. I should also mention that not every Revit user hates everything about Revit 2010, and there are positive comments from some about the new interface. However, I can say that the anti-Ribbon arguments have been expressed not only passionately, but also intelligently and persuasively. It&#8217;s not so much a matter of &#8220;change is bad&#8221;, but more &#8220;<em>this</em> change is bad, and here&#8217;s why&#8221;. Here are some examples:</p>
<p><a href="http://architechure.blogspot.com/2009/03/one-more-thing.html">One More Thing&#8230;</a><br />
<a href="http://architechure.blogspot.com/2009/03/one-more-one-more-thing.html">One More One More Thing&#8230;</a><br />
<a href="http://architechure.blogspot.com/2009/03/well-intentioned-road-paving.html">A Well-Intentioned Road Paving</a><br />
<a href="http://architechure.blogspot.com/2009/03/dont-confuse-change-with-progress.html">Don&#8217;t Confuse Change with Progress</a><br />
<a href="http://architechure.blogspot.com/2009/04/autodesk-bob.html">Autodesk Bob</a><br />
<a href="http://architechure.blogspot.com/2009/04/humpty-dumpty-sat-on-a-wall.html">Humpty Dumpty Sat On a A Wall&#8230;</a><br />
<a href="http://architechure.blogspot.com/2009/04/dear-autodesk.html">Dear Autodesk</a><br />
<a href="http://redbolts.com/blog/post/2009/05/07/Revit-2011-the-most-significant-release-EVER.aspx">Revit 2011 &#8211; the most significant release EVER</a></p>
<p>Some of the threads from the AUGI <a href="http://forums.augi.com/forumdisplay.php?f=11">Revit &#8211; Out There</a> forum (requires free AUGI membership sign-up to view):</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?t=92112">Revit 2010 &#8211; New Ribbon UI</a><br />
<a href="http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?t=99307">1st impression from Revit 2010&#8230;</a><br />
<a href="http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?t=99789">What is your official opinion of 2010?</a><br />
<a href="http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?t=99790">Who do we complain to?</a><br />
<a href="http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?t=100244">2009 vs. 2010</a><br />
<a href="http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?t=100958">Revit evangelist fatigue</a></p>
<p>Finally, <a href="http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2009-03-21/">here&#8217;s a Dilbert cartoon</a> that was somebody else thought was a relevant comment on this situation.</p>
<p>In a future post, I&#8217;ll discuss how Autodesk&#8217;s Revit people have reacted to this criticism. Is Autodesk listening? Is it issuing corporate feelgood drivel? Is it circling the wagons and shooting the messengers as they ride by? Or is it doing all of the above?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/05/11/revolt-of-the-revit-ribbon-renegades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2010 &#8211; Will you miss the Menu Browser?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/20/autocad-2010-will-you-miss-the-menu-browser/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/20/autocad-2010-will-you-miss-the-menu-browser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve closed the poll that asked AutoCAD 2009 users about their MENUBAR setting. It&#8217;s very clear that pull-down menus are still very much in use in the Ribboned world of post-2008 AutoCAD. In AutoCAD 2009, an attempt was made to provide access to pull-down menus without sacrificing that strip of screen real estate. That [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve closed the <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/pollsarchive/">poll</a> that asked AutoCAD 2009 users about their MENUBAR setting. It&#8217;s very clear that pull-down menus are still very much in use in the Ribboned world of post-2008 AutoCAD. In AutoCAD 2009, an attempt was made to provide access to pull-down menus without sacrificing that strip of screen real estate. That attempt was called the Menu Browser, it was one of the thing you could find under the Big Red A, and it really <a href="http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/03/18/autocad-2009-the-prequel-part-19-menu-browser/">didn&#8217;t work very well</a>. In AutoCAD 2010, the Menu Browser has gone away. The A hasn&#8217;t gone away, just the ability to access pull-down menus through it.</p>
<p>There are some who have expressed a deep dislike of the Big Red A, although it never offended me greatly. I just wished the features hidden under it worked better than they did in 2009. Personally, I generally prefer what&#8217;s under the A in 2010 than what&#8217;s there in 2009, but you may not. I know that when the 2009 user interface was being attacked, its most prominent defenders were those keyboard-heavy users who turned both the Ribbon and the menu bar off, giving themselves more screen space. On the infrequent occasions when a pull-down menu was required, those people were content to provide an extra click.</p>
<p>When I found out about the Menu Browser&#8217;s death a few months ago, I expected there would be a severe adverse reaction from such people. Maybe there will be one when people hold get the shipping product and notice it&#8217;s gone. But after my poll showed only 7% of respondents used it instead of the menu bar, I&#8217;m now expecting that adverse reaction to be smaller than I originally thought.</p>
<p>If you want to use AutoCAD 2010, want to work without a menu bar but still have access to menu items occasionally, what can you do? You can add a button to the Quick Access Toolbar (QAT), or any other toolbar, that toggles the menu bar on and off. Use the CUI command to add such a button.* The following macro will do the job:</p>
<p><code>'menubar $M=$(-,1,$(getvar,menubar)) </code></p>
<p>There are a couple of downsides to this method. First, although this macro has been written in such a way that it should be transparent, it doesn&#8217;t currently work that way. When you push the button, AutoCAD will still cancel any command you&#8217;re in. Second, the screen resize forces a redraw, which could slow you down in very complex drawings. However, under most circumstances that redraw will still be quicker than waiting for a reaction from AutoCAD the first time you pick the Big Red A. By the way, that reaction time is better in 2010 than the very tardy 2009. As a result, even AutoCAD 2009 users might prefer to use the QAT-button method and forget the Menu Browser ever existed.</p>
<p>* If there is enough interest, I will do a video tutorial explaining how to add such a button to the QAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2009/02/20/autocad-2010-will-you-miss-the-menu-browser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2009 &#8211; Do you use the menu bar?</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/12/03/autocad-2009-do-you-use-the-menu-bar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/12/03/autocad-2009-do-you-use-the-menu-bar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You may have noticed that I&#8217;ve added a poll to find out if the AutoCAD 2009 users among you are using the menu bar (i.e. MENUBAR = 1). I&#8217;m also interested in hearing your comments about your usage and the reasons behind it.</p> <p>If your menu bar turned on, why? Do you use it all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have noticed that I&#8217;ve added a poll to find out if the AutoCAD 2009 users among you are using the menu bar (i.e. MENUBAR = 1). I&#8217;m also interested in hearing your comments about your usage and the reasons behind it.</p>
<p>If your menu bar turned on, why? Do you use it all the time or do you just need it for those less-frequently-used commands that you don&#8217;t have handy at your fingertips, on toolbars, palettes or the Ribbon? Do you need it because your own custom routines are on menus, or third-party commands? Does the vertical AutoCAD variant you&#8217;re using need it?</p>
<p>If your menu bar is turned off, why? Do you never have any need for the stuff in there? Do you use the Menu Browser instead, sacrificing an occasional extra click for the sake of a permanent strip of screen space?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/12/03/autocad-2009-do-you-use-the-menu-bar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoCAD 2009 &#8211; An outsider&#8217;s look at the Ribbon</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/10/30/autocad-2009-an-outsiders-look-at-the-ribbon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/10/30/autocad-2009-an-outsiders-look-at-the-ribbon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoCAD 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ribbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Kirill Grouchnikov is a developer who has a blog called Pushing Pixels. This wouldn&#8217;t normally be of particular interest to AutoCAD users, but he recently wrote a piece describing the AutoCAD 2009 Ribbon. It is always interesting to things described from a different perspective, in this case the Ribbon from a non-user&#8217;s point of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirill Grouchnikov is a developer who has a blog called <a href="http://www.pushing-pixels.org/">Pushing Pixels</a>. This wouldn&#8217;t normally be of particular interest to AutoCAD users, but he recently wrote <a href="http://www.pushing-pixels.org/?p=622">a piece describing the AutoCAD 2009 Ribbon</a>. It is always interesting to things described from a different perspective, in this case the Ribbon from a non-user&#8217;s point of view. He pays particular attention to the ways in which the AutoCAD Ribbon differs from Microsoft&#8217;s standards. As a non-user, he has skipped lightly over several aspects of AutoCAD Ribbon use, including some drawbacks of the current implementation, but it is still a worthwhile read, as are some of the comments that follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blog.cadnauseam.com/2008/10/30/autocad-2009-an-outsiders-look-at-the-ribbon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

