If you have Communications Center disabled (this is quite common, it seems) or you’re not currently using your 2009-based vertical product, you may be unaware that Autodesk has released versions of Update 1 (formerly known as SP1) for the architectural and civil variants of AutoCAD 2009. Expect the other verticals to follow soon. A visit to the Autodesk site and search for “Update 1″ currently returns 18 results. As usual, read the Readme first and exercise caution (or even paranoia) before installing.
A strange mix of AutoCAD, music, image manipulation and video
blog nauseam
13 August 2008 at 1:38 pm
Look out for Update 1 for AutoCAD 2009-based verticals
4
Polls
Loading ...
Loading ...
Loading ...
Loading ...
Loading ...
Loading ...
Loading ...Blog Statistics
- Total Stats
- 367 Posts
- 400 Tags
- 1,610 Comments
- 531 Comment Posters
- 65 Post Categories
- 50 Most Commented Posts
- AutoCAD 2009 – Putting things back to “normal” - 89 comments
- AutoCAD 2009 – Why do you hate the Ribbon? - 67 comments
- AutoCAD 2010 – Putting things back to “normal” - 59 comments
- Why AutoCAD for Mac is a bad idea - 56 comments
- How will you react to Autodesk’s new upgrade pricing? - 34 comments
- AutoCAD 2011 – Putting things back to “normal” - 25 comments
- Older AutoCAD loses (part of) the plot - 22 comments
- Vernor v Autodesk – why I think Autodesk is right - 21 comments
- Ask Autodesk a question - 20 comments
- Advertising, ethics and editorial freedom - 19 comments
- Ribbon acceptance in AutoCAD and Revit - 19 comments
- AutoCAD 2009 – How do you use the Ribbon? - 18 comments
- AutoCAD 2009 – Do you use the menu bar? - 17 comments
- Pin the name on the product and win a prize! - 17 comments
- Not answering the question - 17 comments
- Autodesk’s 12-month release cycle – Is it harmful? - 16 comments
- What is loaded at AutoCAD startup, and when? - 16 comments
- Blogging = arrogance? - 16 comments
- Autodesk answers – 1 of 4 - 16 comments
- AutoCAD for Linux – another bad idea - 16 comments
- Downloading AutoCAD 2011 - 16 comments
- Who is this person? - 15 comments
- Can you work without a command line? - 15 comments
- Bug watch – identify this insect - 13 comments
- Not another SpacePilot PRO review - 12 comments
- AutoCAD 2011′s new Help system – what do you think? - 12 comments
- Autodesk Subscription – it could be worse - 12 comments
- AutoCAD 2011 online Help changes – a curate’s egg - 12 comments
- AutoCAD 2009 – Action Recorder needs action - 11 comments
- AutoCAD on Linux – Video - 11 comments
- Autodesk’s Revit rebellion reaction - 11 comments
- The biggest DWG file I’ve ever seen - 11 comments
- Why don’t you use the current release? - 11 comments
- AutoCAD 2009 & 2010 users – out of memory errors? - 11 comments
- What’s the best thing about AutoCAD 2009? - 10 comments
- I haven’t seen AutoCAD 2010… - 10 comments
- Autodesk to more than triple upgrade prices - 10 comments
- Autodesk messes up Raster Design 2010 licensing - 10 comments
- AUGI Special Election – Candidates - 10 comments
- Comment censorship - 10 comments
- Quick and dirty clicks and drags in AutoCAD - 10 comments
- Autodesk’s CIP data – massively biased? - 10 comments
- Autodesk discussion group update – what do you think? - 10 comments
- Autodesk University is moving! - 9 comments
- AutoCAD 2009 – The Prequel Part 8 – Vista Startup Times - 9 comments
- Autodesk discussion group maintenance failure - 9 comments
- The 12-month cycle and shipping software with known bugs - 9 comments
- What do I think of the Ribbon? - 9 comments
- AutoCAD 2011 Help system is not popular - 9 comments
- Autodesk to kill NNTP discussion groups - 9 comments
- Total Stats
Archives
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (9)
- July 2010 (10)
- June 2010 (7)
- May 2010 (23)
- April 2010 (16)
- March 2010 (20)
- February 2010 (11)
- January 2010 (5)
- October 2009 (3)
- September 2009 (2)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (2)
- June 2009 (12)
- May 2009 (11)
- April 2009 (12)
- March 2009 (6)
- February 2009 (22)
- January 2009 (6)
- December 2008 (8)
- November 2008 (13)
- October 2008 (22)
- September 2008 (18)
- August 2008 (3)
- July 2008 (13)
- June 2008 (12)
- May 2008 (11)
- April 2008 (23)
- March 2008 (38)
- February 2008 (22)
Calendar
-
Spam Blocked
Recent Comments
- Bryan Tanner on iPad, iPhone app – good and bad news
- Patrick Hughes on AutoCAD 2011 for Mac announced
- R.K. McSwain on AutoCAD for Mac – what’s missing?
- Steve Johnson on Autodesk Subscription – it could be worse
- Dave on Autodesk Subscription – it could be worse
- Steve Johnson on AutoCAD for Mac – what’s missing?
- Steve Johnson on AutoCAD 2009 – Putting things back to “normal”
- Steve Johnson on When is AutoCAD not AutoCAD?
- Daniel Maldonado on Why AutoCAD for Mac is a bad idea
- Daniel Maldonado on Why AutoCAD for Mac is a bad idea
- Robin Capper on When is AutoCAD not AutoCAD?
- Mike Burke on When is AutoCAD not AutoCAD?
- R. Paul Waddington on AutoCAD for Mac – what’s missing?
- Lourdes Huber on AutoCAD 2009 – Putting things back to “normal”
- Jimbo on AutoCAD for Mac – what’s missing?
-
Recent Posts
- iPad, iPhone app – good and bad news
- AutoCAD for Mac – what’s missing?
- When is AutoCAD not AutoCAD?
- AutoCAD 2011 for Mac announced
- AutoCAD 2011 Update 1 recalled
- Why we keep upgrading
- More Autodesk deception over LT productivity study
- AutoCAD 2011 Update 1
- Autodesk user community survey
- I got into a fight. Caught on video.
- Not answering the question
- Studying Autodesk’s productivity study
- Magic vanishing images
- Autodesk’s Callan Carpenter responds to Subscription follow-up
- This spam amuses me
Meta
CAD Blogs
CAD Links
- AUGI Forums
- AutoCAD Discussion Groups
- AutoCAD Exchange
- AutoCAD History
- Autodesk
- Autodesk Beta
- Autodesk Labs
- Autodesk University
- blog nauseam shop
- Bug Watch
- CAD Digest
- cad nauseam
- CAD Tutor Forums
- Cadalyst Forums
- Cadalyst Magazine
- CADforum.cz
- CADLock, Inc.
- Ed Goldberg
- ManuSoft
- OpenDCL
- The Swamp
- upFront.eZine
Other Links
- 27b/6
- Apostrophe Abuse
- Australian ISP Filtering
- Chilling Effects
- Dell customer stories
- Engrish
- Epic Win FTW
- Excalibur Fencing Club
- FAIL Blog
- Failbooking
- FMyLife
- Hacked IRL
- HP customer stories
- HP Lies
- Know Your Meme
- Lamebook
- Libel law reform petition
- Literally, A Web Log
- Not Always Right
- Oddly Specific
- Passive-aggressive notes
- People of Walmart
- Photoshop Disasters
- Picture Is Unrelated
- Saratoga Hosting
- Sexy People (ironic)
- Steve on Twitter
- Steve’s Twitter RSS Feed
- Steve’s YouTube Videos
- The “Blog” of “Unnecessary” Quotation Marks
- The Customer Service Helper
- The Streisand Effect Blog
- This is Photobomb
- Voyager
- Wedinator
- YouTomb
Categories
Tags
12-Month Release Cycle Announcement AU2006 AUGI AutoCAD AutoCAD 2009 AutoCAD 2010 AutoCAD 2011 AutoCAD for Mac Autodesk Autodesk University Blogging Bug Cadalyst Callan Carpenter Comments CUI Customer Service Fail Feedback Fun Gaahl Image manipulation Interview Legal Licensing Metal Music Navel Gazing Newsgroups Other Blogs Performance Pictures Polls Rant Ribbon Shaan Hurley Subscription Survey Tip Update User Interface User Reaction Video Web Stuff

4:00 pm on August 13th, 2008 1
You’re not paranoid if they are out to get you
Watch out for the black helicopters
8:53 pm on August 13th, 2008 2
Ah, but just because they’re out to get you doesn’t mean you’re not paranoid.
2:51 pm on August 16th, 2008 3
does Autocad 2009 allow mass calculations for centre of gravity of components ??
11:16 am on August 18th, 2008 4
AutoCAD has a Massprop command that lists a Centroid property for 3D solids. This is only useful for objects of uniform mass. This is not new to 2009; it has remained unchanged since it was introduced by Release 13.